Jump to content

User talk:Ecoles91: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
reply
m Reverted edits by FisherQueen (talk) to last version by Forgottenbooks
Line 50: Line 50:
If you believe this block was made in error, please see how to [[WP:AAB|appeal a block]]. </div>[[Category:Wikipedians who are indefinitely blocked for promotional user names|{{PAGENAME}}]]{{z17}}<!-- Template:Uw-spamublock -->--[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]] &#x007C; [[User talk:Orangemike|<font color="orange">Talk</font>]] 22:31, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
If you believe this block was made in error, please see how to [[WP:AAB|appeal a block]]. </div>[[Category:Wikipedians who are indefinitely blocked for promotional user names|{{PAGENAME}}]]{{z17}}<!-- Template:Uw-spamublock -->--[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]] &#x007C; [[User talk:Orangemike|<font color="orange">Talk</font>]] 22:31, 27 May 2011 (UTC)


{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=lizziecoles91 | reason=I am actually rather outraged that my account was blacked without any prior consultation with me, either to explain any errors or even just as a common courtesy. This is the second disappointment I have had with the way Wiki is being run. The first was when my page was deleted in the same fashion - Despite my comments giving reason why they should not be, my asking for clarification and my asking for advice. My original username was forgottenbooks not because I am a part of that organisation but because that was the only thing I was intending to create a page about. Nobody asked me about this, everyone has just assumed, incorrectly, that I am an employee or similar of Forgotten Books. I am actually So Very Annoyed by this it has totally ruined my morning. The reason I wished to write a page for Forgotten Books is that they are cited as references and other on many many other Wiki pages and yet no info was readily available. I ask you to unban my account and un-delete my article please, if only to prevent my now minuscule faith in humanity from slipping further into the gutter. I am more than happy for my article to be moved back to my user space if it is not currently up to standards and would very much appreciate any advice on what I am apparently doing wrong on this matter. | decline=You were repeatedly warned that continuing to create an [[WP:RS|unsourced]] article on a [[WP:WEB|non-notable subject]] in a [[WP:NPOV|non-neutral tone]] would lead to a block. You continued to create such an article, so a block is the only way to get you to stop. Since there's no indication that you understand the rules and have a plan for following them in the future, an unblock wouldn't be appropriate at this time- and, since you haven't made it clear what [[WP:USERNAME|appropriate username]] you'd be changing to, an unblock wouldn't be possible even if you were willing to follow the rules in future. [[User:FisherQueen|FisherQueen]]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> ([[User talk:FisherQueen|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/FisherQueen|contribs]])</span> 13:36, 28 May 2011 (UTC)}}
{{unblock-spamun|lizziecoles91|I am actually rather outraged that my account was blacked without any prior consultation with me, either to explain any errors or even just as a common courtesy. This is the second disappointment I have had with the way Wiki is being run. The first was when my page was deleted in the same fashion - Despite my comments giving reason why they should not be, my asking for clarification and my asking for advice. My original username was forgottenbooks not because I am a part of that organisation but because that was the only thing I was intending to create a page about. Nobody asked me about this, everyone has just assumed, incorrectly, that I am an employee or similar of Forgotten Books. I am actually So Very Annoyed by this it has totally ruined my morning. The reason I wished to write a page for Forgotten Books is that they are cited as references and other on many many other Wiki pages and yet no info was readily available. I ask you to unban my account and un-delete my article please, if only to prevent my now minuscule faith in humanity from slipping further into the gutter. I am more than happy for my article to be moved back to my user space if it is not currently up to standards and would very much appreciate any advice on what I am apparently doing wrong on this matter. }}
If you truly feel it is inappropriate for Wikipedia to contain any links to books published by this company, unless Wikipedia also hosts free advertisements for this company, I would be happy to work on removing all the links to this web site from Wikipedia. -[[User:FisherQueen|FisherQueen]]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> ([[User talk:FisherQueen|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/FisherQueen|contribs]])</span> 13:52, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:52, 28 May 2011

Welcome!

Hello, Forgottenbooks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Forgotten books.org, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! TransporterMan (TALK) 17:37, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Forgotten books.org requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TransporterMan (TALK) 17:37, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Forgotten Books, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TransporterMan (TALK) 17:39, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Forgotten Books, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard.Template:Z45 --Orange Mike | Talk 22:31, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from writing autobiographical articles, as you did at Forgotten Books. Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged; if you create such an article, it may be deleted. All edits to articles must conform to our policies on no original research, neutral point of view, and avoid conflicts of interest. Please remember that Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, not a personal webspace provider. If your achievements are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Forgotten Books, you may be blocked from editing. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:31, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?
Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, or organization. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
What can I do now?
You are still welcome to write about something other than your company or organization. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
  • Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
  • Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
  • Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, please see how to appeal a block.

Template:Z17--Orange Mike | Talk 22:31, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking to be unblocked to request a change in username.

Ecoles91 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:
I am actually rather outraged that my account was blacked without any prior consultation with me, either to explain any errors or even just as a common courtesy. This is the second disappointment I have had with the way Wiki is being run. The first was when my page was deleted in the same fashion - Despite my comments giving reason why they should not be, my asking for clarification and my asking for advice. My original username was forgottenbooks not because I am a part of that organisation but because that was the only thing I was intending to create a page about. Nobody asked me about this, everyone has just assumed, incorrectly, that I am an employee or similar of Forgotten Books. I am actually So Very Annoyed by this it has totally ruined my morning. The reason I wished to write a page for Forgotten Books is that they are cited as references and other on many many other Wiki pages and yet no info was readily available. I ask you to unban my account and un-delete my article please, if only to prevent my now minuscule faith in humanity from slipping further into the gutter. I am more than happy for my article to be moved back to my user space if it is not currently up to standards and would very much appreciate any advice on what I am apparently doing wrong on this matter.

Administrators should consider discussing any unblock with the blocking administrator (see the blocking policy).

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, please replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un on hold | 1=blocking administrator | 2=lizziecoles91 | 3=I am actually rather outraged that my account was blacked without any prior consultation with me, either to explain any errors or even just as a common courtesy. This is the second disappointment I have had with the way Wiki is being run. The first was when my page was deleted in the same fashion - Despite my comments giving reason why they should not be, my asking for clarification and my asking for advice. My original username was forgottenbooks not because I am a part of that organisation but because that was the only thing I was intending to create a page about. Nobody asked me about this, everyone has just assumed, incorrectly, that I am an employee or similar of Forgotten Books. I am actually So Very Annoyed by this it has totally ruined my morning. The reason I wished to write a page for Forgotten Books is that they are cited as references and other on many many other Wiki pages and yet no info was readily available. I ask you to unban my account and un-delete my article please, if only to prevent my now minuscule faith in humanity from slipping further into the gutter. I am more than happy for my article to be moved back to my user space if it is not currently up to standards and would very much appreciate any advice on what I am apparently doing wrong on this matter. | 4=~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=lizziecoles91 | reason=I am actually rather outraged that my account was blacked without any prior consultation with me, either to explain any errors or even just as a common courtesy. This is the second disappointment I have had with the way Wiki is being run. The first was when my page was deleted in the same fashion - Despite my comments giving reason why they should not be, my asking for clarification and my asking for advice. My original username was forgottenbooks not because I am a part of that organisation but because that was the only thing I was intending to create a page about. Nobody asked me about this, everyone has just assumed, incorrectly, that I am an employee or similar of Forgotten Books. I am actually So Very Annoyed by this it has totally ruined my morning. The reason I wished to write a page for Forgotten Books is that they are cited as references and other on many many other Wiki pages and yet no info was readily available. I ask you to unban my account and un-delete my article please, if only to prevent my now minuscule faith in humanity from slipping further into the gutter. I am more than happy for my article to be moved back to my user space if it is not currently up to standards and would very much appreciate any advice on what I am apparently doing wrong on this matter. | accept=Allowing username change to requested username. Please select an option from [[Wikipedia:Changing username]] and file a request as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, replacing {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=lizziecoles91 | reason=I am actually rather outraged that my account was blacked without any prior consultation with me, either to explain any errors or even just as a common courtesy. This is the second disappointment I have had with the way Wiki is being run. The first was when my page was deleted in the same fashion - Despite my comments giving reason why they should not be, my asking for clarification and my asking for advice. My original username was forgottenbooks not because I am a part of that organisation but because that was the only thing I was intending to create a page about. Nobody asked me about this, everyone has just assumed, incorrectly, that I am an employee or similar of Forgotten Books. I am actually So Very Annoyed by this it has totally ruined my morning. The reason I wished to write a page for Forgotten Books is that they are cited as references and other on many many other Wiki pages and yet no info was readily available. I ask you to unban my account and un-delete my article please, if only to prevent my now minuscule faith in humanity from slipping further into the gutter. I am more than happy for my article to be moved back to my user space if it is not currently up to standards and would very much appreciate any advice on what I am apparently doing wrong on this matter. | decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}