Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tōru Furuya: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
speedy keep |
→Tōru Furuya: comment |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*'''Speedy Keep'''. The star of [[Mobile Suit Gundam|one of the most iconic anime series of all time]] is obviously notable, and lack of sources is not a valid reason for deletion. — [[User:Redxiv|Red XIV]] <sup>([[User talk:Redxiv|talk]])</sup> 05:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Speedy Keep'''. The star of [[Mobile Suit Gundam|one of the most iconic anime series of all time]] is obviously notable, and lack of sources is not a valid reason for deletion. — [[User:Redxiv|Red XIV]] <sup>([[User talk:Redxiv|talk]])</sup> 05:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. Lack of sources is a perfectly valid reason for deletion when dealing with [[WP:BLP]] articles. Secondly, this article is one gigantic trainwreck piled into another gigantic trainwreck. [[User:JBsupreme|JBsupreme]] ([[User talk:JBsupreme|talk]]) 06:12, 7 October 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. Lack of sources is a perfectly valid reason for deletion when dealing with [[WP:BLP]] articles. Secondly, this article is one gigantic trainwreck piled into another gigantic trainwreck. [[User:JBsupreme|JBsupreme]] ([[User talk:JBsupreme|talk]]) 06:12, 7 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
**Gigantic trainwrecks are generally notable. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="green">日本穣</font>]]<sup>[[Help:Japanese|?]] · <small>[[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</sup></small> 09:02, 7 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
*'''<s>Speedy</s> Strong Keep''' this nom is absolutely ridiculous. As Redxiv said, this is one of the most popular Japanese voice actors of all time. AfD is not cleanup. [[User:JuJube|JuJube]] ([[User talk:JuJube|talk]]) 06:58, 7 October 2008 (UTC) |
*'''<s>Speedy</s> Strong Keep''' this nom is absolutely ridiculous. As Redxiv said, this is one of the most popular Japanese voice actors of all time. AfD is not cleanup. [[User:JuJube|JuJube]] ([[User talk:JuJube|talk]]) 06:58, 7 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
** Invalid speedy keep, would you like to cite some sources or are you going to continue to stammer as well? [[User:JBsupreme|JBsupreme]] ([[User talk:JBsupreme|talk]]) 07:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC) |
** Invalid speedy keep, would you like to cite some sources or are you going to continue to stammer as well? [[User:JBsupreme|JBsupreme]] ([[User talk:JBsupreme|talk]]) 07:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:02, 7 October 2008
- Tōru Furuya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The article is not supported by reliable third party sources, amongst many other serious content issues. There should be a standard, even within an on-line encyclopedia, to be able to support content being written about living people. Danielsagayama (talk) 17:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep. The star of one of the most iconic anime series of all time is obviously notable, and lack of sources is not a valid reason for deletion. — Red XIV (talk) 05:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Lack of sources is a perfectly valid reason for deletion when dealing with WP:BLP articles. Secondly, this article is one gigantic trainwreck piled into another gigantic trainwreck. JBsupreme (talk) 06:12, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Gigantic trainwrecks are generally notable. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 09:02, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
SpeedyStrong Keep this nom is absolutely ridiculous. As Redxiv said, this is one of the most popular Japanese voice actors of all time. AfD is not cleanup. JuJube (talk) 06:58, 7 October 2008 (UTC)- Invalid speedy keep, would you like to cite some sources or are you going to continue to stammer as well? JBsupreme (talk) 07:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- I would advise you to redact that comment since it's obviously snarky on its face. In either case, a lack of knowledge on the subject on your part does not constitute non-notability. Links are not hard to find with Google, but the fact that the subject in question has voiced multiple extremely notable anime characters speaks for itself. The fact that the article is in garbage condition doesn't mean anything. Unless you'd nominate Mel Blanc for deletion if his article was full of unreferenced statements, too? JuJube (talk) 07:14, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Invalid speedy keep, would you like to cite some sources or are you going to continue to stammer as well? JBsupreme (talk) 07:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Fg2 (talk) 08:14, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep. The article has references, but they are not inline references. I've modified the cleanup tag on the article t reflect this. This is an absurd nomination given the obvious amount of work this actor has done. This nomination is the equivalent of nominating Tom Cruise if there were no inline refs in that article. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 09:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC)