Jump to content

User talk:Xook1kai Choa6aur: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notice
Line 77: Line 77:


:Yes, perhaps you could discuss your changes on [[Talk:Archaea]]? [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers|talk]]) 02:16, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
:Yes, perhaps you could discuss your changes on [[Talk:Archaea]]? [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers|talk]]) 02:16, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

==[[DNA sequencing]]==
Along similar lines, the same goes for your edits to the DNA sequencing page. I find it very hard to identify legitimate concerns you may have with the content or structure of the page because of all the poorly worded changes you propose as alternatives. If you have suggestions on how to improve the article but are limited by language skills, the best way seems to be to go to the talk page and explain what you would like to see changed. Focussing on one or two pages at a time is probably better than trying to work on very many at once, as you seem to be currently doing. Thanks. [[User:Malljaja|Malljaja]] ([[User talk:Malljaja|talk]]) 15:09, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
:Please refrain from removing content from your talk page; in addition, it is not good etiquette to leave comments like this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMalljaja&diff=310378183&oldid=310377184 one]. These may be grounds for a report at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents|ANI]]. Now for the errors, here are more than one: you inserted a superfluous hyphen in "sequencing methods". "The goal of DNA sequencing is to read the [[genetic information]] in the [[genetic code|DNA code of life]]"—this sentence is inaccurate, since sequencing does not read the information in the genetic code; instead it reads the order of bases, which may be used to infer protein sequences by '''using''' the rules of the genetic code. "DNA concentration is adjusted so only one DNA particle replicate in one droplet." DNA is not a particle, and "replicate" should be "replicates". "metagenomic library may be usefful in sequencing very long or repetable DNA pieces on low troughput equipment." Sentence is truncated, nonsensical, and contains several errors (usefful, repetable). [[User:Malljaja|Malljaja]] ([[User talk:Malljaja|talk]]) 16:02, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
::My patience with you is at its end. In light of your repeated nonsensical edits, refusal to discuss matters at talk pages, removing my previous comments from your talk page, and pending your further behaviour, I may report you to [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents|ANI]]. [[User:Malljaja|Malljaja]] ([[User talk:Malljaja|talk]]) 21:00, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:00, 27 August 2009

Welcome!

Hello, Xook1kai Choa6aur! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Decibert (talk) 00:56, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Use the talk page please

Hi, can you please try to explain your edits on the article talkpages? I am referring to your edits c on Genetic history of Europe, but looking through your contributions I think you are generally heading for trouble unless you learn to do this.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 18:41, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits have introduced multiple grammatical errors and removed information. Please note the policy WP:3R, which you are in danger of violating. --EncycloPetey (talk) 01:46, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, perhaps you could discuss your changes on Talk:Archaea? Tim Vickers (talk) 02:16, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Along similar lines, the same goes for your edits to the DNA sequencing page. I find it very hard to identify legitimate concerns you may have with the content or structure of the page because of all the poorly worded changes you propose as alternatives. If you have suggestions on how to improve the article but are limited by language skills, the best way seems to be to go to the talk page and explain what you would like to see changed. Focussing on one or two pages at a time is probably better than trying to work on very many at once, as you seem to be currently doing. Thanks. Malljaja (talk) 15:09, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from removing content from your talk page; in addition, it is not good etiquette to leave comments like this one. These may be grounds for a report at ANI. Now for the errors, here are more than one: you inserted a superfluous hyphen in "sequencing methods". "The goal of DNA sequencing is to read the genetic information in the DNA code of life"—this sentence is inaccurate, since sequencing does not read the information in the genetic code; instead it reads the order of bases, which may be used to infer protein sequences by using the rules of the genetic code. "DNA concentration is adjusted so only one DNA particle replicate in one droplet." DNA is not a particle, and "replicate" should be "replicates". "metagenomic library may be usefful in sequencing very long or repetable DNA pieces on low troughput equipment." Sentence is truncated, nonsensical, and contains several errors (usefful, repetable). Malljaja (talk) 16:02, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My patience with you is at its end. In light of your repeated nonsensical edits, refusal to discuss matters at talk pages, removing my previous comments from your talk page, and pending your further behaviour, I may report you to ANI. Malljaja (talk) 21:00, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]