Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 June 14: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:23, 14 June 2009

< June 13	June 15 >

June 14

Peter Orszag photo2.jpg

File:Peter Orszag photo2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Orszag (notify | contribs).

Photo looks a bit too official for self-created work. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:32, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Cirt (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blanket - June 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PrinceParisBlanketMJ (notify | contribs).

No source information, no article. What is this? gordonrox24 (talk) 01:37, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Paris Jackson.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Cirt (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paris Jackson.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PrinceParisBlanketMJ (notify | contribs).

No source information. Article it is used on is at AFD with a WP:SNOW chance of staying on Wikipedia. gordonrox24 (talk) 01:41, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Blanket in las vegas.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Cirt (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blanket in las vegas.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PrinceParisBlanketMJ (notify | contribs).

No source info. Article that image is used in is at AFD and will be deleted. gordonrox24 (talk) 01:45, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Mithun-chakraborty-2.jpg

File:Mithun-chakraborty-2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Imortal4u (notify | contribs).

Low res, no meta-data, probably taken from elsewhere on the 'net. Even if not, description is "scanner", indicating this may be a scan of another image. J Milburn (talk) 08:55, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sinitta! - U.S. cover.jpg

File:Sinitta! - U.S. cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mlenooo (notify | contribs).

This cover is pretty much the same as the other, and the rerelease, let alone its cover, is not mentioned in the article. Use of this non-free image is not justified. J Milburn (talk) 09:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scanners screenshot.jpg

File:Scanners screenshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ed Fitzgerald (notify | contribs).

Image is being used merely to decorate the cast list section, and adds nothing to the article. J Milburn (talk) 09:06, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - On the contrary, the photograph identifies one of the major characters in the film, and also helps to illustrate the flat, direct and unadorned style of the film, and the overwrought style of the acting. The fact that the image is next tot he cast list is not particularly relevant - that's where there happened to be whitespace which could easily accomodate it, however the image illustrates the article as a whole and not that particular section. Ed Fitzgerald _{t / c} 09:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Not sure about this one, so .. per the image description page, I'll just "share my thoughts". The placement may suggest otherwise, but I can accept that the intention is not simply to decorate the cast list. Many film articles use at least one screenshot to give something of the look of the film. I'd feel more confident if the text was expanded to demonstrate the usefulness of this specific image, but I disagree that the use is only decorative or that it adds nothing to the article. I'm undecided, but I'd lean somewhat closer to keeping than to deleting. Rossrs (talk) 10:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hazrat Ali, Afghan politician.jpg

File:Hazrat Ali, Afghan politician.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Geo Swan (notify | contribs).

I uploaded this image, claiming "fair use". Fair use justification are only valid if there are no free alternatives. Since then I became aware of PD images of a "General Ali", from the same region as Hazrat Ali (File:General Ali and his Afghan fighters, November 2001.jpg, File:General Ali and his Afghan fighters, November 2001 b.jpg). General Ali looks like Hazrat Ali. I'd like more eyes on this. If these images are of the same individual then the "fair use" one should go. But the resemblance could merely be a family resemblance. Thanks. Geo Swan (talk) 16:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 51: / Line 51: @@
 *'''Keep''' - On the contrary, the photograph identifies one of the major characters in the film, and also helps to illustrate the flat, direct and unadorned style of the film, and the overwrought style of the acting.  The fact that the image is next tot he cast list is not particularly relevant - that's where there happened to be whitespace which could easily accomodate it, however the image illustrates '''''the article''''' as a whole and not that particular section. <span style="white-space:nowrap;"><b><i>[[User:Ed Fitzgerald|Ed Fitzgerald]]</i> <sub>[[User talk:Ed Fitzgerald|t]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ed Fitzgerald|c]]</sub></b></span> 09:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 *Comment: Not sure about this one, so .. per the image description page, I'll just "share my thoughts".  The placement may suggest otherwise, but I can accept that the intention is not simply to decorate the cast list.  Many film articles use at least one screenshot to give something of the look of the film.  I'd feel more confident if the text was expanded to demonstrate the usefulness of this specific image, but I disagree that the use is only decorative or that it adds nothing to the article.  I'm undecided, but I'd lean somewhat closer to keeping than to deleting.  [[User:Rossrs|Rossrs]] ([[User talk:Rossrs|talk]]) 10:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
+====[[:File:Hazrat Ali, Afghan politician.jpg|Hazrat Ali, Afghan politician.jpg]]====
+:<span class="plainlinksneverexpand lx">[[:File:{{ucfirst:Hazrat Ali, Afghan politician.jpg}}]] ([{{fullurl:File:Hazrat Ali, Afghan politician.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:[[Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 June 14]]}}}} delete] | [[File talk:{{ucfirst:Hazrat Ali, Afghan politician.jpg}}|talk]] | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Hazrat Ali, Afghan politician.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Hazrat Ali, Afghan politician.jpg}}}}}}} logs])</span> - uploaded by [[User talk:Geo Swan#File:Hazrat Ali, Afghan politician.jpg listed for deletion|Geo Swan]] (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:User_talk:Geo Swan|action=edit&preload=Template:idw_preload&editintro=Template:idw_editintro&section=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify]</span> | [[Special:Contributions/Geo Swan|contribs]]).
+*I uploaded this image, claiming "fair use".  Fair use justification are only valid if there are no free alternatives.  Since then I became aware of PD images of a "General Ali", from the same region as [[Hazrat Ali]] (<small>[[:File:General Ali and his Afghan fighters, November 2001.jpg]], [[:File:General Ali and his Afghan fighters, November 2001 b.jpg]]</small>).  General Ali ''looks like'' Hazrat Ali.  I'd like more eyes on this.  If these images are of the same individual then the "fair use" one should go.  But the resemblance could merely be a family resemblance.  Thanks. [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan|talk]]) 16:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC)