Talk:1918 United Kingdom general election in Ireland: Difference between revisions
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
<blockquote>That the Catholic electorate was not simply voting for separation is revealed by comparing some results especially where both stood. In East Donegal the IPP got 7,596 votes (the Unionist 4,797) while Sinn Fein received 46, yet in South Donegal with no Unionist, it was 5,787 votes for Sinn Fein to 4,752 for the IPP. In Tyrone North East it was 56 for Sinn Fein against 7,596 for the IPP but in adjacent Tyrone North West where no Redmondite ran, Sinn Fein polled 10,442.</blockquote> |
<blockquote>That the Catholic electorate was not simply voting for separation is revealed by comparing some results especially where both stood. In East Donegal the IPP got 7,596 votes (the Unionist 4,797) while Sinn Fein received 46, yet in South Donegal with no Unionist, it was 5,787 votes for Sinn Fein to 4,752 for the IPP. In Tyrone North East it was 56 for Sinn Fein against 7,596 for the IPP but in adjacent Tyrone North West where no Redmondite ran, Sinn Fein polled 10,442.</blockquote> |
||
[http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=YyucGQD0oZYC&pg=PR7&lpg=PP1&dq=laffan+%22Resurrection+of+Ireland%22#v=onepage&q=donegal&f=false Here] (top result, page 165, having trouble linking to it direct) is the relevant passage (certainly regarding Donegal, I can find no results for either "North West Tyrone" or "Tyrone North West") from the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Irish_general_election%2C_1918&diff=309952471&oldid=309114172 book they claim in their edit summary sources their addition]. As you can see, the source does not make the analytical claims that the editor says it does? This edit has been [[User:O Fenian/Abuse#Warnings|warned many times]] about their edits, which include their [[User:O Fenian/Abuse#Example - Irish general election, 1918|many problematic edits to this article]]. This addition is OR, and should not remain in due to a grudge bearing admin who has an axe to grind after his very bad block of me was overturned. [[User:O Fenian|O Fenian]] ([[User talk:O Fenian|talk]]) 10:24, 26 August 2009 (UTC) |
[http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=YyucGQD0oZYC&pg=PR7&lpg=PP1&dq=laffan+%22Resurrection+of+Ireland%22#v=onepage&q=donegal&f=false Here] (top result, page 165, having trouble linking to it direct) is the relevant passage (certainly regarding Donegal, I can find no results for either "North West Tyrone" or "Tyrone North West") from the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Irish_general_election%2C_1918&diff=309952471&oldid=309114172 book they claim in their edit summary sources their addition]. As you can see, the source does not make the analytical claims that the editor says it does? This edit has been [[User:O Fenian/Abuse#Warnings|warned many times]] about their edits, which include their [[User:O Fenian/Abuse#Example - Irish general election, 1918|many problematic edits to this article]]. This addition is OR, and should not remain in due to a grudge bearing admin who has an axe to grind after his very bad block of me was overturned. [[User:O Fenian|O Fenian]] ([[User talk:O Fenian|talk]]) 10:24, 26 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
Read the changes O Fenian before you start lashing out. The article has moved on with the specific Ulster results detail now referenced not by Laffan but by arc.[[Special:Contributions/86.150.37.92|86.150.37.92]] ([[User talk:86.150.37.92|talk]]) 10:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:43, 26 August 2009
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Ireland B‑class Top‑importance | |||||||||
|
Note One
What is the source for this claim about the placing of a gun to an electoral officers head and the discovery of new ballots? Also, where did it happen?--John Carroll 11:58, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
Tim Pat Coogan, Michael Collins p.67. It was in the Longford by-election in 1917. In the words of the perpetuator, Alasdair MacCaba, "I jumped up on the platform, put a .45 to the head of the returning officer, clicked the hammer and told him to think again." FearÉIREANN\(talk) 20:41, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
mandate for war?
- Sinn Féin treated the result as a mandate from the Irish people to immediately set about establishing an independent, all-Ireland state, and to initiate an undeclared war of separation from Great Britain.
This isn't really true, is it? My understanding was that the media and the government incorrectly blamed SF for the militancy? Is the article being too simplistic in believing that SF and 'physical force republicanism' were one and the same? Aaron McDaid (talk - contribs) 12:23, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Elections in Independent Ireland category
Please stop adding Elections in Independent Ireland category to this page and to Irish general election 1921 page. Yes, Irish independence was proclaimed in 1916 and was declared by the 1st Dáil in January 1919 but that does not make it a reality. The Irish Republic states it existed from 1919 to 1922. The 1918 election was a UK one, run by the British government, how is this an election in an Independent Ireland? If a county is independent then it can run its own elections as the Free State government did in 1922. Also what about the people in Ireland who didn't recognise the Irish Republic and thought they were continuing to live in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. Another thing, the Irish War of Independence started in January 1919 (and ended in 1921), so how could an election in December 1918 be held in an Independent Ireland?
But rather than get into a revert war and discussions on when Ireland became independent, I think the categories should be re-organised.
The current structure is:
Elections by country [+] Elections in Ireland [+] Elections in the Republic of Ireland [+] Elections in independent Ireland
A better arrangement would be:
Elections by country [+] Elections in Ireland (all elections up to and including 1921) [+] Elections in independent Ireland (all elections from 1922 to 1948) [+] Elections in the Republic of Ireland (all elections from 1949)
It's not perfect, but the 1918 and 1921 elections would then reside in the Elections in Ireland only, conveniently, side stepping any potential POV issues like actual date of Independence. There are other issues like presidential elections, the first 2 are in independent Ireland, the rest in RoI category, not exactly ideal, they should surely be in the same category. The difficulty is in trying to come up with categories for the following periods of history:
- British rule, until 1916/1919/1922 (take your pick!)
