Jump to content

HMS Agincourt (1913): Difference between revisions

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
referenced in the main body
add to background
Line 73: Line 73:


==Design==
==Design==
===Background===
{{see also|South American dreadnought race#Third stage: another Brazilian dreadnought}}
{{main|South American dreadnought race}}
{{see also|Minas Geraes class battleship|l1=''Minas Geraes''-class battleship}}
[[File:HMS Agincourt Skizze.jpg|250px|left|thumb|Right elevation and plan view of ''Agincourt'']]
[[File:HMS Agincourt Skizze.jpg|250px|left|thumb|Right elevation and plan view of ''Agincourt'']]
In the unstable period during and following an [[Decline and fall of Pedro II of Brazil#Fall|1889 revolution]], which deposed [[Politics of the Empire of Brazil|Emperor]] [[Dom (title)|Dom]] [[Pedro II of Brazil|Pedro II]], and an [[Revolta da Armada|1893&ndash;94 navy revolt]], the Brazilian Navy found itself unable to care for its own ships, let alone acquire new vessels.<ref>Grant, p. 148; Livermore, p. 32; Topliss, p. 240</ref> Meanwhile, Chile and Brazil's principal rival, Argentina, had agreed to a [[Cordillera of the Andes Boundary Case 1902|naval-limiting pact]] in 1902 as part of solving a larger boundary dispute, but they retained the vessels built in the interim, many of which were significantly more modern and powerful than Brazil's ships.<ref>Scheina, pp. 45–52</ref>{{#tag:ref|The only modern armored ships in the Brazilian Navy were two small coast-defense ships launched in 1898.<ref>Gardiner and Gray, p. 403</ref>|group=upper-alpha}} Making matters worse, the Brazilian Navy was left behind its Argentine and Chilean counterparts in quantity as well&mdash;by the turn of the 20th century, Chile's total naval tonnage was {{convert|36896|LT|t}}, Argentina's {{convert|34425|LT|t}}, and Brazil's {{convert|27661|LT|t}}.<ref name=Livermore32>Livermore, p. 32</ref> This was despite Brazil having nearly three times the population of Argentina and almost five times that of Chile.<ref>Gardiner and Gray, p. 403; Livermore, p. 32</ref>
''Agincourt'' was ordered in 1911 as part of the [[South American dreadnought race]] between Brazil, Argentina and Chile in the first decade of the Twentieth Century under the name of ''Rio de Janeiro''. The Brazilians wished to purchase a ship that would outclass those ships building for their rivals. The chief designer of [[Armstrong Whitworth|Armstrong]], [[Eustace Tennyson d'Eyncourt]], had travelled to Brazil to settle on a design and sign the contract. He brought with him a variety of options for the government to consider and they chose the one with the {{convert|12|in|mm|adj=on|0}} guns, partially to maintain commonality with their other battleships already in service.<ref>Topliss, pp. 263–64, 269, 280–81</ref>

[[São Paulo (state)#Early 20th century|Rising international demand for coffee]] and [[rubber boom|rubber]] in the early 20th century brought Brazil an influx of revenue in the early 1900s.<ref>Gardiner and Gray, p. 403</ref> Simultaneously, the [[José Paranhos, Baron of Rio Branco|Baron of Rio Branco]] spearheaded a drive on the part of prominent Brazilians to force the leading world nations to recognize Brazil as an international power.<ref name=Scheina80>Scheina, p. 80</ref> The [[National Congress of Brazil]] drew up and passed a large naval acquisition program in late 1904. Though it was two years before any ships were ordered, and even longer before the ships started building, three [[Minas Geraes class battleship|''Mians Geraes''-class]] [[dreadnought]]s were eventually envisioned under the plan. Two would be built first by the British company [[Armstong Whitworth]], with a third to follow.<ref>Scheina, p. 80; Gardiner and Gray, p. 403; Topliss, p. 240.</ref>

