User talk:DragoLink08

Welcome!

Hello, DragoLink08, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 21:05, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Template:Georgia Tech Navbox

I reverted your edit. The color change makes the text hard to read. Ndenison ^talk 03:49, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Template:Rutgers

Hello DragoLink08. I have reverted your edit. The black background makes the text hard to read, and is not visually pleasing either.
- Idunno271828 (Talk | contribs) 06:32, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Italy national football team

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Italy national football team, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Matthew_hk tc 05:41, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Templates

I suggest you stop with the template editing for a while and join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Question about "Football in..." templates. Rettetast (talk) 16:10, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Template:GermanyNationalTeams

Its customry on wikipedia to provide an edit summary when making edits. I'm not sure why you are removing the color on the template but I've reverted your edit. To have a color in the top name section of the template is a common thing to virtually all sports templates and if you don't like it I suggest you initiate a discussion and suggest there that they should be removed rather then just removing it without explanation. EA210269 (talk) 03:05, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Rugby colour changes

please seek consensus at {{WP:RU]] before making colour changes. This has already been debated and current consensus is against it. noq (talk) 00:23, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Michigan Wolverines, Notre Dame Fighting Irish football, Hawaii Warriors football colors

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Your repeated attempts to change the color scheme for these articles constitute vandalism. In each article, editors more familiar with these teams than you are have established the correct and traditional color patterns. Sensei48 (talk) 05:09, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Add San Jose State. This editor clearly has no knowledge of the traditions of U.S, university football and persists in vandalizing team pages. A ban should be forthcoming shortly. Sensei48 (talk) 07:01, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

I reverted your color change. It was unaccompanied by any edit summary, and since you only changed one infobox of the several on the page, they no longer matched. From the commentary you're accumulating here I suggest you proceed with a little more caution and care in making these changes! JohnInDC (talk) 01:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Pegasus

Consensus was not to use the original Japanese names but the English manga names. Though those two things are usually consistent, in Pegasus's case they are not. Therefore, his article should be at Maximillion Pegasus, as it was used in the English manga. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 20:25, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Template:OregonBasketballCoach

I reverted your edits. That color scheme with gold as the primary color is (a) incorrect, as green is the school's primary color, and (b) god awful on the eyes to read. Jrcla2 (talk) 03:59, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Colors

You have obviously been warned several times about your inappropriate color changes. I'm going to ask you again to desist. Persisting in light of all these warnings could be considered disruptive and might lead to a block. — KV5 • Talk • 23:32, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. — KV5 • Talk • 23:31, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:University of Memphis

Thank you so much for the additions to the University of Memphis template. 140.228.26.18 (talk) 04:37, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

For the last time, navbox colors

I reverted your edits [1][2] to {{Cincinnati Bearcats basketball coach navbox}} because the colors you've changed them to are hard on the eyes and they create inconsistency with {{Cincinnati Bearcats football coach navbox}}.

This is the second time I've left you a message regarding your navbox color scheme-changing edits, and I'm not the only one to do so, either. I don't think all of your edits are wrong, for the record. But when the only edits you ever make are regarding navbox colors, and you never once bring up the changes for consensus, then it becomes disruptive editing. Your refusal to ever acknowledge anyone who writes on your talk page only hurts the appearance of it all, because we know you get these messages. Not responding in any way is making this out to be a sure sign of you not wanting to hear it. Jrcla2 (talk) 19:20, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — KV5 • Talk • 19:35, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — KV5 • Talk • 11:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

If you are able to actively participate in discussion about your edits, you may use your user talk page to do so until your block expires. I sincerely hope that this short block will clarify things for you and ensure that you discuss your edits in the future, especially when requested to do so. If you come back and continue to proceed as before your block, the level of block can escalate, and that's not something we want to see. Take a day or two off and come back with a productive attitude. Thanks. — KV5 • Talk • 11:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)