Talk:Dodge Durango

'Rumors' section removed from main article

The following appeared as a top-level section — see permalink for version prior to removal. My feeling is that a 'rumors' section really doesn't belong in Wikipedia, at least not without a reference to support it. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:26, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Rumors

In 2008, DaimlerChrysler is expected to introduce a hybrid version of the Durango which uses the shared GM/DaimlerChrysler Advanced Hybrid System 2. It is expected to use the 5.7 L Hemi V8.

The 2005 Update

I think there needs to me more clarification on the 2005 Update. When I first came to this page, I was confused out of my mind why there was a third version showing up on the side bar. So, I tried to put a side by side comparison on the 2004 subsection. I think the way it is now is way too confusing because there's this red herring/outlier of an image at the top, with no explanatory text for the images at all. My attempt to revise was reverted, perhaps someone can suggest a better way to show this?-146.115.115.184 (talk) 09:50, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

redundant pictures

Why are Image:2004-06 Dodge Durango.jpg and Image:07-Dodge-Durango.jpg used both in the body and side-bars? ataricom (talk) 05:22, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Why put two cars on the same image per Wikipedia standards? -- Bull-Doser (talk) 18:05, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi BullDoser, it took a while, and a few reversions. But you're finally here. I'll catch you up to speed: [1], [2], [3]. -72.93.80.5 (talk) 01:14, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Talk to IFCAR about the Dodge Durango image. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 20:08, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

I dont' understand. You've addressed none of the issues I've raised in the three links I've provided, and you've given me a non sequitur about IFCAR. IFCAR has nothing to do with anything. I am puzzled. Please elaborate beyond one sentence. --72.93.80.5 (talk) 21:15, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

You are welcome to read edit summaries in the future before calling edits "unexplained." I should think they were very well explained, while yours have not been. Please stop inserting photos of multiple vehicles into one infobox, and please stop putting a lower-quality image in the head infobox. IFCAR (talk) 23:26, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Multiple pages in one infobox are the norm. Consult: Russian_American, Usa, China, Jewish_American, African_american, Russia. Low quality info box images are the norm. consult: Aston_Martin_DB9, Aston_Martin_V8_Vantage_(2005), Ford Taurus. Moreover, you continue to revert without addressing a single concern I've listed above. Please do so and let's work out a comprimise! I'm more than happy to comprimise. I'm more than willing to make this a cooperative effort instead of a reversion war. I have attempted to modify this page over a course of four months and dozens of reversions. No one has addressed a single issue I've raised in the past 4 months. The page remains flawed with the issues I've raised in Nov 2007. Again: I am very willing to comprimise, but we cannot comprimise and collaborate if you do not address my concerns as I have done to yours. Please, let's neogtiate and comprimise instead of revert. Thanx. You are welcome to come to the talk page to discuss instead of using edit summaries which I cannot reply to and which are not easily archived.-72.93.80.5 (talk) 23:47, 30 January 2008 (UTC)