Argentina and Chile were alarmed at the Brazilian move, and they quickly moved to nullify their 1902 pact and acquire dreadnoughts of their own.<ref name=Livermore32/> Argentina's orders, after a [[Rivadavia class battleship#Bidding|drawn-out bidding process]], went to an American company, [[Fore River Shipyard|Fore River Shipbuilding Company]], while Chile's orders, delayed by the [[1906 Valparaíso earthquake]], went to Armstrong.<ref>Hough, p. 22; Livermore, pp. 39–41</ref> Despite these moves, the Brazilian government began negotiating with Armstrong to remove their third dreadnought from the contract, as relations with Argentina were warming and the country's economic boom was losing steam. This was unsuccessful, so they borrowed the necessary money, and Armstrong laid ''Rio de Janeiro''{{'}}s [[keel]] for the first time in March 1910.<ref>Topliss, pp. 247–49</ref>

The Brazilian Navy had divided into two distinct factions, however, based on the size of the main battery. The outgoing naval minister favored an increase over the 12-inch guns mounted on board the ''Minas Geraes'' class, while his incoming counterpart, Admiral [[Marques Leão]], favored keeping the smaller but faster-firing gun. While the exact influences upon the Brazilian government are unclear, Leão was certainly advocating strongly for his position in meetings with the President. Other events probably influenced them as well, such as the November 1910 [[Revolt of the Lash]], payments on loans taken out for the dreadnoughts, and a worsening economy had led to high [[government debt]] compounded by [[Government budget deficit|budget deficits]].<ref>Scheina, pp. 81–82; Topliss, p. 269, Martin, p. 37</ref>{{#tag:ref|Brazil's external and internal debt would reach $500 and $335&nbsp;million (respectively) by 1913, partly through rising deficits, which were $22&nbsp;million in 1908 and $47&nbsp;million by 1912.<ref>Martin, p. 37</ref>|tag=upper-alpha}} By May, the President had certainly made up his mind:

<blockquote><span style="font-size:90%">When I assumed office, I found that my predecessor had signed a contract for the building of the battleship ''Rio de Janeiro'', a vessel of 32,000&nbsp;tons, with an armament of 14 in. guns. Considerations of every kind pointed to the inconvenience of acquiring such a vessel and to the revision of the contract in the sense of reducing the tonnage. This was done, and we shall possess a powerful unit which will not be built on exaggerated lines such as have not as yet stood the time of experience.<ref>Hermes Rodrigues da Fonseca, 3 May 1911, in Scheina, p. 354</ref></span></blockquote>

A contract to build the ship that would become ''Agincourt'' was signed on 3 June 1911, and its keel was laid on 14 September 1911. The design called for a staggering fourteen 12-inch guns, something historian David Topliss attributed to political necessity: the ship had to appear more powerful to the Brazilian populace than her predecessors (with twelve 12-inch guns) but without increasing the gun size, the only option left was increasing the total number of guns.<ref>Topliss, p. 280</ref>


===General characteristics===
===General characteristics===
Line 110: Line 122:


