User talk:Ted Wilkes

• Archive: A-1

---

Jacqueline Carey

Just FYI, the Carey who won the fellowship is the one who wrote the Crossley Baby, who does not have an article yet. --Etacar11 20:30, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

DYK

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Tod Sloan, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks Ted Wilkes!

Thank you for your contributions to the Edgar Ray Killen article. I saw all those contributions you had made from your user page...I think its about time you gain a barnstar so I posted one here.

Take care, Dbraceyrules 06:59, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

Tireless

I, V. Molotov, hereby give you this Working Man's Barnstar for the several thousands of contributions you have made to Wikipedia.

Take care, Molotov (talk) 16:52, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

Appreciation.

WikiMedal provided for your enormous number of contributions in the silent film genre. (ExRat)

Just a note of sheer gratitude for your endless creations and additions to the biographies of silent film actors and actresses. It's very much appreciated by me, and your articles are always well-written and researched. Keep up the fantastic work, please! ExRat 09:28, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Silent Film contributions

I second ExRat's emotion. I just noticed your recategorizations on Borden & De Putti this morning (great idea, by the way) and was notably impressed by your other contributions. I don't have the credibility to award medals or anything, but still thought I'd let you know your contributions are appreciated. Also, if you have a list of articles that you're waiting to start, feel free to post them either here or on my talk page, as it would be great to better organize the handful of wikipedians currently working on silent film. Or, alternatively, I can just sort through the stubs. Happy editing! Wencer 16:37, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Please check your WP:NA entry

Greetings, editor! Your name appears on Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct:

1. If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list.
2. If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in bold; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update).
3. Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits.

Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! BDAbramson T 02:34, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Convicted liar Onefortyone on probation

Re your comments on my Talk page] concerning Onefortyone (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). He continues inserting text out of context to deliberately misrepresent the writing of others so as to promote his single Agenda that Elvis Presly was gay. Since the Administrators have done nothing, if Onefortyone continues, you will have to ensure that the Arbitration Committee takes action. Thank you. - Ted Wilkes 18:59, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

I think the best thing for you to do is avoid getting involved in this area, let other editors deal with him. If an article is wrong for a while, it is not an earthshaking event. As the subject is not obscure others will take up the slack if you turn to other things. Lots of Elvis fans to contradict him and if a fuss results it will come to the attention of the administrators. We need to let the wiki process work. Fred Bauder 02:43, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

I agree with Fred here. Particularly given that you've made edits recently that certainly stretch the limits of your probation. Ral315 (talk) 05:18, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

I think Onefortyone is correct that you are violating Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Wilkes,_Wyss_and_Onefortyone#Ted_Wilkes_and_Wyss_banned_from_making_homosexuality.2Fbisexuality_edits. Just let it go, there are thousands of others available to rein in Onefortyone. Fred Bauder 16:41, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from for breaches of WP:Point including posting deliberate mispresentation of an arbcom ruling, edit warring, accusations of lying against multiple users (including calling one user a "convicted liar" and other misbehaviours. You are on probation. If you continue to behave in this manner the the extent of your probation may be extended. FearÉIREANN\^(caint) 03:57, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Cannonballadderley.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cannonballadderley.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 08:12, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

User:Jtdirl

You stated above:

• "You have been temporarily blocked from for breaches of WP:Point including posting deliberate mispresentation of an arbcom ruling, edit warring, accusations of lying against multiple users (including calling one user a "convicted liar" and other misbehaviours. You are on probation. If you continue to behave in this manner the the extent of your probation may be extended."

You previously banned me twice for what you claimed were violations of my Wikipedia:Probation, a probation based on an ArbCom ruling instituted by User:RedWolf24 that denies me the right to edit homosexuality in articles. Your accusations were unilateral and unsupported. Please provide the precise details to support these broad accusation.

Thank you.

Dr. Jtdirl Ph.D.: Please provide your proof that I breached WP:Point and that I was "posting deliberate mispresentation of an arbcom ruling," (whatever "mispresentation" means) that I was "edit warring," and detail your unbelievable use of the broad term "other misbehaviours."

For the record: User:Onefortyone was in fact convicted by the Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee of lying.

Thank you. - Ted Wilkes 14:09, 12 March 2006 (UTC)