- Irish Republic, 1919-1922
- Irish Free State, 1922-1937
- Ireland/Éire, 1937-1948
- Republic of Ireland, 1949-
All suggestions welcome! Snappy56 18:57, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Are we using British electorial history or are we using Irish Electoral History, Independence was declared in 1916, reconfirmed by the First Dáil Éireann after the 1918 General election, trying looking at the Dail database.--padraig 21:07, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
We are talking about reality based electoral history! IMHO, Irish independence was a process, starting with the Easter Rising and ending in the Anglo-Irish treaty. Ireland didn't magically become independent as soon as P.H. Pearse read the proclamation or happen when the 1st Dáil declared unilateral independence, these were steps on the way.
This text is from Irish Republic:
The goal of those who established the Irish Republic was to create a de facto independent republic comprising the whole island of Ireland. They failed in this goal, but the Irish Republic paved the way for the creation of the Irish Free State, a Commonwealth dominion with self-government, and a territory that extended to the 26 counties originally foreseen in the 1914 Home Rule Act. By 1949 the Free State became a fully independent republic, the 'Republic of Ireland'.
Speaking in the Dáil on 29 April 1997, Bertie Ahern, the leader of the Fianna Fáil party, which is the successor of the anti-treaty Sinn Féin, and the then Taoiseach (head of government) John Bruton, leader of the Fine Gael party, which is the successor of the pro-Treaty Sinn Féin, agreed that as a basis for inclusive commemoration, the date from which Irish independence should be measured was not the formation of the Irish Republic in 1919, but the 1922 establishment of the Irish Free State, the first modern Irish state to achieve de facto and de jure independence, and therefore international recognition.
This is the position of Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and presumably the other Dáil parties which makes it a majority position, so although you have a different opinion, you should respect the majority one. Btw, Do you have any suggestions for category changes? Snappy56 19:24, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Article title
This article is currently titled Irish (UK) general election, 1918. I can see a reason for the parenthesised "UK", since the election was organised as an election to the UK Parliament, but it's superfluous because there was no other general election in Ireland that year.
So I propose that the article should be moved to Irish general election, 1918, which is currently a redirect to Irish (UK) general election, 1918. Any objections? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- I would support that move as the 1918 election was the first election to Dáil Éireann.--padraig 11:19, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
O Fenian writes 'Unsourced claims and analysis' and reverts wholesale without even checking whether every change falls within these categories. Anyway the entire article is unsourced and full of analysis bar five small referenced items. So leave it be O Fenian. Only remove what you believe is either wrong or contentious. 81.129.245.63 (talk) 11:18, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- No thank you, as disruptive trolls do not get to dictate that policies to not apply to their edits. O Fenian (talk) 16:42, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
O Fenian - Could you write coherent English rather than screech. I have no idea what you are saying except I hear what you are about. No assessment of the changes involved just abuse in the hope that your patrolling and reversions will win out. 81.153.148.246 (talk) 22:33, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- During your lengthy time as a disruptive troll, you have received countless warnings about unsourced content. I suggest you take heed of them .O Fenian (talk) 22:54, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
O Fenian - only threats and abuse, never proper assessment of the additions I make.
Nitpicking and fault finding is your stock in trade. Hopefully Wikipedia is bigger than you. You revert even spelling corrections in your rush to justice. 81.153.148.246 (talk) 20:09, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Your current additions are original research. I have also checked Laffan, and your edits are unacceptable. Please provide quotes and page numbers to substantiate any changes you wish to make prior to making them. O Fenian (talk) 19:16, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
"It should be borne in mind that there was a limited electoral pact between SF and Nationalists; the Nationalists gave SF a clear run in Tyrone North-West and instructed their supporters to vote SF in Fermanagh South and Londonderry City; meanwhile SF instructed their supporters to vote Nationalist in Armagh South, Down South, Tyrone North-East and Donegal East. The pact broke down in Down East where a Unionist won by splitting the difference. For the six counties which formed the future Northern Ireland, the total vote was:" ACTUAL VOTES FOLLOW - http://www.ark.ac.uk/elections/h1918.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.43.236.11 (talk) 08:16, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- That does not source the changes you have made, and it is not from Laffan. You allege Laffan supports the changes you made, either provide quotes from Laffan or it will be assumed you are falsifying sources and further action taking accordingly. O Fenian (talk) 10:17, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Moronic protection
![]() | It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at 1918 United Kingdom general election in Ireland. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
Please remove the original research added in this edit.
That the Catholic electorate was not simply voting for separation is revealed by comparing some results especially where both stood. In East Donegal the IPP got 7,596 votes (the Unionist 4,797) while Sinn Fein received 46, yet in South Donegal with no Unionist, it was 5,787 votes for Sinn Fein to 4,752 for the IPP. In Tyrone North East it was 56 for Sinn Fein against 7,596 for the IPP but in adjacent Tyrone North West where no Redmondite ran, Sinn Fein polled 10,442.
Here (top result, page 165, having trouble linking to it direct) is the relevant passage (certainly regarding Donegal, I can find no results for either "North West Tyrone" or "Tyrone North West") from the book they claim in their edit summary sources their addition. As you can see, the source does not make the analytical claims that the editor says it does? This edit has been warned many times about their edits, which include their many problematic edits to this article. This addition is OR, and should not remain in due to a grudge bearing admin who has an axe to grind after his very bad block of me was overturned. O Fenian (talk) 10:24, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Read the changes O Fenian before you start lashing out. The article has moved on with the specific Ulster results detail now referenced not by Laffan but by arc.86.150.37.92 (talk) 10:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)