==Construction==
==Construction==
''Rio de Janeiro'', as ''Agincourt'' was named by her first owners, was [[laid down]] on 14 September 1911 by [[Armstrong Whitworth|Armstrongs]] in [[Newcastle upon Tyne]] and [[Ship naming and launching|launched]] on 22 January 1913.<ref name=b45/> However, the rubber trade on which Brazil was reliant collapsed shortly afterward and she was put up for sale in October 1913.<ref>Hough, p. 72</ref> Brazil sold the vessel to the [[Ottoman Navy]] for £2,750,000 on 28 December 1913.<ref>Hough, p. 75</ref> Renamed the ''Sultan Osman I'', she underwent trials in July 1914 and was completed in August, just as [[World War I]] began.<ref>Hough, pp. 109–22</ref>
''Rio de Janeiro'', as ''Agincourt'' was named by her first owners, was [[laid down]] on 14 September 1911 by [[Armstrong Whitworth|Armstrongs]] in [[Newcastle upon Tyne]] and [[Ship naming and launching|launched]] on 22 January 1913.<ref name=b45/> After the keel-laying, however, the Brazilian government found itself in an uneviable position. A European depression after the end of the [[Second Balkan War]] in August 1913 reduced Brazil's ability to obtain foreign loans, which coincided with a collapse in Brazil's coffee and rubber exports, the latter due to the loss of the [[Rubber boom#The end of the Amazon's rubber monopoly|Brazilian rubber monopoly]] to British plantations in the Far East.<ref>Martin, ''Latin America and the War'', 36&ndash;37.</ref>{{#tag:ref|The price of coffee declined by 20% and Brazilian exports of it dropped 12.5% between 1912 and 1913; rubber saw a similar decline of 25 and 36.6%, respectively.<ref>Martin, p. 37</ref>|group=upper-alpha}} In addition, reports on new dreadnought construction coming in from overseas indicated that their vessel would be outclassed upon completion.<ref>Vanterpool, p. 140</ref> These factors caused the Brazilians to put the ship up for sale in October 1913, and they sold her to the [[Ottoman Navy]] for £2,750,000 on 28 December 1913.<ref>Hough, p. 72, 75</ref> Renamed ''Sultan Osman I'', she underwent trials in July 1914 and was completed in August, just as [[World War I]] began.<ref>Hough, pp. 109–22</ref>


===Seizure===
===Seizure===

Revision as of 00:11, 11 May 2012

For other ships with the same name, see HMS Agincourt.

HMS Agincourt in 1915
History
Brazilian Naval EnsignBrazil
NameRio de Janeiro
NamesakeRio de Janeiro
Ordered1911
BuilderArmstrong, Newcastle upon Tyne
Yard number792
Laid down14 September 1911
Launched22 January 1913
FateSold December 1913 to the Ottoman Empire
History
Ottoman Navy EnsignOttoman Empire
NameSultan Osman I
NamesakeSultan Osman I
AcquiredDecember 1913
FateSeized in August 1914 by the United Kingdom
History
Royal Navy EnsignUnited Kingdom
NameHMS Agincourt
NamesakeThe Battle of Agincourt of 1415
Cost£2,900,000 (estimated)
Completed20 August 1914
Acquired3 August 1914
Commissioned7 August 1914
DecommissionedApril 1921
Nickname(s)Gin Palace
FateSold 1922, scrapped 1924
General characteristics (in British service)
TypeDreadnought battleship
Displacementlist error: <br /> list (help)
27,850 long tons (28,300 t) (load)
30,860 long tons (31,360 t) (deep load)
Length671 ft 6 in (204.7 m)
Beam89 ft (27.1 m)
Draught29 ft 10 in (9.1 m)
Installed power34,000 shp (25,000 kW)
Propulsionlist error: <br /> list (help)
4 shafts, 4 Parsons steam turbines
22 Babcock and Wilcox water-tube boilers
Speed22 knots (41 km/h; 25 mph)
Range7,000 nmi (13,000 km; 8,100 mi) at 10 knots (19 km/h; 12 mph)
Complement1268 (1917)
Armamentlist error: <br /> list (help)
7 × 2 - BL 12-inch Mk XIII guns
20 × 1 - BL 6-inch Mk XIII guns
10 × 1 - 3 in (76 mm) guns
3 × 21 in (533 mm) torpedo tubes
Armourlist error: <br /> list (help)
Belt: 9 in (229 mm)*
Deck: 1–2.5 in (25–64 mm)*
Barbettes: 2–9 in (51–229 mm)*
Turrets: 8–12 in (203–305 mm)*
Conning tower: 12 in (305 mm)*
Bulkheads: 2.5–6 in (64–152 mm)*

HMS Agincourt was a dreadnought built in the early 1910s. The ship was originally ordered by Brazil, but the collapse of the rubber boom plus a lessening of the rivalry with Argentina led to her resale while still under construction to the Ottoman Empire who renamed her as Sultan Osman I. Then, with completion just as World War I began, she was seized for use by the Royal Navy, an act which contributed to the decision of the Ottoman Empire to support Germany in the war.

