Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford: Difference between revisions
→Coming of age: L George Delves (new page) |
|||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
:<blockquote>The first, second and third of May 1571 was holden at Westminster before the Queen's Majesty a solemn joust at the tilt, tourney and barriers. The challengers were Edward, Earl of Oxford, Charles Howard, [[Sir Henry Lee]], and [[Christopher Hatton]], esquire, who all did very valiantly, but the chief honour was given to the Earl of Oxford.<ref>{{Harvnb|Nelson|2003|pp=69–70}}</ref></blockquote> |
:<blockquote>The first, second and third of May 1571 was holden at Westminster before the Queen's Majesty a solemn joust at the tilt, tourney and barriers. The challengers were Edward, Earl of Oxford, Charles Howard, [[Sir Henry Lee]], and [[Christopher Hatton]], esquire, who all did very valiantly, but the chief honour was given to the Earl of Oxford.<ref>{{Harvnb|Nelson|2003|pp=69–70}}</ref></blockquote> |
||
On 24 June George Delves, one of the defenders in the tournament, wrote to the [[Edward Manners, 3rd Earl of Rutland|Earl of Rutland]] that 'There is no man of life and agility in every respect in the Court but the Earl of Oxford'.<ref>{{Harvnb|Nelson|2003|p=70}}</ref> |
On 24 June [[George Delves]], one of the defenders in the tournament, wrote to the [[Edward Manners, 3rd Earl of Rutland|Earl of Rutland]] that 'There is no man of life and agility in every respect in the Court but the Earl of Oxford'.<ref>{{Harvnb|Nelson|2003|p=70}}</ref> |
||
Sir William Cecil was raised to the peerage on 25 February 1571 as Lord Burghley, and by the summer of that year Oxford was betrothed to Burghley's 14-year-old daughter, [[Anne Cecil|Anne]]. Lord St. John announced the news in a letter to the Earl of Rutland on 28 July 1571: |
Sir William Cecil was raised to the peerage on 25 February 1571 as Lord Burghley, and by the summer of that year Oxford was betrothed to Burghley's 14-year-old daughter, [[Anne Cecil|Anne]]. Lord St. John announced the news in a letter to the Earl of Rutland on 28 July 1571: |
Revision as of 22:02, 18 December 2010
Edward de Vere | |
---|---|
Earl of Oxford | |
![]() Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford, unknown artist after lost original, 1575, National Portrait Gallery, London | |
Tenure | 1562–1604 |
Other titles | Viscount Bulbeck |
Born | 12 April 1550 Castle Hedingham, Essex |
Died | 24 June 1604 (aged 54) Kings Place in Hackney |
Nationality | English |
Locality | Essex |
Offices | Lord Great Chamberlain |
Spouse(s) | Anne Cecil Elizabeth Trentham |
Issue | Elizabeth Stanley, Countess of Derby Bridget Norris, Countess of Berkshire Susan Herbert, Countess of Montgomery Henry de Vere, 18th Earl of Oxford Sir Edward Vere (illegitimate) |
Parents | John de Vere, 16th Earl of Oxford Margery Golding |
Signature | ![]() |
Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford (12 April 1550–24 June 1604) was an Elizabethan courtier, playwright, lyric poet, sportsman and patron of the arts, and is presently the most popular alternative candidate proposed for the authorship of Shakespeare's works.
Oxford was the only son of John de Vere, 16th Earl of Oxford and Margery Golding. After the death of his father on 3 August 1562 he became a ward of Queen Elizabeth, and received an excellent education in the household of her Principal Secretary, Sir William Cecil.[1] He was a champion jouster,[2] travelled widely throughout Europe, and participated in military campaigns after the Northern Rebellion, with the English forces in Flanders, and during the Armada invasion.
Oxford was noted for his literary and theatrical patronage. Between 1564 and 1599 some 28 books were dedicated to him, including works by Golding, Lyly, Greene and Munday.[3] He held the lease of the first Blackfriars Theatre in the mid-1580s, produced entertainments at Court, and sponsored companies of players and musicians.[4][5]
Early life
Heir to the second oldest continuously inherited earldom in England,[6] Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford, was born 12 April 1550,[7], the only son of John de Vere, 16th Earl of Oxford and his second wife, Margery Golding (d.1568). He had a younger sister, Mary (d.1624), born about 1554,[8] and an older half-sister, Katherine (1538–1600), the daughter of his father's first marriage to Dorothy Neville (d.1548).[9] Baptised Edward, a name unique in the de Vere family, perhaps as a compliment to the then king Edward VI,[10] de Vere was styled Viscount Bulbeck, and raised in the Reformed Faith. Although the 16th Earl's support for Queen Mary was instrumental in her accession to the throne, he was given no preferment during her reign.[11] He was a sportsman and hunter of note, and among his son's earliest accomplishments were mastery of riding, shooting and hawking. The 16th Earl's circle included his brothers-in-law, the poets Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey, and Edmund Sheffield, 1st Baron Sheffield, and the translator, Arthur Golding. He was one of the small number of noblemen who retained a company of actors.[12][13]
Oxford's earliest tutor was Thomas Fowle, a former fellow of St John's College, Cambridge, to whom the 16th Earl granted an annuity on 4 May 1558 'for service in teaching Edward Vere, my son, Viscount Bulbeck, done & to be done'.[14] In November of that year, Oxford matriculated as an impubes, or fellow-commoner, of Queens' College, Cambridge.[7] In January 1559 he was also admitted as a fellow commoner of St John's, while remaining resident at Queens'. His name disappears from the Queens' college registers in March 1559, and he did not graduate BA in the Lent term of 1562.[15] Oxford was also tutored by Sir Thomas Smith and resided for a time in Smith's household.[16] The evidence as to when Oxford resided with Smith is unclear, however, and Smith was not among those granted annuities by the 16th Earl.[17]
Wardship
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2f/William_Cecil_Lord_Burghley_1571.jpg/220px-William_Cecil_Lord_Burghley_1571.jpg)
On the death of his father on 3 August 1562, the twelve-year-old Oxford became the 17th Earl of Oxford and Lord Great Chamberlain of England. Because the 16th Earl held land from the Crown by knight service, Oxford became a royal ward of the young Queen Elizabeth, and was placed in the household of Sir William Cecil, Secretary of State and Master of the Court of Wards.[18] Under Cecil's supervision Oxford studied French, Latin, writing, drawing, cosmography, dancing, riding and shooting.[19] The first of Oxford's extant letters, dated 23 August 1563, is in French.[20] During his first year at Cecil House Oxford was tutored by Laurence Nowell, one of the founding fathers of Anglo-Saxon studies.[21]
In 1563 the legitimacy of the marriage of Oxford’s parents was challenged in the ecclesiastical courts by a petition to Archbishop Matthew Parker filed by Oxford’s half-sister, Katherine, then the wife of Edward Windsor, 3rd Baron Windsor (c. 1532-1575). On 28 June 1563 Oxford’s maternal uncle Arthur Golding replied on behalf of Oxford and his sister, Mary, requesting the Archbishop to stay the petition on the ground that legal proceedings against a ward of the Queen could not be maintained in any other court without prior licence from the Court of Wards and Liveries.[22] At some time before October in the same year,[23] Oxford's mother, Margery, Countess of Oxford, remarried. Her second husband was the Queen's Gentleman Pensioner, Charles Tyrrell.[24]
In May 1564 Arthur Golding published his Th’ Abridgement of the Histories of Trogus Pompeius. Although he originally intended it for the 16th Earl, Golding dedicated it to his young nephew, attributing to him an interest in ancient history and contemporary events.[25] The dedication reads in part:
It is not unknown to others, and I have had experience thereof myself, how earnest a desire your Honour hath naturally grafted in you to read, peruse and communicate with others, as well as the histories of ancient times and things done long ago, as also the present estate of things in our days, and that not without a certain pregnancy of wit and ripeness of understanding.[26]
On 10 August 1564 Oxford was among 17 noblemen, knights and esquires in the Queen's entourage who were awarded the honorary degree of Master of Arts by the University of Cambridge. On 6 September 1566 Oxford and others accompanying the Queen were granted honorary M.A. degrees by the University of Oxford.[7][27] On 1 February 1567 he was admitted to Gray's Inn.[28]
On 23 July 1567 Oxford killed Thomas Brincknell, an under-cook in the Cecil household, while practising fencing with Edward Baynham, a Westminster tailor, in the backyard of Cecil House in the Strand. At the coroner's inquest held the following day, the 17 jurymen found that Brincknell was drunk, and had caused his own death. Sir William Cecil later recorded the event in a note in his retrospective diary:
Thomas Brincknell, an under-cook, was hurt by the Earl of Oxford at Cecil House, whereof he died, and by a verdict found felo de se with running upon a point of a fence sword of the said Earl.[29]
Cecil also later wrote that 'I did my best to have the jury find the death of a poor man whom he killed in my house to be found se defendendo'.[30]
By an indenture of 1 July 1562 the 16th Earl had contracted with Henry Hastings, 3rd Earl of Huntingdon for a marriage for Oxford with one of Huntingdon's sisters. The indenture provided that when he reached the age of 18 in 1568 Oxford could choose to marry either Elizabeth or Mary Hastings. However after the death of the 16th Earl the indenture lapsed. Elizabeth Hastings later married Edward Somerset, while Mary Hastings died unmarried. In the same year Oxford's mother died on 2 December 1568. She is said to have been buried at Earls Colne.[31]
On 22 April 1569 Oxford received his first vote, cast by Lord Charles Howard, for membership in the Order of the Garter, a dignity he was never to attain, although he received many votes over the years.[32]
Records of books purchased for Oxford in 1569 attest to his continued interest in history, as well as literature and philosophy. Among them were editions of Chaucer, Plutarch (in French), two books in Italian, and folio editions of Cicero and Plato (probably in Latin).[33] In the same year Thomas Underdowne dedicated his translation of the Æthiopian History of Heliodorus to Oxford, praising his 'haughty courage', 'great skill' and 'sufficiency of learning'.[34]
In November the Northern Rebellion broke out, and on 24 November 1569 Oxford, newly recovered from an illness, wrote to Cecil reminding him that in the past 'you have given me your good word to have me see the wars and services in strange and foreign places [and] sith you could not then obtain me licence of the Queen's Majesty, now you will do me so much honour as that, by your purchase of my licence, I may be called to the service of my prince and country, as at this present troublous time a number are'. The French ambassador to England, de la Mothe Fenelon, reported to the French King on 15 February and 21 March 1570 that Oxford was also seeking service in the French wars of religion at this time. It was not until the following spring, however, that Oxford's request for military service was granted. On 30 March 1570 Cecil wrote to Sir William Damsell, Receiver-General of the Court of Wards, instructing him to deliver £40 to Oxford as the Queen was sending him 'into the north parts to remain with my Lord of Sussex, and to be employed there in her Majesty's service'.[35]
