Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Animal testing: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SlimVirgin (talk | contribs)
created page
 
SlimVirgin (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:


===Other steps in [[Wikipedia:Resolving disputes|dispute resolution]] that have been attempted===
===Other steps in [[Wikipedia:Resolving disputes|dispute resolution]] that have been attempted===
*Frequent discussion and arguments on [[Talk:Animal testing]] for many months, with no resolution of any of the issues.
*Frequent discussion and arguments on [[Talk:Animal testing]] for many months, with no resolution of any of the issues, along with several article RfCs.


===Issues to be mediated===
===Issues to be mediated===

Revision as of 03:48, 30 January 2008

Animal testing

Involved parties

  1. Crum375 (talk · contribs)
  2. Rockpocket (talk · contribs)
  3. SlimVirgin (talk · contribs)
  4. Tim Vickers (talk · contribs)

Articles involved

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted

  • Frequent discussion and arguments on Talk:Animal testing for many months, with no resolution of any of the issues, along with several article RfCs.

Issues to be mediated

The party filing this request uses this section to list the issues for mediation. Other parties can list additional issues in the section below.

The main issues are that one party makes frequent use of primary sources, in a way that amounts to original research. There is an overreliance on reverting as an editing tool, rather than collaboration. There is from one editor, as I see it, a desire to push a certain POV, rather than to write an informative article, and there is a disagreement as to the purpose of the article, and what areas it should cover. One editor appears also, as I see it, to have invited other editors to the page to cause a problem, rather than to improve the article. So the point of the mediation would be to try to facilitate a more respectful and collaborative editing environment.

Additional issues to be mediated

Other parties can use this section to list any others issues they wish to include in the mediation. Please do not modify or remove any other party's listing. Please sign all additions to this section if there are more than two parties involved in this case.
  • Additional issue 1
  • Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "Agree" or "Disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed, but can be made at the talk page.
  1. Agree. SlimVirgin (talk)(contribs) 03:48, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-Committee members should not edit this section.