User talk:75.33.204.197: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 84.203.232.66 - "" |
→Date of Birth: word of warning |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
==Date of Birth== |
==Date of Birth== |
||
I just wanted to know why you don't want your birthdate to be known to the world Daeg? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/84.203.232.66|84.203.232.66]] ([[User talk:84.203.232.66|talk]]) 04:46, 28 May 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
I just wanted to know why you don't want your birthdate to be known to the world Daeg? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/84.203.232.66|84.203.232.66]] ([[User talk:84.203.232.66|talk]]) 04:46, 28 May 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
==Partial filmography== |
|||
I have removed your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Daeg_Faerch&diff=293109258&oldid=293104124 recent edit] to Daeg Faerch, which appeared to be a [[Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point|pointy]] exercise to deny notability to entries in that filmography. Such acts come pretty close to vandalism, and I urge you to refrain from them. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 15:48, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:48, 29 May 2009
February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Daeg Faerch has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 16:12, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. just64helpin (talk) 01:14, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Daeg Faerch. Thank you.--CyberGhostface (talk) 20:40, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Daeg Faerch. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --CyberGhostface (talk) 12:44, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Daeg Faerch, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --CyberGhostface (talk) 19:12, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Daeg Faerch has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. -download | sign! 03:26, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Manual of style
Please be aware that most material in Wikipedia eventually gets edited to conform to our Manual of Style and edits which diverge from the Manual of Style without otherwise improving the article tend to get reverted. The Manual of Style is broken up in to many sections; the most important for you are probably the main section, WP:MOS and the main biography section WP:MOSBIO.
I'll point out in particular that the latter says, in the section WP:MOSBIO#Subsequent uses of names: After the initial mention of any name, the person should be referred to by surname only, without an honorific prefix such as "Mr", "Mrs", "Miss", or "Ms". Thus, in the Daeg Faerch article, the article subject should be referred to as "Faerch" after the initial use of the name.
This isn't to say that contributions to Wikipedia must fit our style; rather, that such contributions will be edited to match the manual of style by regular Wikipedia editors.Studerby (talk) 18:50, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Date of Birth
I just wanted to know why you don't want your birthdate to be known to the world Daeg? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.203.232.66 (talk) 04:46, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Partial filmography
I have removed your recent edit to Daeg Faerch, which appeared to be a pointy exercise to deny notability to entries in that filmography. Such acts come pretty close to vandalism, and I urge you to refrain from them. Drmies (talk) 15:48, 29 May 2009 (UTC)