In 1570 Oxford's stepfather, Charles Tyrrell, was buried at Kingston-upon-Thames. In his will he bequeathed 'unto the Earl of Oxford one great horse that his lordship gave me'.[36] In the same year Oxford wrote 'favourable letters' for the mathematician and astrologer Dr. John Dee. The letters have not survived, and are only known through Dee's reference to them in a book published in 1592.[37]
About 1570 Edmund Elviden dedicated to Oxford his The Most Excellent and Pleasant Metaphorical History of Pesistratus and Catanea.[38]
Coming of age
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/81/The_Old_Palace_of_Whitehall_by_Hendrik_Danckerts.jpg/450px-The_Old_Palace_of_Whitehall_by_Hendrik_Danckerts.jpg)
On 12 April 1571 Oxford reached the age of majority, and took his seat in the House of Lords.[7] In May he was one of the challengers in a tournament described in Stow's Annals:
The first, second and third of May 1571 was holden at Westminster before the Queen's Majesty a solemn joust at the tilt, tourney and barriers. The challengers were Edward, Earl of Oxford, Charles Howard, Sir Henry Lee, and Christopher Hatton, esquire, who all did very valiantly, but the chief honour was given to the Earl of Oxford.[39]
On 24 June George Delves, one of the defenders in the tournament, wrote to the Earl of Rutland that 'There is no man of life and agility in every respect in the Court but the Earl of Oxford'.[40]
Sir William Cecil was raised to the peerage on 25 February 1571 as Lord Burghley, and by the summer of that year Oxford was betrothed to Burghley's 14-year-old daughter, Anne. Lord St. John announced the news in a letter to the Earl of Rutland on 28 July 1571:
Th’ Earl of Oxenford hath gotten him a wife – or at the least a wife hath caught him – that is Mistress Anne Cecil, whereunto the Queen hath given her consent, the which hath caused great weeping, wailing and sorrowful cheer of those that hoped to have had that golden day.[41]
Lord Burghley himself wrote to Rutland on 15 August:
I think it doth seem strange to your Lordship to hear of a purposed determination in my Lord of Oxford to marry with my daughter, and so before his Lordship moved it to me I might have thought it if any other had moved it to me himself. For at his own motion I could not well imagine what to think, considering I never meant to seek it nor hoped of it. And yet reason moved me to think well of my Lord, and to acknowledge myself greatly beholden to him, as indeed I am.[42]
The wedding took place on 16 December 1571 at Whitehall, and as Oxford's uncle, George Golding, noted 'the same day, year and place the Lord Herbert, son and heir of the Earl of Worcester did marry the Lady Hastings, sister to Henry, Earl of Huntingdon', one of the Hastings sisters whom Oxford's father, the 16th Earl, had chosen to be Oxford's bride.[43] Anne brought Oxford a dowry of £3000, and Oxford assigned Anne a jointure of £669 6s 8d.[44]
Although he had reached the age of majority and had married, Oxford was still not in possession of his inheritance. After suing his livery,[45] Oxford was licenced to enter on his lands on 30 May 1572.[46] However this privilege came at a price. The fines assessed against Oxford in the Court of Wards included £2000 for his wardship and marriage, £1257 18s 3/4d for his livery, and £48 19s 9-1/4d for mean rates, a total of £3306 17s 10d.[citation needed] To guarantee payment, Oxford entered into bonds to the Court of Wards totalling £11,000.[citation needed] Oxford's own bonds to the Court of Wards were in turn guaranteed by bonds to the Court of Wards in the amount of £5000 apiece entered into by two guarantors, John, Lord Darcy of Chiche, and Sir William Waldegrave.[47] In return for these guarantees, Oxford had entered into two statutes of £6000 apiece to Darcy and Waldegrave.[citation needed]
Having sued his livery, Oxford was entitled to yearly revenues from his lands and the office of Lord Great Chamberlain of approximately £2200,[citation needed] although he was not entitled to the income from the estates comprising his mother's jointure until after her death in 1568[citation needed] nor to the income from certain estates set aside to pay his father's debts until 1583.[48]
In August 1571 Oxford attended on Paul de Foix, who had come to England to negotiate a marriage between the Queen and the Duke of Anjou, the future King Henry III of France.[49]
On 20 October 1571 Arthur Golding dedicated a second book to Oxford, his The Psalms of David and others, with M. John Calvin’s Commentaries.[50]
In early 1572 Oxford wrote a Latin epistle to Bartholomew Clerke’s De Curiali, a translation into Latin of Baldassare Castiglione’s Il Cortegiano,[51] and in the same year Thomas Twyne dedicated his Breviary of Britain to Oxford, noting that 'your Honour taketh singular delight' in 'books of geography, histories and other good learning.[52]
On 2 June 1572 one of Oxford's closest kinsmen, his first cousin, Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk was executed on Tower Hill. Oxford had petitioned both the Queen and Lord Burghley on Norfolk's behalf, and it was also reported that he had provided a ship to help Norfolk escape to Spain.[53]
In 1573 Oxford wrote a commendatory letter and verses for his friend Thomas Bedingfield's Cardanus’ Comfort, a translation from the Latin of De Consolatione by the Italian mathematician and physician Girolamo Cardano.[54]
On 11 May 1573 Gilbert Talbot wrote to his father, the Earl of Shrewsbury, of the Queen's favour towards Oxford:
My Lord of Oxford is lately grown into great credit, for the Queen's Majesty delighteth more in his personage and his dancing and valiantness than any other. I think Sussex doth back him all that he can; if it were not for his fickle head, he would pass any of them shortly. My Lady Burghley unwisely has declared herself, as it were, jealous, which is come to the Queen's ear, whereat she has been not a little offended with her, but now she is reconciled again.[55]
Allusive language in a letter from Sir Christopher Hatton to the Queen in June 1573 suggests rivalry between Hatton and Oxford for the Queen's favour ('reserve it to the sheep; he hath no tooth to bite where the boar's tusk may both raze and tear').[56]
In the summer of 1573 Oxford made plans to travel abroad. In a document prepared in anticipation of his foreign travel, he estimated his current debts to be £6000. For reasons which are unclear the trip did not transpire.[57]
In 1574 Oxford's surgeon, George Baker, dedicated to him a work containing two translations, The Composition or Making of . . . Oleum Magistrale, and The Third Book of Galen.[58]
In a letter to his father on 28 June 1574 Gilbert Talbot reported discord between Oxford and the Queen:
The young Earl of Oxford, of that ancient and Very family of the Veres, had a cause or suit that now came before the Queen, which she did not answer so favourably as was expected, checking him, it seems for his unthriftiness. And hereupon his behaviour before her gave some offence.[59]
Three days later, on 1 July 1574, Oxford left England without licence, reportedly travelling to Calais in the company of Lord Edward Seymour (1548–1574), and from thence to Flanders, and 'carrying a great sum of money with him'. The Queen recalled him, and Oxford was back in England by 28 July. Although the Queen's displeasure was somewhat mollified by his return, it was reported that she 'doth not mean to wrap up his contempt without using some kind of reprehension, that he may not think but that his fault is not only to be reproved, but were also to be corrected'. By 21 August Oxford had won back the Queen's favour because of his loyalty to her when approached by her exiled rebel subjects in Flanders, and had secured from her a promise to grant him licence to travel.[60]
Foreign travel
The Queen issued Oxford's licence to travel on 24 January 1575, and provided him with letters of introduction to foreign monarchs.[61] Prior to his departure Oxford entered into two indentures. By the first indenture, dated 20 January 1575, he sold his manors in Cornwall, Staffordshire and Wiltshire to three trustees for £6000.[62] By the second indenture, dated 30 January, he settled the lands of the earldom should he die abroad without heirs and provided for payment of debts in an attached schedule amounting to £9096 10s 8/12d, of which sum £3457 was owed to the Queen in the Court of Wards.[63][64] Oxford left England in the first week of February, and on 6 March was presented by Dr. Valentine Dale to the French King and Queen, who 'used him honourably'.[65] In mid-March he travelled to Strasbourg, where he met with the scholar Sturmius,[66] and from thence he made his way to Venice via Milan.[67] On 3 January 1576 Oxford wrote to Lord Burghley from Siena mentioning complaints that had reached him concerning the demands of his creditors, including the Queen and his sister, and directing that more of his land be sold to pay them.[68] On 2 March 1576 Oxford's licence to travel was renewed for a further year, but for unknown reasons Oxford left Venice on 5 March, intending to return home by way of Lyons and Paris.[69]
On Oxford's return across the Channel in April, his ship was hijacked by pirates from Flushing, who according to the French ambassador, Mauvissiere, took his possessions, stripped him to his shirt, and might have murdered him had not one of them recognized him.[70]
During Oxford's absence from England, his wife, Anne, had given birth to a daughter, Elizabeth, on 2 July 1575.[71] The news of Anne's pregnancy had reached Oxford on 17 March 1575 while he was in Paris, at which time he wrote to Lord Burghley expressing his pleasure that what Lord Burghley had mentioned doubtfully in an earlier letter had turned out to be true:
My Lord, your letters have made me a glad man, for these last have put me in assurance of that good fortune which your former mentioned doubtfully. I thank God therefore with your Lordship that it hath pleased him to make me a father where your Lordship is a grandfather. And if it be a boy I shall likewise be the partaker with you in a greater contentation. But thereby to take an occasion to return, I am far off from that opinion, for now it hath pleased God to give me a son of mine own (as I hope it is), methinks I have the better occasion to travel sith whatsoever becometh of me I leave behind me one to supply my duty and service either to my prince or else my country.[72]
Although Elizabeth was born at the beginning of July, for unexplained reasons Oxford did not learn of the birth until 24 September.[72] When he returned to England, he refused to live with his wife and took rooms at Charing Cross. Although he never named the cause openly, Oxford appears to have been told that Anne's daughter, Elizabeth, was not his child.[73] The most Oxford would allow himself to say on the subject to Lord Burghley was that:
Until I can better satisfy or advertise myself of some mislikes I am not determined as touching my wife to accompany her. What they are, because some are not to be spoken of or written upon as imperfections, I will not deal withal; some that otherways discontent me I will not blaze or publish until it please me. And last of all, I mean not to weary myself any more with such troubles and molestations as I have endured.[74]
Numerous memoranda compiled by Lord Burghley at the time reveal a flood of complaints by Oxford against his wife's family, but the crux of the matter seems to have been his unspoken conviction that Anne's daughter, Elizabeth, was not his child.[75] He allowed Anne to attend the Queen at court, but only when he himself was not present, and stipulated that Lord Burghley must make no further appeals to him on Anne's behalf.[76]
Courtier
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7a/Elizabeth1_Phoenix.jpg/220px-Elizabeth1_Phoenix.jpg)
In 1576 eight poems by Oxford were published in The Paradise of Dainty Devises, a collection in which all the poems were meant to be sung.[77][78][79] Oxford's eight poems in the Paradise 'create a dramatic break with everything known to have been written at the Elizabethan court up to that time.'[80]
On 16 February 1577 Thomas Screven reported to the Earl of Rutland a rumour that Oxford's sister Mary would marry Lord Gerald Fitzgerald (1559–1580). By 2 July, however, the Duchess of Suffolk reported in a letter to Lord Burghley that 'my wise son has gone very far with my Lady Mary Vere, I fear too far to turn'. Although both the Duchess and her husband Richard Bertie initially opposed the marriage, and both Oxford and the Queen withheld their consent for a time, Mary was married to Peregrine Bertie, later Lord Willoughby d'Eresby, sometime after Christmas 1577 and before 12 March 1578.[81]
Although details are unclear, there is evidence that in 1577 Oxford was again attempting to see service in the French wars of religion on the side of King Henri III.[82]
In 1577 John Brooke dedicated to Oxford a translation entitled The Staff of Christian Faith, 'the only work by the popular writer Guy de Brès to be printed in English'.[83]
In July of the same year John Stanhope wrote to Lord Burghley indicating that as a result of Oxford's suit to the Queen for the grant of Castle Rising, a property which had been forfeited to the Crown on Norfolk's attainder in 1572, 'some unkindness and strangeness ensueth betwixt my Lord of Surrey, my Lord Harry, and his Lordship'.[84]
In 1577 Oxford had invested £25 in the second of Martin Frobisher’s expeditions in search of the Northwest Passage. In 1578 he sank £3000 into the third expedition. The ‘gold’ ore brought back by Frobisher turned out to be worthless, and Oxford lost his entire investment.[85]
On 15 December 1577 the Duchess of Suffolk wrote to Lord Burghley describing a plan she and Oxford's sister Mary had devised so that Oxford could see his daughter Elizabeth.[86] Whether the scheme came to fruition is unknown.
On 14 January 1578, the Queen's grant of Castle Rising to Oxford was finalized.[87] As noted earlier, Oxford had sold his inherited lands in Cornwall, Staffordshire and Wiltshire prior to his continental tour. On his return to England in 1576 he sold his manors in Devonshire. Sales continued apace in the following two years, and by the end of 1578 he had sold at least 7 more manors, including his recent grant of Castle Rising.[88]
In the summer of 1578 Oxford attended the Queen on her progress through East Anglia.[89] The royal party stayed at Lord Henry Howard's residence at Audley End from 26–31 July, where Gabriel Harvey dedicated his Gratulationes Valdinenses to the Queen. The volume consists of four ‘books’, the first addressed to the Queen, the second to Leicester, the third to Lord Burghley, and the fourth to Oxford, Sir Christopher Hatton, and Philip Sidney. Harvey's encomium to Oxford is double-edged, praising his English and Latin verse and prose while encouraging him to 'put away your feeble pen, your bloodless books, your impractical writings'.[90] A contretemps occurred during the progress in mid-August when the Queen twice requested Oxford to dance before the French ambassadors Bacqueville and Quissy, who were in England to negotiate a marriage between the Queen and the Duke of Alencon. Oxford refused on the ground that he 'would not give pleasure to Frenchmen'.[90]
In a letter of 5 March 1579 Gilbert Talbot wrote to his father of a 'show' presented by Oxford and his kinsmen before the Queen:
It is but vain to trouble your Lordship with such shows as was showed before her Majesty this Shrovetide at night. The chiefest was a device presented by the persons of th' Earl of Oxford, th' Earl of Surrey, the Lords Thomas Howard & Windsor. The device was prettier than it had hap to be performed, but the best of it (& I think the best liked) was two rich jewels which was presented to her Majesty by the 2 Earls.[91]
On 8 April the Spanish ambassador, Mendoza, wrote to King Philip of Spain that it had been proposed that if Alencon were to travel to England in connection with negotiations for his marriage to the Queen, Oxford, Surrey and Windsor should be hostages for his safe return.[91] Alencon himself did not arrive in England until the end of August, but his ambassadors were in England from the 15th to the 27th of that month. Oxford was sympathetic to the proposed marriage, but Leicester and his nephew Philip Sidney were adamantly opposed to it. This difference of opinion may have triggered the well known quarrel between Oxford and Sidney on the tennis court at Whitehall. The most detailed version of the quarrel survives in the account of Sidney's friend, Fulke Greville. It is not entirely clear from Greville's account who was playing on the court when the quarrel erupted. What is clear is that Oxford 'scornfully call[ed] Sir Philip by the name of puppy', and that Sidney responded by giving Oxford the lie, averring that 'all the world knows puppies are gotten by dogs, and children by men'. All this was overheard by the French ambassadors, who 'had that day audience in those private galleries whose windows looked into the tennis court'. What happened next is not entirely clear from the conflicting accounts, but it appears that whether it was Sidney who challenged Oxford to a duel or the other way around, Oxford failed to take the duel any further, and the Queen personally took Sidney to task for not recognizing the difference between his status and Oxford's. Sir Christopher Hatton and Sidney's friend Hubert Languet also tried to dissuade Sidney from pursuing the matter, and it was eventually dropped.[92]
Oxford was also in confrontation with Leicester about this time. A memorandum from 1579 details 'Articles whereof Oxford would have accused Leicester', and Oxford was confined to his chamber at Greenwich for a time 'about the libelling between him and my Lord of Leicester'.[93]
In 1579 two works were dedicated to Oxford, Geoffrey Gates' Defense of Military Profession, and Anthony Munday's Mirror of Mutability.[94]
In the summer of 1580 Gabriel Harvey, apparently motivated by a desire to ingratiate himself with Leicester,[95] satirized Oxford in verses entitled Speculum Tuscanismi in Three Proper and Witty Familiar Letters.[96] Over a decade later, Harvey's satire was pilloried in Thomas Nashe's Strange News in 1592:
Needs he must cast up certain crude humours of English hexameter verses that lay upon his stomach; a nobleman stood in his way as he was vomiting, and from top to toe he all-to-bewrayed him with Tuscanism.[97]
On 27 January 1580 Arthur Throckmorton wrote in his diary that Oxford had written a challenge to Sidney, and that on the 29th Oxford had been commanded to keep his chamber, not being released until 11 February. The cause of the challenge and of Oxford's confinement to quarters by the Queen is unknown.[98]
By April 1580, Oxford had taken over the Earl of Warwick's playing company:
The Duttons and their fellow-players forsaking the Earl of Warwick, their master, became followers of the Earl of Oxford and wrote themselves his comedians, which certain gentlemen altered and made chameleons.[99]
The company may have included the famous comedian, Richard Tarleton.[100] At this time Oxford also patronized boy actors, as indicated by an entry for 1580-1 recording payment for a performance in Bristol of 'my Lord of Oxford's players', consisting of '1 man and 9 boys'.[101]
On 9 June 1580 Lord Burghley wrote to John Hatcher, Vice-chancellor of the University of Cambridge, requesting that Oxford's Men be allowed to 'repair to that university and there to make show of such plays and interludes as have been heretofore played by them publicly, as well before the Queen's Majesty as in the city of London'. Hatcher denied the request, citing various reasons.[102]
On 15 June 1580 Oxford purchased a tenement and seven acres of land near Aldgate in London from the Italian merchant Benedict Spinola for £2500. The property was known as the Great Garden of Christchurch in the parish of St Botolphs, London, and had formerly belonged to Magdalene College, Cambridge.[103][104]
Sometime in 1580 Oxford also purchased a London residence, a mansion in Bishopsgate known as Fisher's Folly. According to Lord Henry Howard, writing to the Queen in early January 1581, Oxford had paid a large sum for the property and for renovations to it.[105]
In 1580 three works were dedicated to Oxford, John Hester's A Short Discourse . . . of Leonardo Fioravanti, Bolognese, upon Surgery,[106] John Lyly's Euphues and his England, and Anthony Munday's Zelauto. In the dedication to Zelauto, Munday also mentioned having delivered the now lost Galien of France to Oxford for his 'courteous and gentle perusing'. Both Lyly and Munday were in Oxford's service at the time, Lyly dedicating his book to 'my very good Lord and master, Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxenford', and Munday identifying himself on the title page as 'Servant to the Right Honourable the Earl of Oxenford'.[107][108] In addition, in his A Light Bundle of Lively Discourses Called Churchyard's Charge, and A Pleasant Labyrinth Called Churchyard's Chance, Thomas Churchyard promised to dedicate future works to Oxford.[109]
Banishment from court
In a letter dated 11 January 1581 to King Henri III, the French ambassador Mauvissiere relayed a report that after his return from Italy in 1576 Oxford had made profession of the Catholic religion with some of his relatives and best friends, and that just recently, in late December 1580, Oxford had denounced three of his Catholic friends, Lord Henry Howard, Charles Arundel, and Francis Southwell, to the Queen.[110] According to Bossy, Leicester had 'dislodged Oxford from the pro-French group', that is, the group at court which favoured Queen Elizabeth's marriage to the Duke of Alencon, and had 'persuaded him to make a public confession to the Queen in the ambassador's presence, accusing his former friends of becoming reconciled to Rome and conspiring against the state'. Peck concurs, stating that Leicester was 'intent upon rendering Sussex's allies politically useless'.[111] The Spanish ambassador, Mendoza, was also of the view that Leicester was involved, and that the incident revolved around his opposition to the Queen's projected marriage to Alencon.
A few days ago the Queen took into custody Milord Harry Howard, brother of the Duke of Norfolk, and two other gentlemen, Charles Arundel and Southwell, who were among the most esteemed in her court, and another gentleman having accused them, their great friend, of having received the Holy Sacrament and heard Mass and of reconciling themselves to the Roman Catholic Church four years ago. The three are suspected of treating with familiarity with the ambassador of France and to desire to effect the marriage with Alencon, along with the ladies of the court who were of like affection, and favourites of the Queen. What adds to the mystery of the matter is that they were carried to the Tower, Leicester's having spread the rumour that they were plotting a massacre of the Protestants, beginning with the Queen. His object in this is to inflame the people against them and against the French, as well as against the Earl of Sussex who was their close friend.[111]
The Privy Council ordered the arrest of Howard and Arundel,[112] and Oxford met secretly with Arundel to enlist his support for Oxford's allegations against Howard and Southwell.[112] According to his own later accounts of their meeting, Arundel refused Oxford's offer, and he and Howard sought asylum with the Spanish ambassador, Mendoza, who later wrote to King Philip of Spain that:
[Howard and Arundel] had been in close communication with the French ambassador, but they did not dare to trust him at this juncture, and feared that they would be taken to the Tower and their lives be sacrificed. They therefore came to me in their peril, and asked me to hide them and save their lives. As they were Catholics, I detained them without anyone in the house knowing of it excepting one servant until their friend the Councillor informed them that they would only be placed under arrest in a gentleman's house, whereupon they immediately showed themselves in public.[113]
Howard and Arundel were interrogated, and released from the Tower to the custody of members of the Privy Council.[114] During the first weeks after their arrest they issued a stream of allegations against Oxford in pursuit of a threefold strategy by which they would admit to minor crimes, discredit Oxford as a witness against them, and demonstrate that Oxford posed a danger to the Crown.[115] Despite these efforts, Howard remained under house arrest into August, while Arundel was not freed from house arrest until October or November.[116]
In the meantime Oxford was at liberty, and won the prize at a tournament at Westminster on 22 January 1581. His page's speech at the tournament, describing Oxford's appearance as the Knight of the Tree of the Sun, was published in 1592 in a pamphlet entitled Plato, Axiochus.[117]
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e9/AnneVavasour.jpg/220px-AnneVavasour.jpg)
Oxford's triumph was short-lived. On 23 March 1581 Walsingham advised the Earl of Huntingdon that on 21 March Anne Vavasour, one of the Queen's Maids of Honour, had given birth to a son, and that 'the Earl of Oxford is avowed to be the father, who hath withdrawn himself with intent, as it is thought, to pass the seas'. Oxford was captured and imprisoned in the Tower, as was Anne for a time.[118] On 9 June the Privy Council wrote to Sir William Gorges that Oxford had been released from the Tower the previous day.[119] While Oxford was under house arrest in May 1581, Thomas Stocker dedicated to him his Divers Sermons of Master John Calvin, stating in the dedication that he had been 'brought up in your Lordship's father's house'.[120] Oxford was still under house arrest in mid-July, but took part in an Accession Day tournament at Whitehall on 17 November 1581.[121]
After a five year separation, Oxford reconciled with his wife, Anne, at Christmas 1581.[122] However his affair with Anne Vavasour continued to have repercussions. In March 1582 there was a fray in the streets of London between Oxford and Anne's uncle, Sir Thomas Knyvet. Richard Madox reported that 'my Lord of Oxford fought with Mr Knyvet about the quarrel of Besse Bavisar, and was hurt, and Gerret his man slain', while Nicholas Faunt wrote to Anthony Bacon that both men were hurt, 'but my Lord of Oxford more dangerously' adding that 'Mr Knyvet is not meanly beloved in Court, and therefore he is not like to speed ill, whatsoever the quarrel be'.[123] In a letter to Lord Burghley on 25 March 1595 Oxford offered to attend Lord Burghley at his house 'as well as a lame man might',[124] but whether his lameness resulted from the injuries sustained in the fray with Knyvet is unknown. There was another fray between Knyvet's and Oxford's men on 18 June, and a third on 22 June in which it was reported that Knyvet had 'slain a man of the Earl of Oxford's in a fight'.[125]
In this troubled period Thomas Watson dedicated his Hekatompathia or Passionate Century of Love to Oxford, stating in the dedication that Oxford had taken a personal interest in the work:
For since the world hath understood (I know not how) that your Honour had willingly vouchsafed the acceptance of this work, and at convenient leisures favourably perused it, being as yet but in written hand, many have oftentimes and earnestly called upon me to put it to the press, that for their money they might but see what your Lordship with some liking had already perused.[126]
Meanwhile the frays continued. Another of Oxford's men was slain on 21 February 1583,[127] and on 12 March Lord Burghley wrote to Sir Christopher Hatton mentioning the death of one of Knyvet's men, and thanking Hatton for his efforts 'to bring some good end to these troublesome matters betwixt my Lord and Oxford and Mr Thomas Knyvet'.[128]
On 6 May 1583 Nicholas Faunt wrote to Anthony Bacon that 'God had sent my Lord of Oxford a son, but hath taken it away from him'. Oxford and Anne's infant son was buried at Castle Hedingham on 9 May.[129]
Oxford's two-year banishment from court ended a month after the death of his son. On 2 June 1583 Roger Manners wrote to the Earl of Rutland that Oxford had come to the Queen's presence, and 'after some bitter words and speeches, in the end all sins are forgiven, and he may repair to the court at his pleasure. Mr Raleigh was a great mean herein'.[130] As May notes, however, Oxford never regained his position as a courtier of the first magnitude.[131]
Middle years
On 6 April 1584, Oxford and Anne's daughter, Bridget, was born.[132]
In 1584 two works were dedicated to Oxford, Robert Greene's Gwydonius; The Card of Fancy, and John Southern's Pandora.[133]
Oxford's financial situation was steadily deteriorating. By the mid-1580s Oxford had sold almost all his inherited lands, alienating his principal source of income.[134] Moreover, as he stated in a letter to Lord Burghley on 30 October 1584, as a result of these sales he had:
entered into a great number of bonds to such as have purchased lands of me to discharge them of all encumbrances, and because I stand indebted unto her Majesty, as your Lordship knoweth, many of the said purchasers do greatly fear some trouble likely to fall upon them by reason of her Majesty's said debt, & especially if the bonds of the Lord Darcy and Sir William Waldegrave should be extended for the same, who have two several statutes of great sums for their discharge, whereupon many of the said purchasers have been suitors unto me to procure the discharging of her Majesty's said debt, and do seem very willing to bear the burden thereof if by my means the same might be stalled payable at some convenient days.[47]
Because Oxford's lands were security for his unpaid debt to the Queen in the Court of Wards, Oxford had had to enter into bonds to the purchasers as a guarantee that he would indemnify them if the Queen were to extend against the lands for his debt. To avoid this eventuality, the purchasers of his lands were willing to repay Oxford's debt to the Court of Wards if he could persuade the Queen to let them do so by instalments.[135]
During the mid-1580s Oxford's Men continued to perform at court. 'The Earl of Oxford his servants' received £20, paid to John Lyly for performances on 1 January and 3 March 1584, and at Christmas that year Henry Evans received payment 'for one play . . . by the children of th' Earl of Oxford'.[101] On 1 January 1585 a troupe performed at court under the name of 'John Symons and other his fellows, servants to th' Earl of Oxford'.[136] The company also had success touring the country, as indicated in records of performances from the years 1580 through 1587.[137] Oxford's Men were also one of the four principal companies performing in London. On 25 January 1587, Maliverny Catlyn complained to Sir Francis Walsingham that:
The daily abuse of stage plays is such an offence to the godly and so great a hindrance to the Gospel as the papists do exceedingly rejoice at the blemish thereof, and not without cause, for every day in the week the players' bills are set up in sundry places of the city, some in the name of her Majesty's men, some the Earl of Leicester's, some the Earl of Oxford's, the lord Admiral's, & divers others, so that when the bells toll to the lectures, the trumpets sound to the stages, whereat the wicked faction of Rome laugheth for joy while the godly weep for sorrow.[138]
Oxford's company of boy players was also still in existence. According to Chambers, the companies working at the Blackfriars theatre under Lyly and Evans in 1583-4 were 'a combination of Oxford's boys, Paul's and the Chapel'.[136] In a document dating from about 1585, Sir William More of Loseley complained about the manner in which the Blackfriars had gotten into the hands of a succession of sub-lessees, including Oxford and Lyly, after More had leased it to Richard Farrant:
Immediately after, [Anne Farrant] let the house to one Hunnis, and afterward to one Newman or Sutton, as far as I remember, and then to Evans, who sold his interest to the Earl of Oxford, who gave his interest to Lyly, and the title thus was posted over from one to another from me, contrary to the said condition.[139]
Oxford also patronized a company of musicians, as evidenced by payments in 1584-5 by the cities of Oxford and Barnstaple to 'the Earl of Oxford's musicians'.[136]
On 19 January 1585 Anne Vavasour's brother Thomas sent Oxford a written challenge, which Oxford appears to have ignored.[140]
In 1585 negotiations were underway for King James to come to England to discuss the release of his mother, Mary, Queen of Scots, and on 4 March Mendoza wrote to the King of Spain that Oxford was to be sent to Scotland as one of the hostages for the King's safety.[141]
In late summer of that year Oxford was commissioned to command a company of horse in the Low Countries. On 9 September it was reported that "five or six thousand English soldiers have arrived in Flanders with the earl of Oxford and Colonel Norris, and it is said that Sir Philip Sidney will follow them shortly to take possession of Flushing, ... and the earl of Leicester will then follow as chief of the expedition."[142] On 21 October William Davison reported that "My Lord of Oxford is returned this night into England, upon what humour I know not."[143]
On 25 June 1586 the Queen granted Oxford an annuity of £1000 a year 'to be continued unto him during our pleasure or until such time as he shall be by us otherwise provided for to be in some manner relieved, at what time our pleasure is that this payment of one thousand pounds yearly to our said cousin in manner above specified shall cease'.[144]
In October of that year Oxford was at Fotheringay Castle in Northamptonshire for the trial of Mary, Queen of Scots, and was among the peers who on 13 October 'went unto her in her lodging', and 'remained with her almost the space of two hours, signifying unto her that if she would not come forth before the Commissioners they would proceed against her' in her absence.[145]
In 1586 Angel Day dedicated to Oxford his The English Secretary, the first epistolary manual for writing model letters in English, noting that Oxford was one 'whose infancy from the beginning was ever sacred to the Muses'.[146][147] In the same year William Webbe wrote in his Discourse of English Poetry that:
I may not omit the deserved commendations of many honourable and noble Lords and gentlemen in her Majesty's court which in the rare devices of poetry have been and yet are most excellent skilful, among whom the right honourable Earl of Oxford may challenge to himself the title of the most excellent among the rest.[148]
Oxford and Anne's daughter Susan was born on 26 May 1587.
On 1 July 1587 the Queen granted Oxford lands which had belonged to Edward Jones, who had been attainted and executed for his part in the Babington plot. The grant was made in the name of two trustees in order to protect it from Oxford's creditors.[149]
On 12 September 1587, Oxford and Anne's daughter, Frances, was buried at Edmonton. Although her birthdate is unknown, she must have been between one and three years of age.[150]
Earlier in the year a plan had finally been devised for the purchasers of Oxford's lands to pay his debt to the Court of Wards, and on 29 November 'the decree was made whereby the Earl's whole debt of £3306 18s 9-1/4d was appointed to be paid by the purchasers' over a five-year period, finishing in 1592.[150] By 1 July 1591 only £800 remained unpaid.[48]
On 5 June 1588 Oxford's first wife, Anne, died at court of a fever at the age of 31. Her tomb in Westminster Abbey records that she was 'the mother of several sons', indicating that the infant who died in 1583 was not her only son by Oxford.[151]
In July and August 1588 England was threatened by the Spanish Armada. Richard Hakluyt lists Oxford as among those 'great and honourable personages' who flocked to the English Channel to serve prince and country,[152] and the manuscript of a pamphlet published in 1588 contains an interlineation in Lord Burghley's hand stating that "the Earl of Oxford also in this time repaired to the sea coast for service of the Queen in the navy".[153] The nature of Oxford's service is unclear. On 28 July Leicester, who was in overall command of the English land troops, advised Walsingham that Oxford had gone to London "for his armour and furniture" and would return to Tilbury. Leicester asked for instructions, stating that "I trust he be free to go to the enemy, for he seems most willing to hazard his life in this quarrel".[154] On 1 August Leicester wrote to Walsingham that the Queen had consented to allow Oxford to serve and that:
she was pleased that he should have the government of Harwich ... a place of trust & of great danger. My Lord seemed at first to like well of it, afterward he came to me & told me he thought that place of no service nor credit, and therefore he would to the court and understand Her Majesty's further pleasure to which I would not be against, but must desire you as I know Her Majesty will also make him know that it was of good grace to appoint that place to him having no more experience than he hath, and then to use the matter as you shall think good. For my own part ... I am glad to be rid of my Lord of Oxford seeing he refuseth this, & I pray you let me not be pressed any more for him, what suit soever he make.[155]
By 20 December 1588 Oxford had secretly sold his London mansion of Fisher's Folly to Sir William Cornwallis (c.1551-1611).[156]
In 1588 Anthony Munday dedicated to Oxford the two parts of his Palmerin d'Oliva.[157]
On 14 April 1589 Oxford was among the peers who found Philip Howard, Earl of Arundel, the eldest son and heir of Oxford's cousin, Thomas, Duke of Norfolk, guilty of treason.[158]
In that year The Arte of English Poesie, usually attributed to George Puttenham, placed Oxford among a 'crew' of courtier poets:
And in her Maiesties time that now is are sprong vp an other crew of Courtly makers Noble men and Gentlemen of her Maiesties owne seruauntes, who haue written excellently well as it would appeare if their doings could be found out and made publicke with the rest, of which number is first that noble Gentleman Edward Earle of Oxford, Thomas Lord of Bukhurst, when he was young, Henry Lord Paget, Sir Philip Sydney, Sir Walter Rawleigh, Master Edward Dyar, Maister Fulke Greuille, Gascon, Britton, Turberuille, and a great many other learned Gentlemen.[159]
Puttenham also considered Oxford among the best comic playwrights of the day:
Of the later sort I thinke thus. That for Tragedie, the Lord of Buckhurst, & Maister Edward Ferrys for such doings as I haue sene of theirs do deserue the hyest price: Th'Earle of Oxford and Maister Edwardes of her Maiesties Chappell for Comedy and interlude.[160]
In 1590 Edmund Spenser appended a sonnet to Oxford in his The Faerie Queen, referring to 'the love which thou dost bear/ to th' Heliconian imps and they to thee', likely in reference to Oxford's literary protegees Lyly, Munday, Greene and Watson, 'and now, at least prospectively, Spenser himself'.[161]
On 6 January 1591 Thomas Churchyard wrote to Juliana Penne concerning rent owing for rooms he had taken in her house on behalf of Oxford.[162]
On 18 May 1591 Oxford, clearly weary of the unsettled life of a courtier, wrote to Lord Burghley outlining a plan to purchase the demesnes of Denbigh in Wales if the Queen would consent, offering to pay for the lands by commuting his £1000 annuity and relinquishing his claim to the Forest of Essex:
Whereas I have heard her Majesty meant to sell unto one Middleton, a merchant, and one Carmarden the demesnes of Denbigh which, as I am informed, is £230 by yearly rent now as it is, I would be an humble suitor to her Majesty that I might have had this bargain, paying the £8000 as they should have done, accepting for £5000 thereof the pension which she hath given me in the Exchequer, and the other £3000 the next term, or upon such reasonable days as her Majesty would grant me by her favour. And, further, if her Majesty would not accept the pension for £5000, that then she would yet take unto it, to make it up that value, the title of the forest which, by all counsel of law, and conscience, is as good right unto me as any other land in England. And I think her Majesty makes no evil bargain, and I would be glad to be sure of something that were mine own and that I might possess.[163]
Oxford concludes: 'So shall my children be provided for, myself at length settled in quiet and, I hope, your Lordship contented, remaining no cause for you to think me an evil father, nor any doubt in me but that I may enjoy that friendship from your Lordship that so near a match, and not fruitless, may lawfully expect'.[164]
In the spring of 1591 the plan by which the purchasers of Oxford's lands were repaying his debt to the Court of Wards was disrupted by extents by the Queen against some of the lands.[48][165] In the same letter of 18 May 1591 Oxford complained that his servant Thomas Hampton had fraudulently taken advantage of these extents by taking money from the tenants of the lands to his own use, and had also fraudulently colluded with another of Oxford's servants, Israel Amyce, to pass a document under the Great Seal of England to Oxford's detriment.[166] Although the details are unclear, Thomas Skinner was also involved in the fraud occasioned by the Queen's extents against Oxford's lands.[165] On 30 June 1591 Oxford wrote to Lord Burghley reminding him that he had agreed with the Queen to forebear his claim regarding the Forest of Essex for three reasons, including the Queen's reluctance to punish Skinner's felony:
First in consideration of her promise, then for the forbearing of Skinner's felony, which was proved by witnesses examined, confessed by his fellow Catcher, and yet resting in the hands of her Majesty's Attorney. Last of all to disburden me of the £20,000 bonds and statute which the same Skinner had caused me to forfeit by procuring of his own land to be extended for the £400 which he did agree with the rest of the purchasers to pay for his portion into the Court of Wards, minding to benefit himself by the same.[167]
In 1591 the composer John Farmer, who was in Oxford's service at the time, dedicated to him The First Set of Divers & Sundry Ways of Two Parts in One, noting in the dedication Oxford's love of music ('I was the rather emboldened for your Lordship's great affection to this noble science').[168]
Remarriage and suits to the Queen
On 4 July 1591 Oxford sold the Great Garden property at Aldgate to John Wolley and his future brother-in-law, Francis Trentham.[169][170] The arrangement was stated to be for the benefit of Elizabeth Trentham, then one of the Queen's Maids of Honour, whom Oxford married later that year. An entry records a gift from the Queen to 'the Countess of Oxford at her marriage the 27 of December Anno 34'.[171]
In July of that year Oxford applied to the Queen for a licence to import oils, fruits and wools, citing the promise the Queen had given him when he had abandoned his suit for the Forest of Essex at her command.[172]
In 1592 Oxford disposed of the last of his large estates. On 7 February 1592 he sold Colne Priory to Roger Harlakenden, who purchased in the name of his son, Richard.[173] The sale resulted in lawsuits by Oxford for fraud against Roger Harlakenden which dragged on into the next generation.[174][175] In late 1592 he sold Castle Hedingham, the seat of his earldom, to Lord Burghley in trust for his three daughters by his first marriage, Elizabeth, Bridget and Susan.[176]
On 24 February 1593 Oxford's only surviving son and heir, Henry de Vere, was born at Stoke Newington, where 'the Earl of Oxford is sometime resident in a very proper house'.[177]
On 25 October 1593 Oxford wrote to Lord Burghley concerning his suit for a licence to import oils, fruits and wools, again citing the Queen's promise made to him when she had commanded him to abandon his claim to the Forest of Essex:
My very good Lord, I hope it is not out of your remembrance how long sithence I have been a suitor to her Majesty that she would give me leave to try my title to the forest at the law, but I found that so displeasing unto her that, in place of receiving that ordinary favour which is of course granted to the meanest subject, I was browbeaten and had many bitter speeches given me.[178]
Oxford reminds Lord Burghley that the Queen had committed the matter to Sir Christopher Hatton for arbitration,[179] but when Hatton was ready to deliver his report, the Queen:
flatly refused therein to hear my Lord Chancellor, and for a final answer commanded me no more to follow the suit for, whether it was hers or mine, she was resolved to dispose thereof at her pleasure.[180]
On 7 July 1594 Oxford wrote to Lord Burghley concerning abuses in his office of Lord Great Chamberlain which had prejudiced both himself and the Queen.[181]
On 25 September 1594, King Henri IV of France wrote to Oxford, thanking him for 'the good offices you have performed on my behalf in [the Queen's] presence'.[182]