Agincourt held the distinction of mounting more heavy guns (fourteen) and more turrets (seven) than any other battleship ever constructed; this was in response to the Brazilians' requirement for an especially impressive design.

Renamed Agincourt by the British, she joined the Grand Fleet in the North Sea. The ship spent the bulk of her time during the war on patrols and exercises, although she did participate in the Battle of Jutland in 1916. Agincourt was put into reserve in 1919 and sold for scrap in 1922 to meet the terms of the Washington Naval Treaty.

Design

Background

Main article: South American dreadnought race
See also: Minas Geraes-class battleship
Right elevation and plan view of Agincourt

In the unstable period during and following an 1889 revolution, which deposed Emperor Dom Pedro II, and an 1893–94 navy revolt, the Brazilian Navy found itself unable to care for its own ships, let alone acquire new vessels.[1] Meanwhile, Chile and Brazil's principal rival, Argentina, had agreed to a naval-limiting pact in 1902 as part of solving a larger boundary dispute, but they retained the vessels built in the interim, many of which were significantly more modern and powerful than Brazil's ships.[2][A] Making matters worse, the Brazilian Navy was left behind its Argentine and Chilean counterparts in quantity as well—by the turn of the 20th century, Chile's total naval tonnage was 36,896 long tons (37,488 t), Argentina's 34,425 long tons (34,977 t), and Brazil's 27,661 long tons (28,105 t).[4] This was despite Brazil having nearly three times the population of Argentina and almost five times that of Chile.[5]

Rising international demand for coffee and rubber in the early 20th century brought Brazil an influx of revenue in the early 1900s.[6] Simultaneously, the Baron of Rio Branco spearheaded a drive on the part of prominent Brazilians to force the leading world nations to recognize Brazil as an international power.[7] The National Congress of Brazil drew up and passed a large naval acquisition program in late 1904. Though it was two years before any ships were ordered, and even longer before the ships started building, three Mians Geraes-class dreadnoughts were eventually envisioned under the plan. Two would be built first by the British company Armstong Whitworth, with a third to follow.[8]

Argentina and Chile were alarmed at the Brazilian move, and they quickly moved to nullify their 1902 pact and acquire dreadnoughts of their own.[4] Argentina's orders, after a drawn-out bidding process, went to an American company, Fore River Shipbuilding Company, while Chile's orders, delayed by the 1906 Valparaíso earthquake, went to Armstrong.[9] Despite these moves, the Brazilian government began negotiating with Armstrong to remove their third dreadnought from the contract, as relations with Argentina were warming and the country's economic boom was losing steam. This was unsuccessful, so they borrowed the necessary money, and Armstrong laid Rio de Janeiro's keel for the first time in March 1910.[10]

The Brazilian Navy had divided into two distinct factions, however, based on the size of the main battery. The outgoing naval minister favored an increase over the 12-inch guns mounted on board the Minas Geraes class, while his incoming counterpart, Admiral Marques Leão, favored keeping the smaller but faster-firing gun. While the exact influences upon the Brazilian government are unclear, Leão was certainly advocating strongly for his position in meetings with the President. Other events probably influenced them as well, such as the November 1910 Revolt of the Lash, payments on loans taken out for the dreadnoughts, and a worsening economy had led to high government debt compounded by budget deficits.[11]Cite error: The <ref> tag has too many names (see the help page). By May, the President had certainly made up his mind:

When I assumed office, I found that my predecessor had signed a contract for the building of the battleship Rio de Janeiro, a vessel of 32,000 tons, with an armament of 14 in. guns. Considerations of every kind pointed to the inconvenience of acquiring such a vessel and to the revision of the contract in the sense of reducing the tonnage. This was done, and we shall possess a powerful unit which will not be built on exaggerated lines such as have not as yet stood the time of experience.[13]

A contract to build the ship that would become Agincourt was signed on 3 June 1911, and its keel was laid on 14 September 1911. The design called for a staggering fourteen 12-inch guns, something historian David Topliss attributed to political necessity: the ship had to appear more powerful to the Brazilian populace than her predecessors (with twelve 12-inch guns) but without increasing the gun size, the only option left was increasing the total number of guns.[14]

General characteristics

Agincourt had an overall length of 671 ft 6 in (204.7 m), a beam of 89 feet (27 m), and a draught of 29 feet 10 inches (9.1 m) at deep load. She displaced 27,850 long tons (28,297 t) at load and 30,860 long tons (31,355 t) at deep load. She had a metacentric height of 4.9 feet (1.5 m) at deep load.[15] She had a large turning circle, but manoeuvered well despite her great length. Agincourt was considered to be a good gun platform.[16]

She was one of the most comfortable ships in the Royal Navy and very well-appointed internally. A knowledge of Portuguese was necessary to work many of the fittings—including those in the heads—as the original instruction plates had not all been replaced when she was taken over by the British.[16]

Propulsion

Agincourt had four Parsons direct-drive steam turbines, each of which drove one propeller shaft. The high-pressure ahead and astern turbines drove the wing shafts while the low-pressure ahead and astern turbines drove the inner shafts. The three-bladed propellers were 9 feet 6 inches (2.9 m) in diameter. The turbines were designed to produce a total of 34,000 shaft horsepower (25,000 kW), but achieved more than 40,000 shp (30,000 kW) during her sea trials, slightly exceeding her designed speed of 22 knots (41 km/h; 25 mph).[17]

The steam plant consisted of twenty-two Babcock and Wilcox water-tube boilers with an operating pressure of 235 psi (1,620 kPa; 17 kgf/cm2). Agincourt normally carried 1,500 long tons (1,500 t) of coal, but could carry a maximum of 3,200 long tons (3,300 t), as well as 620 long tons (630 t) of fuel oil to be sprayed on the coal to increase its burn rate. At full capacity, she could steam for 7,000 nautical miles (13,000 km; 8,100 mi) at a speed of 10 knots (19 km/h; 12 mph). Electrical power was provided by four steam-driven reciprocating electrical generators.[18]

Armament

Agincourt mounted fourteen BL 12-inch Mk XIII 45-calibre guns in seven twin hydraulically powered turrets,[19] unofficially called after the days of the week, starting from Sunday, forward to aft.[20] This was the greatest number of turrets and heavy guns ever mounted on a battleship.[21] The guns could be depressed to −3° and elevated to 13.5°. They fired 850-pound (386 kg) projectiles at a muzzle velocity of 2,725 ft/s (831 m/s); at 13.5°, this provided a maximum range of just over 20,000 yards with 4crh armour-piercing (AP) shells. During the war the turrets were modified to increase their maximum elevation to 16°, but this only extended the range to 20,435 yards (18,686 m). The rate of fire of these guns was 1.5 rounds per minute.[22] When a full broadside was fired, observers said that: "The resulting sheet of flame was big enough to create the impression that a battle cruiser had blown up; it was awe inspiring."[23] No damage was done to the ship when firing full broadsides, despite the common idea that doing so would break her back, but much of the ship's crockery and glassware would shatter.[24]

As built Agincourt mounted eighteen BL 6-inch Mk XIII 50-calibre guns. Fourteen were placed in armoured casemates on the upper deck and two each in the fore and aft superstructures, protected by gun shields. Two more were added abreast the bridge in pivot mounts protected by gun shields when the ship was purchased by the British.[25] The guns could be depressed to −7° and elevated to 13°, but this was later increased to 15°. They had a range of 13,475 yards (12,322 m) at 15° when firing a 100-pound (45 kg) shell with a muzzle velocity of 2,770 ft/s (840 m/s). Their rate of fire was about five to seven rounds per minute, but this dropped to about three rounds per minute after the ready ammunition was used up because the ammunition hoists were too slow or few to keep the guns fully supplied. About 150 rounds were carried per gun.[26]

