User talk:Vanished user 210iu3nr

Hello, Vanished user 210iu3nr! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Addbot (talk) 20:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Natalie Wood images

Hi, it's hard to know what is causing the problem without actually seeing it. To answer your question about how to insert the licence - again, without seeing it, I'm not sure but you could try finding another image that is already uploaded and which uses the same licence. If you go into the edit window for that image and copy the licencing info and then copy it into either the edit window or the upload window, it should work. I'm a little confused though. You said you were looking for licencing information for some unfree images you'd found, including some from From Here to Eternity. Is that correct? Because if they're not free you won't be able to upload them to Commons and the upload selections there don't offer anything for an unfree image, but you may still be able to use them here, per the information I gave you on the Natalie Wood talk page. If you have found the images on a website, if you can give me the url/link I'll have a look. Without that, I'm not sure exactly what you have there. Rossrs (talk) 11:47, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Angelina Jolie

I have returned the article to the last version that I edited for a number of reasons. First of all, this is a featured article and you are required to add sourcing for changes you make to content. It is never proper to change content that is already sourced so that it appears the source given supports your change.

• Your changes are, in part, factually incorrect according to the sources that I added to support the content.
  • It is never appropriate to insert factual changes in front of a citation that supports the original version. You changed the text "After her parents' separation in 1976, Jolie and her brother were raised by their mother" which is supported by this source which states "Her parents separated when Jolie was six months old; the kids lived with Bertrand" to "After her parents' divorce in 1978" which the source you stuck this in front of disputes.
  • You changed the sourced statement of "Jolie has been long estranged from her father, though a reconciliation was attempted, and he appeared with her in Lara Croft: Tomb Raider (2001)" which was also supported by this source, which states "This comes as a bit of a surprise. While Jolie and Voight haven't been all that close over the years, I read that they had reconnected during the making of Lara Croft: Tomb Raider, in which Voight, at Jolie's suggestion, played her long-lost father. At the time, Jolie and Voight did interviews together, and it seemed like they had finally bonded" as well as the second source that I added after your first change, from here, which states about Voight "He and Jolie were reunited when they both worked on the film Tomb Raider but that they were no longer in contact." Both of those sources dispute your unsupported change and are related to a present source. When you change the content, you falsify the source.
• Please do not remove hidden notes left in articles, they are there for a reason. Editor consensus for this article includes the fact that Jolie doesn't refer to herself as an actress, but an actor. Don't change this back.
• Finally, the information about the Oscar nomination was put in a more appropriate location within the article.

Because this is a featured article, you really should bring up issues of content on the article talk page prior to inserting what you think is correct, especially when already present sources dispute your change. Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:37, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

See how you cannot leave the consensus determined reference to Jolie as an actor, which is what she calls herself, if you do not stop, it will be treated as vandalism and reported as such. You should perhaps review Wikipedia policy on consensus and editwarring. Wildhartlivie (talk) 00:44, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Madonna (entertainer). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Ward3001 (talk) 18:21, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Cher

You gave five sources?? Are you aware a person is only supposed to be editing with one username account? It was the account User:4Real182 that made the additions, and the explanation for the reversion is given on that talk page. If you are both User:Excuseme99 and User:4Real182, then I advise you to drop one or the other account or I will submit a sock puppet report. Wildhartlivie (talk) 09:38, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

I suggest you read a few Wikipedia policies, learn and live by them. WP:LEAD, WP:SOCK and WP:DISPUTE. If you cannot stop from coming in to an article you have been editing as your other account, User:4Real182, and reinsert information, including the same tired unreliable sources, such as www.everyhit.com, I will open a sock puppet case and you will be blocked from any further editing at its close. Your point of view editing is becoming quite tiresome, you do not understand what elements are involved in making a good article and your additions and edits most often are disruptive, POV and make assumptions that you can only prove by questionable sources. Stop editing in this way, you are not helpful. I am not the only editor who has taken exception to your edits and it's just time to stop. Wildhartlivie (talk) 06:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Cher. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Wildhartlivie (talk) 09:17, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Sock puppetry

I'm deadly serious. Either you back off of your contentiousness, or I will prepare a sock puppet case covering why the edits and points made by User:4Real182 have suddenly been taken over by you. It would also include the couple of times one of the accounts have shown up to support edits made the other. The case would result in your being blocked for sock puppetry and then you would not be able to edit at all. Also, in passing, when a number like "three" is used in a sentence here, you are supposed to use the numeral, not the word. Wildhartlivie (talk) 09:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC)