Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cart00ney: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
David Gerard (talk | contribs) Apparent lazy or bad-faith nomination |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*'''Delete''' neologism.--<font color="#4b0082">'''[[User:Mitsukai|み使い]]''' </font>'''''[[User_talk:Mitsukai|Mitsukai]]''''' 15:20, 10 February 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' neologism.--<font color="#4b0082">'''[[User:Mitsukai|み使い]]''' </font>'''''[[User_talk:Mitsukai|Mitsukai]]''''' 15:20, 10 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' as neologism. --[[User:Terenceong1992|Ter]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e]]</font>[[User:Terenceong1992|nc]][[User talk:Terenceong1992|e Ong]] ([[Chinese New Year greetings|恭喜发财]]) 15:40, 10 February 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' as neologism. --[[User:Terenceong1992|Ter]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e]]</font>[[User:Terenceong1992|nc]][[User talk:Terenceong1992|e Ong]] ([[Chinese New Year greetings|恭喜发财]]) 15:40, 10 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
* '''Apparent lazy or bad faith nomination''' of a work in progress nine minutes after its creation [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-February/039529.html]. I've also mentioned this on [[WT:AFD]]. See also previous discussions on WT:AFD of how AFD is in danger of getting external controls placed on it by the Foundation in reaction to the remarkably bad public relations the standard of conduct on AFD causes with the outside world. Did you make ''any'' good-faith attempt effort to contact the creator, an editor in good standing with a long contribution history? You might think a nomination is no big deal, but the actual content creators frequently feel differently - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] 16:07, 10 February 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:07, 10 February 2006
apparent nn selfref neologism Savidan 15:11, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete neologism.--み使い Mitsukai 15:20, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as neologism. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 15:40, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
- Apparent lazy or bad faith nomination of a work in progress nine minutes after its creation [1]. I've also mentioned this on WT:AFD. See also previous discussions on WT:AFD of how AFD is in danger of getting external controls placed on it by the Foundation in reaction to the remarkably bad public relations the standard of conduct on AFD causes with the outside world. Did you make any good-faith attempt effort to contact the creator, an editor in good standing with a long contribution history? You might think a nomination is no big deal, but the actual content creators frequently feel differently - David Gerard 16:07, 10 February 2006 (UTC)