User talk:Thatcher: Difference between revisions
hee hee |
→Typo?: meh |
||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
I thought for a moment that I had missed some sort of fundamental change. [[User talk:Chillum|<font color='#C53F17'>'''Chillum'''</font>]] 02:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC) |
I thought for a moment that I had missed some sort of fundamental change. [[User talk:Chillum|<font color='#C53F17'>'''Chillum'''</font>]] 02:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
:Meh, I'm in front of the TV with my wife's laptop which I rarely use, watching Star Wars and Batman on split screen. I'm probably lucky I didn't suggest making arbcom mandatory for 'crats. [[User talk:Thatcher|Thatcher]] 02:57, 13 August 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:57, 13 August 2009
My admin actions |
---|
Contribs • Blocks • Protects • Deletions |
Admin links |
Noticeboard • Incidents • AIV • 3RR |
CSD • Prod • AfD |
Backlog • Images • RFU • Autoblocks |
Articles |
GAN • Criteria • Process • Content RFC |
Checkuser and Oversight |
Checkuser • Oversight log • Suppression log |
SUL tool • User rights • All range blocks |
Tor check • Geolocate • Geolocate • Honey pot |
RBL lookup • DNSstuff • Abusive Hosts |
Wikistalk tool • Single IP lookup |
Other wikis |
Quote • Meta • Commons |
Template links |
Piggybank • Tor list • Links |
Other |
Temp • Sandbox1 • Sandbox3 • Sandbox4 |
• Wikistalk • Wannabe Kate's tool • Prefix index |
• Contribs by page • Watchlist count |
Talk archives |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 |
Thanks
Thanks for resolving the User:Disinfoboxman issue. It is all so much better when things are clarified. Thank you for taking my concerns seriously. Regards, —Mattisse (Talk) 14:52, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Thatcher 14:57, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- "Resolved" on what basis?
- There never was any "User:Disinfoboxman issue"; there were simply groundless suspicions.
- Do checkusers get run these days on what User:Mattisse has disparagingly termed "harassing diffs", "hiding [Mattisse's] comments in a box", and commenting "frivolously". -- Disinfoboxman (talk) 17:12, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- Under the circumstances of confirmed sockpuppetry by one editor, and an account that seems more "experienced" than it's edit count would indicate, and with an interest in infoboxes and the passive voice [1] similar to Geogre, it was reasonable to take a look. You're not related, so no more needs to be said. Thatcher 17:26, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- Do checkusers get run these days on what User:Mattisse has disparagingly termed "harassing diffs", "hiding [Mattisse's] comments in a box", and commenting "frivolously". -- Disinfoboxman (talk) 17:12, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- "Confirmed sockpuppetry" verus "alternative account". Discuss.
- But "interest in infoboxes and the passive voice similar to Geogre"? That is most unsatisfactory. Similar to Bishonen; similar to Giano; similar a bunch of other people, and we are all partial to a spot of free range sarcasm and have a smattering of German too. I hope you enjoyed your fishing expedition. -- Disinfoboxman (talk) 17:56, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- See my statement on the motion re:sockpuppetry vs alternate account. I think it was an acceptable alternate account except for a few breaches. How serious those breaches were is a matter of individual opinion. Thatcher 19:28, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Verjakette/Capasitor
Hi. Since you have recently dealt with the new set of socks of Verjakette (Aparaj (talk · contribs), Greiwood (talk · contribs), etc), could you please check if Oceolcspsms (talk · contribs) is a reincarnation of Verjakette/Capasitor? The editing is very similar to that banned user. Lumberjak (talk · contribs) is also a suspicious account. Thanks. Grandmaster 09:45, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- Lumberjak is Confirmed, Oceolcspsms is probably unrelated. Thatcher 10:56, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Could you please check another suspicious account? The account of Lida Vorig (talk · contribs) was used for voting at AFD, and edit warring. It appears to be the same person. Thanks. Grandmaster 05:04, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Unrelated, but this user should be officially notified of the case restrictions. Ask at WP:AE. Thatcher 06:06, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Edit warring??? Where???? Oh and the AFD was closed and my vote did not count. Lida Vorig (talk) 20:10, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Enabled
I took care of that request you contacted me about, but I don't know how to contact you, other than through this page (or my own). Let me know how to proceed. Regards, Hamster Sandwich (talk) 22:48, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- OK, I've sent you a direct email. Thatcher 22:54, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- I replied, but I don,t see any activity on that users contribution page since '07. Regards, Hamster Sandwich (talk) 23:00, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Typo?
You said:
- "Users who resign permissions while named in a pending Arbitration request or an open case may not be reinstated with permission of Arbcom"
Did you mean:
- "Users who resign permissions while named in a pending Arbitration request or an open case may not be reinstated without permission of Arbcom"
Or perhaps I am misreading it? Chillum 02:28, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- No, I missed that. Thanks. Thatcher 02:44, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
I thought for a moment that I had missed some sort of fundamental change. Chillum 02:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Meh, I'm in front of the TV with my wife's laptop which I rarely use, watching Star Wars and Batman on split screen. I'm probably lucky I didn't suggest making arbcom mandatory for 'crats. Thatcher 02:57, 13 August 2009 (UTC)