User talk:Boothy443/Archive 4: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:40, 10 August 2005

This talk page may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion because: archival purposes. For valid criteria, see CSD.

If this talk page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page and you disagree with the given reason for deletion, you can click the button below and leave a message explaining why you believe it should not be deleted. You can check back later to see if you have received a response to your message.

Note that this talk page may be deleted at any time if it unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria, or if an explanation added below this notice is found to be insufficient.

Nominator: Please consider placing the template:

{{subst:db-reason-notice|User talk:Boothy443/Archive 4|header=1|archival purposes}} ~~~~

on the talk page of the author.

Administrators: check links, talk, history (last), and logs before deletion. Consider checking Google.
This page was last edited by Ikuzaf (contribs | logs) at 21:40, 10 August 2005 (UTC) (18 years ago)[reply]

CFD

Please stop changing the consensus made by WP:CFD. This is not a "secret decision". Any further removal, may be treated as vandalism. Please read: Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 August 3#Category:Delaware River crossings K1Bond007 20:15, August 10, 2005 (UTC)

As creator of the category ii was never notified of the consideration of deletion or the decision to delete that category from any person, their for i have no other reason to believe that the decision was delibertly made to conduct a secret vote to it's deletion without the input or reasoning from the person that created it. So i will not encnoledge the validity of the derision and i will consider it vandalism my self and will continue to revert. Admin pridvilidges do not prevent you from vandalising pages. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 20:30, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- If you continue to revert you will be blocked for 3RR and vandalism yourself. Please stop. K1Bond007 was not vandalising the page. There was a consensus to merge the articles. --Kbdank71 20:56, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - Once again, they just hide behind their "consensus", when it's really not it's a vot in which a undefined percentage of useres who decide to visit that page to hid behind their poor decisions and policies. So i will contiune to revert as i dont not acepte this seceret vote, and will contiune do do so as i see fit. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 21:02, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    - You have been blocked for 24 hours for 3RR and vandalism. --Kbdank71 21:05, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User:BaronLarf

You realised you actually voted for BaronLarf's rfa? Was that a typo? Slac speak up! 21:40, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 ***Once again, they just hide behind their "consensus", when it's really not it's a vot in which a undefined percentage of useres who decide to visit that page to hid behind their poor decisions and policies. So i will contiune to revert as i dont not acepte this seceret vote, and will contiune do do so as i see fit. --[[User:Boothy443|Boothy443]] | [[User talk:Boothy443|comhrÚ]] 21:02, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 ****You have been blocked for 24 hours for 3RR and vandalism.  --[[User:Kbdank71|Kbdank71]] 21:05, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
+==[[User:BaronLarf]]==
+You realised you actually voted ''for'' [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BaronLarf|BaronLarf's rfa]]?  Was that a typo?  [[User:Lacrimosus|Slac]] [[User talk:Lacrimosus|<small>speak up!</small>]] 21:40, 10 August 2005 (UTC)