Close-range defence against torpedo boats was provided by ten 3-inch (76 mm) 45-calibre quick-firing guns. These were mounted in the superstructure in pivot mounts and protected by gun shields. Agincourt also carried three 21-inch (533 mm) submerged torpedo tubes; one was on each beam and the last was in the stern. The water that entered the torpedo tubes when they were fired was discharged into the torpedo flat to facilitate reloading the tube and then pumped overboard. This meant that the crew would be operating in 3 feet (0.9 m) of water if rapid fire was required. Ten torpedoes were carried for them.[27]

Fire control

Each turret was fitted with an armoured rangefinder in the turret roof. In addition another one was mounted on top of the foretop. By the time of the Battle of Jutland in 1916, Agincourt was possibly the only dreadnought of the Grand Fleet not fitted with a Dreyer fire-control table.[28] A fire-control director was later fitted below the foretop and one turret was modified to control the entire main armament later in the war.[18] A director for the 6-inch (152 mm) guns was added on each side in 1916–17.[25]

Armour

So much weight had been devoted to Agincourt's armament that little remained for her armour. Her waterline belt was just 9 inches (229 mm) thick, compared with twelve inches or more found in other British dreadnoughts. It ran some 365 feet (111.3 m), from the forward edge of 'Monday' barbette to the middle of 'Friday' barbette. Forward of this the belt thinned to six inches for about 50 feet (15.2 m) before further reducing to 4 inches (102 mm) all the way to the bow. Aft of the midships section the belt reduced to six inches for about 30 feet (9.1 m) and then thinned to four inches (102 mm); it did not reach the stern, but terminated at the rear bulkhead. The upper belt extended from the main to the upper deck and was six inches thick. It ran from 'Monday' barbette to 'Thursday' barbette. The armour bulkheads at each end of the ship angled inwards from the ends of the midships armoured belts to the end barbettes and were three inches thick. Four of Agincourt's decks were armoured with thicknesses varying from 1 to 2.5 inches (25 to 64 mm).[29]

The armour of the barbettes constituted a major weakness in Agincourt's protection. They were nine inches thick above the upper deck level, but decreased to three inches between the upper and main decks and had no armour at all below the main deck except for 'Sunday' barbette (which had three inches), and 'Thursday' and 'Saturday' barbettes (which had two inches). The turret armour was twelve inches thick on the face, 8 inches (203 mm) on the side and 10 inches (254 mm) in the rear. The turret roofs were three inches thick at the front and two inches at the rear. The casemates for the secondary armament were protected by six inches of armour and were defended from raking fire by six-inch thick bulkheads.[18]

The main conning tower was protected by twelve inches of armour on its sides and it had a four-inch roof. The aft conning tower (sometimes called the torpedo control tower) had nine-inch sides and a three-inch roof. The communications tube down from each position was six-inches thick above the upper deck and two-inches thick below it. Each magazine was protected by two armour plates on each side as torpedo bulkheads, the first one inch thick and the second one and a half inches thick.[25]

Agincourt had another weakness in that she was not subdivided to Royal Navy standards as the Brazilians preferred to eliminate all possible watertight bulkheads that might limit the size of the compartments and interfere with the crew's comfort. One example was the officer's wardroom, which was 85 by 60 feet (25.9 by 18.3 m) in size; much larger than anything in the Grand Fleet.[30]

Wartime modifications

Approximately 70 long tons (71 t) of high-tensile steel to the main deck was added after the Battle of Jutland to protect the magazines. Two 3-inch (76 mm) anti-aircraft guns were added to the quarterdeck in 1917–18. A 9-foot (2.7 m) rangefinder was added to the former searchlight platform on the foremast at the same time. A high-angle rangefinder was added to the spotting top in 1918.[25]