In the mid-1590s Anthony Munday dedicated to Oxford his Primaleon; The First Book. The dedication is lost; however in the dedication of the second edition in 1619 to Oxford's heir, Munday recalls that 'these three several parts of Primaleon of Greece were the tribute of my duty and service' to 'that most noble Earl, your father'.[183]
On 26 January 1595 Oxford's daughter Elizabeth married William Stanley, 6th Earl of Derby.[184] A few months later, on 24 April, Oxford wrote to his brother-in-law, Sir Robert Cecil, stating that he had 'dealt with the Earl of Derby about my daughter's allowance' and that Derby had promised to assure his new bride £1000 a year, but was now about to leave for Lancashire without having made any financial provision for her.[185]
From March to August of 1595 Oxford actively pursued a suit, in competition with Lord Buckhurst, to farm the tin mines in Cornwall.[186] On 20 March 1595 he wrote to Lord Burghley, summing up past years of fruitless attempts to amend his financial situation:
[I] heartily desire your lordship to have a feeling of mine infortunate estate, which although it be far unfit to endure delays, yet have consumed four or five years in a flattering hope of idle words. But now, having received this comfortable message of furtherance & favour from your Lordship, although her Majesty be forgetful of herself, yet by such a good mean I do not doubt if you list but that I may receive some fruit of all my travail. This last year past I have been a suitor to her Majesty that I might farm her tins, giving £3000 a year more than she had made.[187]
Oxford's letters and memoranda indicate that he pursued his suit into early 1596 and renewed it again in 1599,but was ultimately unsuccessful in obtaining the tin monopoly.[188]
On 20 October 1595 Oxford wrote to Sir Robert Cecil mentioning friction between himself and the Earl of Essex, partly over the Forest of Essex:
[Lord Burghley] wisheth me to make means to the Earl of Essex that he would forbear to deal for it [i.e. the Forest of Essex], a thing I cannot do in honour sith I have already received divers injuries and wrongs from him which bar me of all such base courses.[189]
The next day Oxford wrote again to his brother-in-law on the subject of his claim to the Forest, terming him 'the only person that I dare rely upon in the court'. Unlike Lord Burghley, however, Sir Robert Cecil seems to have done little to further Oxford's interests.[190]
On 28 March Oxford advised Michael Hicks that he was unable to go to court because he had not yet fully recovered from an illness. On 4 June he wrote to Lord Burghley that 'I have been this day let blood',[191] and on 7 August he wrote to Burghley from Byfleet, where he gone for his health:
I most heartily thank your Lordship for your desire to know of my health, which is not so good yet as I wish it. I find comfort in this air, but no fortune in the court.[192]
On 9 November Rowland Whyte wrote to Sir Robert Sidney that 'Some say my Lord of Oxford is dead'.[193] Whether the rumour of Oxford's death was related to the illness mentioned in his letters earlier in the year is unknown.
On 11 January 1597 Oxford wrote to Sir Robert Cecil concerning a petition to the Privy Council by Thomas Gurlyn against Oxford's wife, Elizabeth. The background to Gurlyn's petition is obscure, but appears to relate to events which transpired shortly after Oxford's arrival in the Low Countries on 27 August 1585. Gurlyn's claim was dismissed at trial.[194]
In 1597 Oxford's servant, Henry Lok, published his Ecclesiastes containing a sonnet to Oxford.[195]
On 2 September 1597 the executors of Sir Rowland Hayward were authorized to sell King's Place in Hackney to Oxford's wife, Elizabeth, and three of her kinsmen.[196]
On 8 September Oxford again spoke of ill health, writing to Lord Burghley that 'I am sorry that I have not an able body which might have served to attend her Majesty in the place where she is, being especially there, whither without any other occasion than to see your Lordship I would always willingly go'.[197] On 14 December 1597 Oxford attended his last Parliament, perhaps another indication of failing health.[198]
Oxford's father-in-law, Lord Burghley, died on 4 August 1598 at the age of 78, leaving substantial bequests to Oxford's two unmarried daughters, Bridget and Susan.[199] Any hope Oxford might have had of assuming parental care of his daughters was dashed by Sir Robert Cecil, who wrote to Michael Hicks that 'whether he that never gave them groat, hath a second wife and another child be a fit guardian, consider you'.[200]
In his Palladis Tamia, published in 1598, Francis Meres adjudged Oxford as one of 'the best for Comedy amongst vs'.[201]
On 28 April 1599 Oxford was sued by Judith Ruswell, widow of William Ruswell, for an alleged debt of £500 for services rendered by Ruswell as a tailor 18 or 20 years earlier. Oxford defended the suit, alleging that not only had he paid Ruswell, but that Ruswell had subsequently absconded with 'cloth of gold and silver and other stuff' belonging to Oxford worth £800. The outcome of the suit is unknown.[202]
Earlier negotiations for a marriage to William Herbert having fallen through, in May or June 1599 Oxford's 15-year-old daughter Bridget married Francis Norris.[203]
In 1599 John Farmer dedicated a second book to Oxford, The First Set of English Madrigals, alluding in the dedication to Oxford's own proficiency as a musician ('without flattery be it spoken, those that know your Lordship know this, that using this science as a recreation, your Lordship have overgone most of them that make it a profession'.[204] In the same year, George Baker dedicated a second book to Oxford, his Practice of the New and Old Physic, a translation of a work by Conrad Gesner, stating that he had published it under Oxford's 'honourable protection . . . because your wit, learning and authority hath great force and strength in repressing the curious crakes of the envious'.[205]
Two entries in the Stationers' Register attest to the continued existence of Oxford's Men in the early 1600s. The Weakest Goeth to the Wall was registered on 23 October 1600 as having been 'sundry times played by the right honourable the Earl of Oxenford, Lord Great Chamberlain of England, his servants', while The True History of George Scanderbeg was registered on 3 July 1601 'as it was lately played by the right honourable the Earl of Oxenford his servants'.[206]
In July 1600 Oxford wrote requesting Sir Robert Cecil's help in securing an appointment as Governor of the Isle of Jersey, once again citing the Queen's unfulfilled promises to him:
Although my bad success in former suits to her Majesty have given me cause to bury my hopes in the deep abyss and bottom of despair rather than now to attempt, after so many trials made in vain & so many opportunities escaped, the effects of fair words or fruits of golden promises, yet for that I cannot believe but that there hath been always a true correspondency of word and intention in her Majesty, I do conjecture that with a little help that which of itself hath brought forth so fair blossoms will also yield fruit. Wherefore having moved her Majesty lately about the office of the Isle . . . .[207]
On 2 February 1601 Oxford again wrote to Cecil for his support, this time for the office of President of Wales.[208] As with his former suits, Oxford was again unsuccessful. About this time he was also listed on the Pipe Rolls as owing £20 for the subsidy.[209]
After the abortive Essex rebellion on 8 February 1601, Oxford was 'the senior of the twenty-five noblemen' who rendered verdicts at the treason trials of Essex and Southampton.[210] After Essex's co-conspirator Sir Charles Danvers was executed on 18 March 1601, Oxford became involved in a complicated suit concerning the Queen's right to lands which had escheated to the Crown at Danvers' attainder, a suit opposed by Danvers' kinsmen.[211] On 7 August Lord Buckhurst and Sir John Fortescue wrote to the Attorney-General, Sir Edward Coke, that 'my Lord of Oxford doth desire that he may have a copy of the case as you have collected it out of the evidences showed before us to the intent he may consider thereof with his learned counsel for the benefit of her Majesty, as he affirmeth, the which we think fit he have'.[212]
While pursuing the Danvers suit, Oxford continued to suffer from ill health. On 7 October he wrote to Cecil saying that 'if my health had been to my mind, I would have been before this at the court'. On 22 November he wrote again, saying that 'In that I have not sent an answer to your last letter as you might expect, I shall desire you to hold me for excused sith ever sithence the receipt thereof by reason of my sickness I have not been able to write', and asking that Cecil 'bear with the weakness of my lame hand'.[213]
On 4 December Oxford wrote again to Cecil, expressing shock that Cecil, who had encouraged him to undertake the Danvers suit, had now withdrawn his support:
I cannot conceive in so short a time & in so small an absence how so great a change is happened in you, for in the beginning of my suit to her Majesty I was doubtful to enter thereinto both for the want I had of friends and the doubt of the Careys, but I was encouraged by you, who did not only assure me to be an assured friend unto me, but further did undertake to move it to her, which you so well performed that that after some dispute her Majesty was contented. In that good beginning I was promised favour, that I should have assistance of her Majesty's counsel in law, that I should have expedition, but for favour the other party hitherto hath found much more, and as for assistance of her Majesty's counsel, who hath been more, nay only against me, the expedition hath been such that what might have been done in one month is now almost a year deferred.[214]
As with his other suits aimed at improving his financial situation, this last of Oxford's suits to the Queen ended in disappointment. On 22 March 1602 he wrote to Cecil: 'It is now a year sithence by your only means her Majesty granted her interest in Danvers' escheat. I had only then her word from your mouth. I find by this waste of time that lands will not be carried without deeds.'[215]
Oxford's only successful suit to the Queen during these years involved his playing company. On 31 March 1602 the Privy Council sent a letter to the Lord Mayor of London, Sir John Garrard:
We received your letter signifying some amendment of the abuses or disorders by the immoderate exercise of stage plays in and about the city by means of our late order renewed for the restraint of them, and withal showing a special inconvenience yet remaining by reason that the servants of our very good Lord the Earl of Oxford, and of me, the Earl of Worcester, being joined by agreement together in one company, to whom, upon notice of her Majesty's pleasure at the suit of the Earl of Oxford, toleration hath been thought meet to be granted, notwithstanding the restraint of our said former orders, do not tie themselves to one certain place and house, but do change their place at their own disposition, which is as disorderly and offensive as the former offence of many houses, and as the other companies that are allowed, namely of me, the Lord Admiral, and the Lord Chamberlain, be appointed their certain houses, and one and no more to each company, so we do straitly require that this third company be likewise appointed to one place. And because we are informed the house called the Boar's Head is the place they have especially used and do best like of, we do pray and require you that that said house, namely the Boar's Head, may be assigned unto them, and that they be very straitly charged to use and exercise their plays in no other but that house, as they will look to have that toleration continued and avoid farther displeasure.[216][217]
Last years
In the early morning of 24 March 1603 Queen Elizabeth died without naming a successor.[218] A few days before the Queen's death Oxford entertained the Earl of Lincoln, a nobleman known for his erratic and violent behaviour, at his house at Hackney, and after dinner:
discourse[d] with him of the impossibility of the Queen's life, and that the nobility, being peers of the realm, were bound to take care for the common good of the state in the cause of succession, in the which himself, meaning the Earl of Lincoln, ought to have more regard than others because he had a nephew of the blood royal, naming my Lord Hastings, whom he persuaded the Earl of Lincoln to send for, and that there should be means used to convey him over into France where he should find friends that would make him a party, of the which there was a precedent in former times.[219]
Lincoln relayed his conversation with Oxford to Sir John Peyton, Lieutenant of the Tower, who later defended his refusal to take Lincoln's report as a serious threat to King James' accession:
- At the first apprehension of my Lord of Lincoln's discovery I was much moved and troubled, but when he had made me understand what great person it was whom he meant, I knew him to be so weak in body, in friends, in ability and all other means to raise any combustion in the state as I never feared anything to proceed from so feeble a foundation.[220]
In light of his discussion with Oxford, Lincoln was astonished to find Oxford's name among the signatories to the proclamation of James of Scotland as King immediately after the Queen's death.[221]
On 25 and 27 April 1603 Oxford wrote to Cecil:
I have always found myself beholding to you for many kindnesses and courtesies, wherefore I am bold at this present, which giveth occasion of many considerations, to desire you as my very good friend and kind brother-in-law to impart to me what course is devised by you of the Council & the rest of the Lords concerning our duties to the King's Majesty, whether you do expect any messenger before his coming to let us understand his pleasure, or else his personal arrival to be presently or very shortly. And, if it be so, what order is resolved on amongst you, either for the attending or meeting of his Majesty for, by reason of mine infirmity, I cannot come among you so often as I wish, and by reason my house is not so near that at every occasion I can be present, as were fit.[222]
In the same letter Oxford expressed his grief at the late Queen's death, and his fears for the future:
I cannot but find a great grief in myself to remember the mistress which we have lost, under whom both you and myself from our greenest years have been in a manner brought up, and although it hath pleased God after an earthly kingdom to take her up into a more permanent and heavenly state wherein I do not doubt but she is crowned with glory, and to give us a prince wise, learned and enriched with all virtues, yet the long time which we spent in her service we cannot look for so much left of our days as to bestow upon another, neither the long acquaintance and kind familiarities wherewith she did use us we are not ever to expect from another prince, as denied by the infirmity of age and common course of reason. In this common shipwreck, mine is above all the rest who, least regarded though often comforted of all her followers, she hath left to try my fortune among the alterations of time and chance, either without sail whereby to take the advantage of any prosperous gale or with anchor to ride till the storm be overpassed. There is nothing therefore left to my comfort but the excellent virtues and deep wisdom wherewith God hath endued our new master and sovereign Lord, who doth not come amongst us as a stranger but as a natural prince, succeeding by right of blood and inheritance, not as a conqueror but as the true shepherd of Christ's flock to cherish and comfort them.[223]
Oxford fears were ill-founded, however. In letters to Cecil in May and June 1603 he again pressed his decades-long claim to be restored to the keepership of Waltham Forest and the house and park of Havering, and on 18 July 1603 the new King granted his suit.[224] On 2 August 1603 the King confirmed Oxford's annuity of £1000.[225]
On 18 June 1604 Oxford granted the custody of the Forest of Essex to his son-in-law, Lord Norris, and his cousin, Sir Francis Vere.[226] Six days later Oxford died on 24 June 1604 of unknown causes at King's Place, Hackney, without leaving a will,[227] and was buried on 6 July in the parish church of St. Augustine.[228] In her will, his widow, Elizabeth, requested that she too be buried 'in the church of Hackney . . . as near unto the body of my late dear and noble Lord and husband as may be; only I will that there be in the said church erected for us a tomb fitting our degree'.[229] Although the Countess's will and parish registers confirm Oxford's burial at Hackney, his cousin Percival Golding later stated that his body lies at Westminster:
I will speak only what all men's voices confirm: he was a man in mind and body absolutely accomplished with honourable endowments. He died at his house at Hackney in the month of June anno 1604, and lieth buried at Westminster.[230]
Heirs and inheritance
By his first marriage to Anne Cecil Oxford had at least two sons and a daughter who died young, and three daughters who survived infancy. The Earl's daughters all married into the peerage. Elizabeth married William Stanley, 6th Earl of Derby. Bridget married Francis Norris, 1st Earl of Berkshire. Susan married Philip Herbert, 4th Earl of Pembroke and Montgomery.
By his mistress Anne Vavasour Oxford had an illegitimate son, Sir Edward Vere.[231]
By his second wife, Elizabeth Trentham, Oxford had his only surviving legitimate son and heir, Henry de Vere, later 18th Earl of Oxford.
As noted earlier, 12 years before his death Oxford had sold his interest in Castle Hedingham to Lord Burghley in trust for his three daughters by his first marriage. After the death of Oxford's widow, Elizabeth, their son, Henry, inherited the remainder of Oxford's estate. Two inquisitions post mortem were taken after Oxford's death, the first in 1604 for his property in Essex, the second in 1608 for his Great Garden property in London.[232] Magdalene College brought suit against Oxford’s heir for the Great Garden property, and legal proceedings continued for decades.[233][234] The value of the property to both Magdalene College and Oxford's heir is indicated by a 1615 case in Chancery stating that in 1575:[235][236][237]
[T]he Queen at the suit of the said College licensed them to alien . . . .The same was accordingly performed by a conveyance to her Majesty, and from her Majesty to Spinola, and the rectory from Spinola to the College, after which Spinola and the Earl of Oxford, his assignee and his under-tenants have built upon the garden 130 houses, and therein bestowed £10,000, which assignee and his under-tenants have bonds and security given for the enjoyment thereof to the sum of £20,000.
Reputation
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Paradise_of_Dainty_Devices.jpg/170px-Paradise_of_Dainty_Devices.jpg)
A stream of dedications attests to Oxford's intellectual reputation and his lifelong patronage of writers, musicians and actors. Stephen May terms Oxford 'a nobleman with extraordinary intellectual interests and commitments', whose biography exhibits a 'lifelong devotion to learning'.[238] Concerning Oxford's patronage, he writes:
The range of Oxford's patronage is as remarkable as it substance. . . . Among the thirty-three works dedicated to the Earl, six deal with religion and philosophy, two with music, and three with medicine; but the focus of his patronage was literary, for thirteen of the books presented to him were original and translated works of literature. Thus forty percent of the books offered to the Earl were literary, and even if we subtract all seven dedications by the prolific Munday, this category would still account of almost one fourth of the total. By contrast, peers of similar means and with some reputation for cultivating the arts were rather less sought after by Elizabethan men of letters.[239]
As noted above, Oxford maintained companies of boy actors and men players in the years from 1580 to 1602, held the lease of the Blackfriars Theatre for a time, and patronized a company of musicians.
Oxford also had a high reputation as a poet amongst his contemporaries, and his verses were published in several poetry miscellanies. Both Webbe and Puttenham praised his poetic ability, and the latter quoted his verses:[240]
|
Shakespeare authorship question
In Shakespeare Identified, published in 1920, J. Thomas Looney, an English schoolteacher, proposed Oxford as a candidate for the authorship of Shakespeare's works. His theory, based on perceived analogies between Oxford's life and poetic techniques and Shakespeare's plays and sonnets, gradually replaced Francis Bacon's ascendancy in the field. However most Shakespeare specialists reject all alternative candidates for authorship.
Footnotes
- ^ May 2007, p. 61
- ^ May 2007, p. 66
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 236–239, 380–384
- ^ Ward 1928, pp. 274–275
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 386–387
- ^ May 2007, p. 61
- ^ a b c d Cokayne 1945, p. 250
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 23
- ^ Ward 1928, p. 7
- ^ Ward 1928, p. 9
- ^ Loades 1989, pp. 181, 184
- ^ Ward 1928, pp. 9–10
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 239
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 447
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 25
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 115, 145
- ^ Pearson 2005, pp. 14, 222
- ^ Pearson 2005, p. 14
- ^ Ward 1928, p. 20
- ^ Ward 1928, p. 21
- ^ Ward 1928, pp. 20–21
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 40–41
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 41
- ^ G.E.C. 1945, pp. 249–250
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 43
- ^ Ward 1928, pp. 23–24
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 42–45
- ^ Ward 1928, p. 27
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 47
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 48
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 49
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 50
- ^ Ward 1928, pp. 31–3
- ^ Ward 1928, pp. 30–31
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 50–53
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 49–50
- ^ Ward 1928, pp. 49–50
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 236
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 69–70
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 70
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 71
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 72
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 74–75
- ^ Nelson 2005, pp. 101, 106–107, 141
- ^ Hurstfield 1958, pp. 169–176
- ^ PRO 1966, p. 450
- ^ a b Nelson 2003, p. 294
- ^ a b c Pearson 2005, p. 35
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 73
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 236
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 237
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 237
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 53–4, 80–82, 84
- ^ May 1980, p. 67
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 95
- ^ Nicolas 1847, pp. 28–9
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 99–104
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 237; Ungerer 2004
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 109
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 108–116
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 119
- ^ Pearson 2006, p. 44
- ^ Pearson 2006, pp. 43–44
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 120
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 121
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 125, 164, 176
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 128, 130
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 132
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 134
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 135–137
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 117
- ^ a b Nelson 2003, pp. 123, 129
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 142
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 145–146
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 141–154
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 154
- ^ May 1980, pp. 68–73
- ^ May 1991, p. 53
- ^ May 2007, p. 66
- ^ May 1991, p. 53
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 172–173, 176, 179
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 169
- ^ Kennedy 2004, p. 169
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 171
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 186–188
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 177
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 178
- ^ Pearson 2006, p. 229
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 180
- ^ a b Nelson 2003, p. 181
- ^ a b Nelson 2003, p. 190
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 195–200
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 200–201, 203
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 237–8
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 228
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 225–226
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 225–228
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 230
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 240
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 242
- ^ a b Nelson 2003, p. 247
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 244–245
- ^ Pearson 2005, pp. 46–51
- ^ Jones 2008
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 230–231
- ^ Bennell 2004
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 238, 247
- ^ Bergeron 2007 harvnb error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFBergeron2007 (help)
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 238
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 249
- ^ a b Nelson 2003, p. 250
- ^ a b Nelson 2003, p. 252
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 253–254
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 254–259
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 259
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 260, 268, 274, 275
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 261–5
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 266
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 269
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 380
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 270–272, 277–278
- ^ Ward 1928, pp. 278–280
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 280
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 357
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 281–282
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 281–282
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 283
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 284–285
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 289–290
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 285–286, 290–291
- ^ May 1991, p. 269
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 293
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 381
- ^ Pearson 2005, p. 52
- ^ Pearson 2005, pp. 35, 192
- ^ a b c Nelson 2003, p. 248
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 245–6
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 246–7
- ^ Smith 1964, p. 467
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 295–296
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 296
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 296–297
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 297
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 301
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 302
- ^ Beebee 1999, p. 32
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 381
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 386–387
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 303–306
- ^ a b Nelson 2003, p. 306
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 309–310
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 311–312
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 314–316
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 316
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 317–318
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 319–320
- ^ Bergeron 2007 harvnb error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFBergeron2007 (help)
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 321
- ^ Puttenham 1936, p. 61
- ^ Puttenham 1936, p. 63
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 383
- ^ Smith 1977, pp. 87–88; Nelson 2003, pp. 328–329
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 331–332
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 332
- ^ a b Nelson 2003, p. 334
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 330
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 332–3
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 381
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 335
- ^ Pearson 2005, p. 49
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 336–337
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 337–338
- ^ Pearson 2005, pp. 192–193
- ^ Pearson 2005, pp. 192–196
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 346–348
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 335, 367
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 343
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 343–344
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 343–344, 351–352
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 343
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 348
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 349
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 382
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 349–350
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 350–351
- ^ Pearson 2005, pp. 56–57
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 355
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 356–358
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 352
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 352–353
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 357
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 353, 357
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 354
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 361–367
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 383
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 368
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 369
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 369
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 370-373
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 373
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 386–387
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 376–379
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 369, 374–376
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 381–382
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 382
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 391
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 394
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 396–398
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 396
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 397
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 398–402, 407
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 399
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 400–401
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 401
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 401
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 391–392
- ^ Chambers 2009, p. 225
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 408
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 414
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 415
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 415
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 418–419
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 419
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 420–421, 423
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 423
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 423
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 431
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 423–424
- ^ Ward 1928, p. 347.
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 431.
- ^ Nelson 2003, p. 266
- ^ Nelson 2003, pp. 431, 486
- ^ Purnell 1904, pp. 67–72
- ^ Pearson 2003, p. 49
- ^ Purnell 1904, pp. 67–72
- ^ Pearson 2005, pp. 48–49
- ^ English Reports, pp. 485–489
- ^ May 1980, p. 8
- ^ May 1980, p. 9
- ^ Puttenham 1936, p. 206
References
- Beebee, Thomas O. (1999), Epistolary fiction in Europe, 1500–1850, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-62275-2
- Bennell, John (2004), "Hester, John (d. 1592),", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press
- Bergeron, David M. (2007), "Stocker, Thomas (fl. 1563–1593)", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press
- Bergeron, David M. (2007), "Munday, Anthony (bap. 1560, d. 1633)", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press
- Bossy, John (1959), "English Catholics and the French Marriage, 1577-1581", Recusant History, vol. 5, pp. 2–16
- Chambers, E. K. (2009) [1923], The Elizabethan Stage, Volume 2, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-199-56749-2
- Cokayne, George Edward (G.E.C.) (1945), The Complete Peerage, vol. X, St Catherine Press, pp. 247–254
- Greaves, Richard L. (2007), "Munday, Anthony (bap. 1560, d. 1633)", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press
- Hurstfield, Joel (1958), The Queen's Wards, Longmans, Green, pp. 249–256
- Jones, N.G. (2008), "Kelke, Roger (1523/4–1576)", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press
- Kennedy, Kathleen E. (2008), "Brooke, John (d.1582)", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press
- Loades, David (1989), Mary Tudor: A Life, Basil Blackwell, pp. 181–184
- May, Steven W. (1980), "The Poems of Edward DeVere, Seventeenth Earl of Oxford and of Robert Devereux, Second Earl of Essex", Studies in Philology, vol. 77, no. 5, University of North Carolina Press
{{citation}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - May, Steven W. (1991), The Elizabethan courtier poets: the poems and their contexts, University of Missouri Press, ISBN 978-0-826-20749-4
- May, Steven W. (2004), "The Seventeenth Earl of Oxford as poet and playwright", Tennessee Law Review, 72, Tennessee Law Review Association: 221–254
- May, Steven W. (2007), "Earlier Courtier Verse: Oxford, Dyer, and Gascoigne", in Cheney, Patrick; et al. (eds.), Early Modern English Poetry: A Critical Companion, Oxford University Press, pp. 60–69
{{citation}}
: Explicit use of et al. in:|editor2-last=
(help) - Nelson, Alan H. (2003), Monstrous Adversary: the life of Edward de Vere,17th Earl of Oxford, Liverpool University Press, ISBN 978-0-85323-678-8
- Nelson, Alan H. (2004), "Edward deVere", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, accessed 13 Oct 2010.
- Nicolas, Harris H. (1847), Memoirs of the Life and Times of Sir Christopher Hatton, Richard Bentley, pp. 28–29
- Pearson, Daphne (2005), Edward de Vere (1550–1604): The Crisis and Consequences of Wardship, Ashgate Publishing Ltd., ISBN 978-0-75465-088-1
- Peck, Dwight (1978), "Raleigh, Sidney, Oxford, and the Catholics, 1579", Notes and Queries(new Series), 23 (nos.5–6): 427–431
{{citation}}
:|issue=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - PRO (1966) [1939], Calendar of the patent rolls preserved in the Public Record Office: Elizabeth [I]. Vol. 5, 1569-72., HMSO
- Purnell, Edward Kelly (1904), Magdalene College, F.E. Robinson, pp. 67–72
- Puttenham, George (1936, reprinted 1970), Willcock, Doidge Willcock; Walker, Alice (eds.), The Arte of English Poesie, Cambridge University Press
{{citation}}
: Check date values in:|year=
(help)CS1 maint: year (link) - Schoenbaum, S. (1991), Shakespeare’s Lives, 2nd ed., Clarendon, ISBN 978-0-198-18618-2
- Shapiro, Michael (2009), "Early (Pre-1590) Boy Companies and their Acting Venues", in Dutton, Richard (ed.), The Oxford handbook of early modern theatre, Oxford University Press, pp. 120–135, ISBN 978-0-199-28724-6
- Smith, Alan G.R. (1977), Servant of the Cecils; The Life of Sir Michael Hickes, 1543-1612, Jonathan Cape, pp. 87–88
- Smith, Irwin M. (1964), Shakespeare's Blackfriars Playhouse; Its History and Its Design, New York University Press
- Somerset, Alan (2009), "Not Just Sir Oliver Owlet: From Patrons to 'Patronage' of Early Modern Theatre", in Dutton, Richard (ed.), The Oxford handbook of early modern theatre, Oxford University Press, pp. 343–62, ISBN 978-0-199-28724-6
- Ungerer, Gustav (2004), "Baker, George (1540–1612)", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press
- Ward, Bernard M. (1928), The Seventeenth Earl of Oxford, 1550–1604: From Contemporary Documents, John Murray
External links
- De Vere's Patronage of Theater: Patrons and Performances Web Site
- Index entry for Edward de Vere at Poets' Corner
- Use dmy dates from October 2010
- English poets
- People of the Tudor period
- Lord Great Chamberlains
- Earls in the Peerage of England
- Alumni of Queens' College, Cambridge
- Oxfordian theory of Shakespearean authorship
- English dramatists and playwrights
- English writers
- 1550 births
- 1604 deaths
- Prisoners in the Tower of London