Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Roxx Regime Demos: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{Reflist}} |
{{Reflist}} |
||
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Albums and songs|list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 14:24, 21 April 2010 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Albums and songs|list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 14:24, 21 April 2010 (UTC)</small> |
||
:*'''Comment''' None of those sources establish notability, simply the existence of the demo, which was never in doubt. In point of fact, [http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:3bfoxzu5ldje one of your sources] explicitly states that it's a demo (in addition to the name of the album, of course), and notes that it's only for die-hard fans. Since it's a self-released demo, it is assumed non-notable by [[WP:MUSIC]]. —[[User:Koavf|Justin (koavf)]]❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯ 02:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep''' per Amsaim above. The nominator is hunting down articles with "demo" in the title or text and proposing deletion without further investigation. Or if he is investigating, he isn't saying any more than "assumed non notable..." The guideline on demos exists and should be observed, but the fact that guideline does not define what a demo IS should allow for some flexibility in special cases like one. <font face="Calibri">[[User:Doomsdayer520|<font color="MediumSeaGreen">'''D<small>OOMSDAYER</small>520'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Doomsdayer520|Talk]]|[[ Special:Contributions/Doomsdayer520|Contribs]])</font> 01:32, 25 April 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' per Amsaim above. The nominator is hunting down articles with "demo" in the title or text and proposing deletion without further investigation. Or if he is investigating, he isn't saying any more than "assumed non notable..." The guideline on demos exists and should be observed, but the fact that guideline does not define what a demo IS should allow for some flexibility in special cases like one. <font face="Calibri">[[User:Doomsdayer520|<font color="MediumSeaGreen">'''D<small>OOMSDAYER</small>520'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Doomsdayer520|Talk]]|[[ Special:Contributions/Doomsdayer520|Contribs]])</font> 01:32, 25 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
:*'''Comment''' Are you doubting that this is a demo album or are you granting that it is, but is somehow notable? —[[User:Koavf|Justin (koavf)]]❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯ 02:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:01, 25 April 2010
- The Roxx Regime Demos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Demos are assumed non-notable per WP:MUSIC. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:02, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Keep - Wikipedia's guideline for album notability: "In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia." This is an official Stryper album, consisting of songs from Stryper's pre-Stryper days, when they called themselves The Roxx Regime. This is not a demo. The album was released on 7 July 2007 by Stryper.[1][2][3][4][5] Notability is thusly established. The editor who placed this article in AfD is ignoring the provided reliable verifiable sources on the talk page and the article itself which show that "The Roxx Regime Demos" is not a demo, but is an album released in 2007 by Stryper. Amsaim (talk) 09:02, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- ^ "Stryper Discography on Official Website". Stryper. Retrieved 21 April 2010.
- ^ "The Roxx Regime Demos - AllMusic.com Review". AllMusic.com. Retrieved 21 April 2010.
- ^ "Stryper Discography at RollingStone.com". RollingStone.com. Retrieved 26 March 2010.
- ^ "Stryper - Discography". MetalMusicArchives.com. Retrieved 21 April 2010.
- ^ "Stryper - Complete Album Discography". Spirit of Metal Webzine. Retrieved 21 April 2010.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- Comment None of those sources establish notability, simply the existence of the demo, which was never in doubt. In point of fact, one of your sources explicitly states that it's a demo (in addition to the name of the album, of course), and notes that it's only for die-hard fans. Since it's a self-released demo, it is assumed non-notable by WP:MUSIC. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep per Amsaim above. The nominator is hunting down articles with "demo" in the title or text and proposing deletion without further investigation. Or if he is investigating, he isn't saying any more than "assumed non notable..." The guideline on demos exists and should be observed, but the fact that guideline does not define what a demo IS should allow for some flexibility in special cases like one. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 01:32, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Are you doubting that this is a demo album or are you granting that it is, but is somehow notable? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC)