User talk:MLKLewis: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:31, 8 October 2010

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, MLKLewis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Werner Erhard. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Cirt (talk) 00:08, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ney v. Landmark Education Corporation and Werner Erhard

Hi there. Thanks for your input at Talk:Ney v. Landmark Education Corporation and Werner Erhard/GA1. I have undertaken a GA review there - you may wish to check it out. There is also an interchange there which explains that several of us interpreted your comments as not being the actual GA review - i hope you agree we read the situation correctly. Regards, hamiltonstone (talk) 00:40, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of sourced material from page List of Scientologists

Please, do not remove sourced information from pages on Wikipedia without discussion, as you have done at the page, List of Scientologists. Thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 00:56, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit it appears you have removed any mention that Werner Erhard received Scientology "Auditing", with an edit summary that does not mention your removal of sourced information. Your edit summary of "clarifying exact dates according to references" neglects to mention this. -- Cirt (talk) 01:00, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Query

And in addition there are publications that say he was not a scientologist including: The Press ^[1] and Le Matin (Switzerland) ^[2]

Could you please provide the relevant text of these two articles that applies here? Thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 02:44, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Insertion of jargon and loaded language at Erhard Seminars Training

Please stop inserting jargon and loaded language used by the est Erhard Seminars Training organization, at the article on the group Erhard Seminars Training. Please engage in discussion, at Talk:Erhard Seminars Training. Thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 20:14, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation and plagiarism

This edit and this edit are copyright violation and plagiarism. Please do not do this again. Thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 22:31, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

^ VANCE Michael. "PUTTING IT RIGHT." The Press. Independent Newspapers Limited. 4 March 2009 http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-19954849.html
^ Le Matin, August 8, 2007

[1] VANCE Michael. "PUTTING IT RIGHT." The Press. Independent Newspapers Limited. 4 March 2009 http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-19954849.html

[2] Le Matin, August 8, 2007

[1]

[2]

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 *Please stop inserting [[jargon]] and [[loaded language]] used by the ''est'' Erhard Seminars Training organization, at the article on the group [[Erhard Seminars Training]]. Please engage in discussion, at [[Talk:Erhard Seminars Training]]. Thank you, -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 20:14, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
+== Copyright violation and plagiarism ==
+[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Erhard_Seminars_Training&diff=389556759&oldid=386706980 This] edit and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Erhard_Seminars_Training&diff=389565258&oldid=389557247 this edit] are [[copyright violation]] and [[plagiarism]]. Please do not do this again. Thank you, -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 22:31, 8 October 2010 (UTC)