Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HEI Hospitality: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:15, 6 December 2008

HEI Hospitality

The original nomination for speedy deletion was turned down as "not quite" - see history for precise wording. Nonetheless this is a blatant advert. The references are to its own website (one link is valid, I agree) and to some form of "list my hotel" club that is not reliable as a source. Sufficient time has elapsed form the originator's talk page response stating that much press is available, but it is not forthcoming as a reference. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:27, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - it is a little bit spammy. However, we should have an article on this company. They operate 30 hotels under five-star brand names. - Richard Cavell (talk) 09:30, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's not notable enough, and the issue boxes at the top make up 60% of the whole article. TopGearFreak ^Talk 13:14, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 13:32, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 14:24, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I didn't detect any notability beneath the spam. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:55, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 02:33, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - “…the nation's fastest growing private owner/operators of hotel real estate” as outlined in the first Google News cite from a independent - verifiable - creditable 3rd party source, as shown here [1]. In addition to several dozen other references as noted by the above link. Believe it satisfies our requirements for inclusion under Notability for companies. Thanks. ShoesssS ^Talk 02:51, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If your link wasn't to a reprint of the company's press release (see full text here), I'd almost share in your enthusiasm. 160.39.213.152 (talk) 02:04, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I believe there were 52 other articles shown in that link - None of them were to your liking?ShoesssS ^Talk 02:15, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A major company with major hotels, and adequate sourcing to show notability.DGG (talk) 05:17, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Which of the two non-independent sources currently in the article do you consider adequate? 160.39.213.152 (talk) 02:04, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 *'''Keep''' - “…the nation's fastest growing private owner/operators of hotel real estate” as outlined in the first [[Google News]] cite from a independent - verifiable - creditable 3rd party source, as shown here [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22HEI+Hotels+%26+Resorts%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8].  In addition to several dozen other references as noted by the above link.  Believe it satisfies our requirements for inclusion under [[Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)|Notability for companies]].  Thanks. <font face="Times New Roman">[[User:Shoessss|'''S'''''hoesss'''''S''']] <sup>[[User talk:Shoessss|''Talk'']]</sup></font> 02:51, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 **If your link wasn't to a reprint of the company's press release (see full text [http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS154951+12-Aug-2008+PRN20080812 here]), I'd almost share in your enthusiasm. [[Special:Contributions/160.39.213.152|160.39.213.152]] ([[User talk:160.39.213.152|talk]]) 02:04, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
+:::I believe there were 52 other articles shown in that link - None of them were to your liking?<font face="Times New Roman">[[User:Shoessss|'''S'''''hoesss'''''S''']] <sup>[[User talk:Shoessss|''Talk'']]</sup></font> 02:15, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' A major company with major hotels, and adequate sourcing to show notability.'''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 05:17, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 **Which of the two non-independent sources currently in the article do you consider adequate? [[Special:Contributions/160.39.213.152|160.39.213.152]] ([[User talk:160.39.213.152|talk]]) 02:04, 6 December 2008 (UTC)