Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psyced: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 00:48, 28 September 2009

Psyced

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Unsourced. Wikipedia is not a software directory. Miami33139 (talk) 17:43, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep since it's a recognised server software, under its previous name psycMUVE you can find more references.[1] Historically, this software is around since the 90s, was used by MTV Europe[2] and BrasNET.[3]. As a historical side note the original author brought the action command (/ME) to IRC.[4] Technically, Psyced works as a bridge between it's native PSYC protocol and various other chat/messenging networks (e.g. IRC, XMPP, webchat), not many open source projects offer this functionality. 83.254.210.47 (talk) 18:48, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Being "recognized server software" is not a reason Wikipedia keeps articles. A search on Swedish Google, a wiki, a doc site, and another wiki are not reliable sources. Miami33139 (talk) 03:17, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Your deletion suggest should be rejected for formal reasons, you did not research the artcile's notability properly and still refuse to. The first link I provided points to more sources. Please do not mass-suggest articles to AfD in areas you are unfamiliar with, because other editors have to spend time to rescue articles that shouldn't be here in the first place. 83.254.210.47 (talk) 08:39, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 00:29, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, plenty of sources out there, not nn by any means. -- Oldlaptop321 (talk · contribs) 21:17, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If sources satisfying WP:N exist, please bring them forward. Google is not finding them, and I'm not seeing them. Remember there has to be enough to write a decent article about the software, not just a listing of its features. Wikipedia is not a catalog for software, after all. Ray^Talk 02:13, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If there are "plenty of sources out there", put your money where your proverbial mouth is and demonstrate that. I'm not seeing it. JBsupreme (talk) 22:18, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 00:48, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 *'''Delete''' If sources satisfying [[WP:N]] exist, please bring them forward. Google is not finding them, and I'm not seeing them. Remember there has to be enough to write a decent article ''about'' the software, not just a listing of its features. Wikipedia is not a catalog for software, after all. <strong>[[User:RayAYang|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:DarkRed">Ray</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:RayAYang|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 02:13, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 *'''Delete'''.  If there are "plenty of sources out there", put your money where your proverbial mouth is and demonstrate that.  I'm not seeing it.  [[User:JBsupreme|JBsupreme]] ([[User talk:JBsupreme|talk]]) 22:18, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''': I can't find [[WP:N|significant coverage]] for this software. [[User:Joe Chill|Joe Chill]] ([[User talk:Joe Chill|talk]]) 00:48, 28 September 2009 (UTC)