User talk:Fox

Thank you

		Milhist Coordinator elections
		Thank you very much for your support in the recent Military history Wikiproject elections. I went into it expecting to just keep my seat and was astonished to end up with the lead role. I anticipate a rather busy six months :) --ROGER DAVIES talk 13:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC) Haut-Koeningsbourg castle, Alsace.

Welcome

Welcome Fox

Thank you for joining the Law Enforcement Wikiproject on the English Wikipedia! As you would have guessed we are a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to law enforcement

Since you now are a member you get to have our userbox or banner on your userpage! To add these use:

1. {{User WikiprojectPolice}} -- our userbox, or
2. {{Lawenforcementmember}} -- our member banner.

Here are some more tips to get you started:

• Creating articles: See here for articles you can create, but don't forget to add [[Category:Law enforcement]] to the base of the article and our project banner to the talk page of the article using {{WPLE}}
• Participate on our talk page: It is highly recommended that you watchlist it. There are also a number of small projects on the talk page as well that may be of interest to you!
• Check the bulletin board: For news and information, please read the bulletin board regularly or add it to you user-page using: {{Lawenforcementbulletinboard}}
• Improve an article: Click here to find all the really short articles, pick one from that list and improve it. When you are done go to the talk page of that article and removed {{WPLE| class=Stub}} the bit in bold and another editor will be along to see how well you have done and reassess the article to a much higher class.

All members are reminded:

• That this project aims for: No vandalism, no conflict and if particular articles in this project are suffering from vandalism, edit wars or talk-page abuse, please add it to the Article Watch List

In a nutshell:

• Join, Create & Assess
• Members in trouble can go to:

1. SGGH ^speak! (Project Coordinator)
2. Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) (Assistant Coordinator)
3. Or any project coordinator listed on the main project page or members page.

Again, Thank you and Welcome

SGGH ^speak! 20:05, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism

The recent edit you made to User Talk:Karaku constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks -Karaku (talk) 21:05, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

I think you'll find it was not vandalism but a warning for vandalism. Thank you. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{aka john lennon} 21:13, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Except i didn't vandalize. Therefore that is a fake warning, not legit, and it's vandalism. -Karaku (talk) 21:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Good faith edits are not vandalism Karaku, please read WP:AGF. If you contest it, don't start an argument and blame the warner for vandalism, otherwise it could be seen as disruptive. — Save_Us † 21:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

WBOSITG, while I defer to your much more copious knowledge of Wikipedia, I have to agree with Save Us that the reporting of Karaku was a little out of process. While it is a policy I vehemently disagree with, I'm sure you are aware that people are technically allowed to blank warnings. Aside from the bad faith vandal reports on your userpage, I don't think Karaku ever vandalized anything per se. He/she just has a major civility issue (even after both a friendly and a stern warning). I do think a block is warranted, though, and hey, if what you did makes it happen, you can't argue with results I guess.. --Jaysweet (talk) 21:25, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Zaxbys

hi, my recent addition is not spam. several locations, including the one in my city charges for extra condiments. it is notable since the majority of fast food places do not charge. please revert the article and my talk page back. thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.199.130.222 (talk) 21:39, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

is this case it does, since nearly all fast food does not charge, and zaxby's is being one of the only exceptions to charge. I will revert it or take my case up with an admin since you want to be rude about it and leave nasty comments. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.199.130.222 (talk) 21:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Random Wiki Smile

WarthogDemon has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

-WarthogDemon 22:54, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. :) Not to brag at all but I seem to have a knack for sending Smiles whenever a user needs one. O_o I've forgotten that during my absence here. Cheers. :) -WarthogDemon 23:01, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Grrrr..... Part 3

Completely nicked for me. Not even a smidge of recognition. I'm very displeased.^{The anti-vandal userpage thing} :) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:14, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Your userpage. (When your press the edit button, what happens to vandals.... - Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:18, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

I created "Version 2.0" I can put in on your userpage (if you like) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright. The RFA? No, not tomorrow. I said March 15th, remember? I just happen to be moving on March 15th, so I might delay the date. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Now, when some vandal tries to edit your page, they will probably faint. Check it out. If you don't like it keep the old one. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

You don't like it? I'm going to fix your username misspelling (whoops!) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:38, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok done. I made a BIG MISTAKE though. LOL. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:44, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Actually - VI - Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:48, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh. LOL! - Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:50, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

You are quicker than I am!

