Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Hollywood Republicans (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
A Nobody (talk | contribs)
k
Line 10: Line 10:
*'''Delete''' speculation --[[User:Pustefix|Pustefix]] ([[User talk:Pustefix|talk]]) 18:22, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' speculation --[[User:Pustefix|Pustefix]] ([[User talk:Pustefix|talk]]) 18:22, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per [[Wikipedia:Lists]] (discriminate, notable, and verifiable). Sincerely, --<font face="Times New Roman">[[User:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|<span style="color:#009">Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|Tally-ho!]]''</sup> 18:26, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per [[Wikipedia:Lists]] (discriminate, notable, and verifiable). Sincerely, --<font face="Times New Roman">[[User:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|<span style="color:#009">Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|Tally-ho!]]''</sup> 18:26, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as not notable.--[[User:Berig|Berig]] ([[User talk:Berig|talk]]) 18:53, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:53, 20 April 2008

List of Hollywood Republicans

List of Hollywood Republicans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This should almost be a speedy, as it basically a recreation of the article deleted here, but it sort of survived a convoluted AFD before, so here we go again. This article is completely unsourced, and doesn't define either the Hollywood or the Republican aspects. Is it only actual members of the Republican party? Anyone who's expressed right-of-center views? Anyone who has ever voiced support for a single Republican candidate? Anyone who has voiced opposition to a Democrat or a left-wing cause? If it were to clearly define that it is only actual members of the Republican Party, we might have something (assuming we could also define who is "Hollywood" and who isn't), but in that case we'd need a reliable citation for each and every entry being a confirmed member of that party. Right now there are zero such citations. Even if it could meet that criterion, the article is still of questionable usefulness, and another one of those potentially endless lists. There's a reason why there's no List of Hollywood Democrats page. Anyway, the new name aside, this article has all the problems of the earlier deleted article, without any of the sources. I fail to see why it's here. R. fiend (talk) 06:20, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]