Horseshoe theory: Difference between revisions
DanielRigal (talk | contribs) rm nonnotable bloggers and pundits. Please note that this blogger Leon Bertrand is NOT the notable politician Léon Bertrand being spuriously linked. |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Horseshoe theory competes with the conventional [[Left-right politics|linear left-right continuum]] system as well as the [[political spectrum|various multidimensional systems]]. Proponents of the theory point to similarities between the extreme left and the extreme right. |
Horseshoe theory competes with the conventional [[Left-right politics|linear left-right continuum]] system as well as the [[political spectrum|various multidimensional systems]]. Proponents of the theory point to similarities between the extreme left and the extreme right. |
||
== |
==Modern uses== |
||
More recently, the term has been used when comparing [[Antisemitism|hostility towards Jews]] from both the [[far left]] and the [[far right]] (see [[New antisemitism]]).<ref>{{cite news |first= |last= |authorlink= |coauthors= |title=The Political Horseshoe again |url=http://www.aijac.org.au/review/2006/31-11/scribb31-11.htm |quote=I think Mr. Loewenstein has done a good job demonstrating why many people believe, as the “political horseshoe” theory states, that there is a lot more common ground between the far left, where Loewenstein dwells politically, and the far right views of someone like Betty Luks than people on the left would care to admit. |work=[[AIJAC]] |date= |accessdate=2009-02-13 }}</ref> |
More recently, the term has been used when comparing [[Antisemitism|hostility towards Jews]] from both the [[far left]] and the [[far right]] (see [[New antisemitism]]).<ref>{{cite news |first= |last= |authorlink= |coauthors= |title=The Political Horseshoe again |url=http://www.aijac.org.au/review/2006/31-11/scribb31-11.htm |quote=I think Mr. Loewenstein has done a good job demonstrating why many people believe, as the “political horseshoe” theory states, that there is a lot more common ground between the far left, where Loewenstein dwells politically, and the far right views of someone like Betty Luks than people on the left would care to admit. |work=[[AIJAC]] |date= |accessdate=2009-02-13 }}</ref> |
||
Similarly, one blogger in response to the the [[Community Security Trust]]'s 2009 report observed that "The source of the attacks and abuse seems spread fairly evenly over far-right white supremacists, and Islamists and leftists" [http://www.hurryupharry.org/2010/02/05/depressing-report-on-antisemitism/]. |
|||
In an essay by Josef Joffe of [[Roland Berger Strategy Consultants]], one of the largest strategy consultancies in the world it is written that: |
|||
''Will globalization survive the gloom? The creeping revolt against globalization actually preceded the Crash of '08. Everywhere in the West, populism began to show its angry face at mid-decade. The two most dramatic instances were Germany and Austria, where populist parties scored big with a message of isolationism, protectionism and redistribution. In Germany, it was left-wing populism ("Die Linke"); in Austria it was a bunch of right-wing parties that garnered almost 30% in the 2008 election. Left and right together illustrated once more the "horseshoe" theory of modern politics: As the iron is bent backward, the two extremes almost touch.'' [http://www.rolandberger.com/news/2008-12-22-rbsc-news-NewYearEssay.html] |
|||
The Horseshoe theory has been recognised as a valid political term by the prestigious website Political Science Scholar [http://politicalsciencescholar.com/political-science-terms/]. |
|||
== Criticism == |
== Criticism == |
||
Revision as of 09:56, 7 February 2010
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (February 2009) |
The horseshoe theory in political science asserts that rather than the far left and the far right being at opposite and opposing ends of a linear political continuum, they in fact closely resemble one another, much like the ends of a horseshoe. The theory is attributed to Jean-Pierre Faye.[1]
Horseshoe theory competes with the conventional linear left-right continuum system as well as the various multidimensional systems. Proponents of the theory point to similarities between the extreme left and the extreme right.
Modern uses
More recently, the term has been used when comparing hostility towards Jews from both the far left and the far right (see New antisemitism).[2]
Similarly, one blogger in response to the the Community Security Trust's 2009 report observed that "The source of the attacks and abuse seems spread fairly evenly over far-right white supremacists, and Islamists and leftists" [1].
In an essay by Josef Joffe of Roland Berger Strategy Consultants, one of the largest strategy consultancies in the world it is written that:
Will globalization survive the gloom? The creeping revolt against globalization actually preceded the Crash of '08. Everywhere in the West, populism began to show its angry face at mid-decade. The two most dramatic instances were Germany and Austria, where populist parties scored big with a message of isolationism, protectionism and redistribution. In Germany, it was left-wing populism ("Die Linke"); in Austria it was a bunch of right-wing parties that garnered almost 30% in the 2008 election. Left and right together illustrated once more the "horseshoe" theory of modern politics: As the iron is bent backward, the two extremes almost touch. [2]
The Horseshoe theory has been recognised as a valid political term by the prestigious website Political Science Scholar [3].
Criticism
Critics of the theory have suggested that many sociologists consider the Horseshoe theory to have been discredited[3].
In University of Reading academic Peter Barker's[4], book GDR and Its History, Peter Thompson[5] of the University of Sheffield observes that the theory is "increasingly orthodox", and describes the theory as seeing "left and right-wing parties being closer to each other than the centre". He dissents from the theory objecting that it fails to take into account the unbroken continuum of political thought.[6].
See also
- Left-right politics
- Nolan Chart
- Political compass
- Pournelle chart
- Political spectrum
- Blair's Law
- Socialist Alternative - allegations of anti-semitism
References
- ^ Encel, Frédéric (2004-11-13). "United States-Israel: A friendship that needs to be demystified". Le Figaro. Paris. Archived from the original on 2007-09-30. Retrieved 2009-02-13.
Jean-Pierre Faye's famous horseshoe theory (according to which extremes meet) finds verification here more than in other places, and the two states of delirium often mingle and meet, unfortunately spreading beyond these extremist circles. But contrary to the legend deliberately maintained and/or the commonplace believed in good faith, Israel and the United States have not always been allies; on several occasions their relations have even been strained.
{{cite news}}: Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help) - ^ "The Political Horseshoe again". AIJAC. Retrieved 2009-02-13.
I think Mr. Loewenstein has done a good job demonstrating why many people believe, as the "political horseshoe" theory states, that there is a lot more common ground between the far left, where Loewenstein dwells politically, and the far right views of someone like Betty Luks than people on the left would care to admit.
{{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=(help) - ^ Political Research Associates: Study the U.S. Political Right
- ^ University of Reading: Peter Barker
- ^ University of Sheffield: Peter Thompson
- ^ GDR and Its History pp103