I got a rollback on Anton LeVey, but you beat me to the warning, twice!! Give a new hunter a chance  ;) Legotech·(t)·(c) 23:56, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism

I noticed your having a bit of trouble with weirdo vandalism on your Userpage, hope it clears up soon. But apart from that how is your w/e going? [[::User:Police,Mad,Jack|Police,Mad,Jack]] ([[::User talk:Police,Mad,Jack|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Police,Mad,Jack|contribs]])☺ 18:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Your always going to find some person who makes out everything you do is crap. [[::User:Police,Mad,Jack|Police,Mad,Jack]] ([[::User talk:Police,Mad,Jack|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Police,Mad,Jack|contribs]])☺ 18:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Give him your best Glasgow Kiss lol. [[::User:Police,Mad,Jack|Police,Mad,Jack]] ([[::User talk:Police,Mad,Jack|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Police,Mad,Jack|contribs]])☺ 18:40, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Haha

It's ironic that you abbreviate Aberdeen F.C. as AFC, since you also have the WP:WPAFC userbox on your userpage. Nousernamesleft^{copper, not wood} 20:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I liked your old userpage better... sort of. Oh noes! Where did all the information go? It couldn't be at User talk:WBOSITG/Userpage or anything... ;) Nousernamesleft^{copper, not wood} 21:05, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

It would be really hilarious if you put something like, "Turn to page 46 for the answer." Nousernamesleft^{copper, not wood} 21:13, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

For cleaning up what 122.162.197.242 (talk · contribs) added to those pages I've worked on. I'm not sure what his problem was, but that's not the way to go about it. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 21:01, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I think what happened is the IP changed to a new user who got that old message. Gonna explain it to them. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 21:11, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

Thank you very much for giving your support to my admin application, which recently closed successfully (36/3/1). I hope I can continue to justify the confidence that you have placed in me. If there is any way that I can help out more, please drop me a line. Thanks again. - 52 Pickup (deal) 22:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

About the modification on Beijing Olympics.

I don't think a tabloid news is what wikipedia wants to quote.

It reported an eviction of 2 million people in the so-called newspaper, while wikipedia reported a 300,000 people move in total for Olympics. It's a contradiction already.

Please find a way to valid the source of citation or else please delete this part. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.108.248.216 (talk) 10:01, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

p90

The p90 is used by the U.S.A's air force special operations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lotta liquor (talk • contribs) 10:23, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

p90

I serverd in the U.S.A.F's special forces unit 369 and we used the p90. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lotta liquor (talk • contribs) 10:30, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

WP:LOM Newsletter

The Life on Mars Wikiproject Newsletter Issue 3 - March 2008

"Take that seatbelt off. You're a police officer, not a bloody vicar." - Gene Hunt Project news Still no change in the volume of good articles in the project; Come on, we can do it! Many revert wars have occurred. Please keep an eye on DC Chris Skelton for pathetic arbitrary word vandalism and John Simm for potential edit wars. A new section has been posted to the project page for potential sources for articles, and another for image tips. To do Major sourcing, image adding and other housekeeping tasks. Everything Ashes to Ashes should be worked on.

New members Dave Dubya, JordanAshley, Freddie R. Aldous, A bright cold day in April, Exxolon and Shealer joined in February. Welcome, all! Farewell to Tony Sidaway who left the project. Good luck in the future.

Newsletter delievered by WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN ^{aka john lennon} on 11:29, 2 March 2008 (UTC) using AWB

Re:Ha

Ummm...good for you, I guess... Two One Six Five Five ^τ _ʃ 14:00, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

BOLD ALLCAPS SIG

Hi WBO. Thanks for you contributions.

Your sig is really loud. Could I suggest you turn it down a little, perhaps unbold, smaller font, or a lighter color? It's not a big deal, not something I usually care about, and if you don't want to change it, not something I'd complain about. But usually by the time I notice something like this, someone else is being really aggravated by it, so maybe you might wanna consider. / edg ☺ ☭ 15:45, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Right you are - I was thinking that myself... how's it now? ^{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN aka john lennon} 15:47, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

On my browser (Firefox on Puppy Linux, Xfce desktop I think) it looks about the same, but higher. If you're still trying things out, then I don't need to butt in any further. Thanks for getting back to me on this. / edg ☺ ☭ 15:53, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry; typo in the code. Should be ok now, this is what I've used since December. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{aka john lennon} 15:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Okay, this time it's lower. I'm guessing that's cos it's "buried in the garden". Also, I'm wrong about Xfce; I'm actually using IceWM. / edg ☺ ☭ 15:59, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

United States invasion of Panama

Your edits, I am afraid, are not conducive to productive or constructive edits to this article and in fact ignore the glaring problems as I have outlined including whole paragraphs containing tendentious unsourced material and other edits which are quite problematic despite superficial sourcing. Please direct concerns to the relevant talk page rather than revert blindly. Thank you. NSIprogram (talk) 16:09, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

The most glaring problem is that a few paragraphs are not sourced at all and make highly controversial claims. The second problem is that those which are sourced do not have provenance that establishes their relevance to the subject matter other than establishing tertiary political points to the US system. Above all, there is absolutely no reason to revert a dozen times unsourced, tendentious material as I have deleted. There is no valid inclusionist, et al, reason to revert it. NSIprogram (talk) 16:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

I can not underestimate my appreciation for your speedy concern regarding my deletions and thank you for your considered response. Unfortunately I do see a battle brewing over the sourced but irrelevant deletions but do not foresee a serious effort mounted over the unsourced responses. I thank you for your timely edits and hope that you take general interest in this article in the future. NSIprogram (talk) 16:36, 2 March 2008 (UTC)