Jump to content

User talk:Toddst1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎cease and desist: Trolling very well
Line 63: Line 63:
Toddst1 consider this a cease and desist notice. I am not a sock, troll or vandel. You have failed to provide evidence to your assumtions. Please stay away from me and off my talk page. No further notice is needed. [[Special:Contributions/24.52.237.81|24.52.237.81]] ([[User talk:24.52.237.81|talk]]) 21:17, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Toddst1 consider this a cease and desist notice. I am not a sock, troll or vandel. You have failed to provide evidence to your assumtions. Please stay away from me and off my talk page. No further notice is needed. [[Special:Contributions/24.52.237.81|24.52.237.81]] ([[User talk:24.52.237.81|talk]]) 21:17, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
:Uh, you seem to be trolling fairly well, actually. –[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 00:50, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
:Uh, you seem to be trolling fairly well, actually. –[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 00:50, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi Toddst1, I most likely won't get anywhere with this, but I phoned Wikifoundation @ 415 839 6885 requesting your ip information. I will then contact your provider serving them with a legal notice to provide your identity so I can take legeal action, as you failed to acknowlege my cease and desist notice. BTW I am not a sock, as you will soon find out. I guess this is what happens when you piss off a law student. [[User:99.88,1211.09O|99.88,1211.09O]] ([[User talk:99.88,1211.09O|talk]]) 07:06, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:06, 18 December 2011



Thanks

Thanks for jumping in on the StratoLaunch Systems I am in need of as much help as I can get with this page.MathewDill (talk) 21:25, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. This template: {{cite news}} will probably be helpful to you. Toddst1 (talk) 21:31, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
yeah I will have to get those going soon just wanted to get the basics in that I was really excited when I read this and wanted to share right away. :) MathewDill (talk) 21:33, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of ConBravo!

I'm afraid I don't understand why the ConBravo! article is being deleted. The convention is easily as notable as Con-G or G-Anime and those have established pages without issues? Further, the organisers of these two conventions and the organisers of ConBravo! are related to each other and regularly support each other's conventions. -- Hidoshi (talk) 21:52, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

talkback

Hello, Toddst1. You have new messages at Dondegroovily's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Barnstarbob

Just curious, under what reasoning do you consider Barnstarbob's own comments on his own talk page to be vandalism? I was under the impression it's ok for someone to edit their own page, however they'd like. Having watched this cycle of events repeatedly, the one month block is the longest I've ever seen him receive. It seems both welcome and overdue. Still, is cussing on your own talk page considered vandalism? What was he vandalizing? 842U (talk) 03:14, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, you can not put whatever you want on your talk page. Toddst1 (talk) 03:27, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How does that make his words vandalism? Did you mean something else?842U (talk) 11:18, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you are correct. However, I think you're being pedantic. Toddst1 (talk) 16:11, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possible edit war,Jehovah's Witnesses beliefs

Thank you for your attention in this matter, you may also wish to send a notice to the following users, who may also be engaged in this edit Waring Vyselink and Jeffro77 as Blackcab and Vyselink appear to be, in my opinion, WP:meatpuppet's of Jeffro77 who also has demonstrated WP:COI in regards to editing pages in a manner that is defamatory towards Jehovah's Witnesses.Willietell (talk) 04:45, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page for "Larkin Love" has been deleted

I'm new to creating articles in Wikipedia, but have gone through the basic introduction. Today I've created a page for an American porn actress with the stage name "Larkin Love" and gathered all the required information which're genuine in nature – sadly, the page has been deleted. Kindly give me more information on "A7. No indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content)." and help me retaining that page. Please verify draft page at User:Unknown.freelancer/Larkin_Love. Thank you. —Preceding undated comment added 09:02, 16 December 2011 (UTC).

That draft would also be deleted under A7 - it doesn't assert any importance of the person. Beyond that, you shouldn't re-create that article unless it can pass WP:PORNBIO. Toddst1 (talk) 19:55, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Cheese or Font?"

Dear Toddst1,

I was wondering why the page I wrote "Cheese or Font?" was deleted. I believe it is worthy of mention as it is an existing game which does in fact have a cult following. Also, it was referenced in a BBC Radio 4 documentary presented by Stephen Fry called "Fry's Planet Word". If you still believe this game is not worthy of mention on Wikipedia, please let me know. If not, I'd be grateful if you'd undelete the page. Many thanks. MikeyMikey667 (talk) 19:42, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted under WP:CSD#A7 as web content that doesn't assert any importance. As a courtesy, I've restored it to your userspace at User:MikeyMikey667/Cheese or Font?. Please don't re-create the article unless it passes WP:WEB. Toddst1 (talk) 19:48, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Heiko Schmidt

you have deleted the page "Heiko Schmidt" with the argument this isn't relevant because it is a person. a) it is relevant as Heiko Schmidt is named in many wiki articles regarding SWEETBOX and others and b) Heiko Schmidt is a public person. If your rule is not having an article about a person, you need to delete the following page as well: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L.A._Reid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.251.178.198 (talk) 03:25, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with the article about Heiko Schmidt is that it didn't assert the person's importance - and hence it was deleted under WP:CSD#A7. I'll restore it to the author's user space if you'd like to work on it (that would mean assert importance and better yet add some citations from reliable sources to verify the claims). Are you the author? Toddst1 (talk) 20:13, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

cease and desist

Toddst1 consider this a cease and desist notice. I am not a sock, troll or vandel. You have failed to provide evidence to your assumtions. Please stay away from me and off my talk page. No further notice is needed. 24.52.237.81 (talk) 21:17, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, you seem to be trolling fairly well, actually. –MuZemike 00:50, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Toddst1, I most likely won't get anywhere with this, but I phoned Wikifoundation @ 415 839 6885 requesting your ip information. I will then contact your provider serving them with a legal notice to provide your identity so I can take legeal action, as you failed to acknowlege my cease and desist notice. BTW I am not a sock, as you will soon find out. I guess this is what happens when you piss off a law student. 99.88,1211.09O (talk) 07:06, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]