Construction

Rio de Janeiro, as Agincourt was named by her first owners, was laid down on 14 September 1911 by Armstrongs in Newcastle upon Tyne and launched on 22 January 1913.[18] After the keel-laying, however, the Brazilian government found itself in an uneviable position. A European depression after the end of the Second Balkan War in August 1913 reduced Brazil's ability to obtain foreign loans, which coincided with a collapse in Brazil's coffee and rubber exports, the latter due to the loss of the Brazilian rubber monopoly to British plantations in the Far East.[31][B] In addition, reports on new dreadnought construction coming in from overseas indicated that their vessel would be outclassed upon completion.[33] These factors caused the Brazilians to put the ship up for sale in October 1913, and they sold her to the Ottoman Navy for £2,750,000 on 28 December 1913.[34] Renamed Sultan Osman I, she underwent trials in July 1914 and was completed in August, just as World War I began.[35]

Seizure

The war broke out during her sea trials before delivery. Even though the Ottoman crew had arrived to collect her, the British Government took over the vessel for incorporation into the Royal Navy. At the same time the British also took over a second Ottoman battleship, a King George V class-derived vessel being built by Vickers—the Reshadiye—which was renamed HMS Erin. Such an action was allowed for in the contracts, as then-First Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill did not want to risk the ships being used against the British, but it had consequences.[36]

The takeover caused considerable ill will in the Ottoman Empire, where public subscriptions had partially funded the ships. When the Ottoman government had been in a financial deadlock over the budget of the battleships, people's donations were solicited. In taverns, cafés, schools and markets many donated some amount of money for the Ottoman Navy. To encourage this campaign, plentiful donations were awarded with a medal called the "Navy Donation Medal". This proved an important factor in turning Ottoman public opinion against Britain, especially as the Ottoman Navy had been pro-Britain — the Army having been pro-German. It helped bring the Ottoman Empire into the war on the side of Germany and the Austro-Hungarian Empire against the Triple Entente of Britain, France, and Russia on 29 October 1914.[37]

Modifications for the Royal Navy

The Royal Navy made modifications before commissioning her: in particular they removed the flying deck over the two centre turrets. The ship was also initially fitted with Turkish-style lavatories that had to be replaced.[38] Her name, "Agincourt", was a favourite of Churchill's, and had initially been allocated to a sixth vessel of the Queen Elizabeth-class ordered under the 1914-15 Naval Estimates, but not yet begun at the war's outbreak.[39] Her nickname, The Gin Palace, came from her luxurious fittings and a corruption of her name (A Gin Court), Pink Gin having been a popular drink among Royal Navy officers at the time.[40]

The Admiralty was unprepared to man a ship of Agincourt's size on such short notice and her crew was drawn "from the highest and lowest echelons of the service: the Royal yachts, and the detention barracks." Agincourt's captain and executive officer came from HMY Victoria and Albert III, most of whose crew was also transferred to Agincourt on 3 August 1914. Most of the naval reservists had already been called up by this time and sent to other ships so a number of minor criminals who had had their sentences remitted were received from various naval prisons and detention camps.[41]

Service

Agincourt was working up until 7 September 1914 when she joined the 4th Battle Squadron (BS) of the Grand Fleet.[42] The fleet anchorage at Scapa Flow was not yet secure against submarine attack and much of the fleet was kept at sea where Agincourt spent forty of her first eighty days with the Grand Fleet. This was the beginning of "a year and a half of inaction, only broken by occasional North Sea "sweeps" intended to draw the enemy from his bases."[43]

On 1 January 1915 she was still assigned to the 4th BS, but had been assigned to the 1st Battle Squadron before the Battle of Jutland on 31 May 1916. Agincourt was the last ship of the Sixth Division of the 1st BS, along with HMS Hercules, HMS Revenge and the flagship, HMS Marlborough, the most heterogeneous group possible as each ship was from a different class. The Sixth Division was the starboardmost column of the Grand Fleet as it headed south to rendezvous with Admiral Beatty's Battlecruiser Fleet, then engaged with their opposite numbers from the German High Seas Fleet in the North Sea.[44] Admiral Jellicoe, commander of the Grand Fleet, kept it in cruising formation until 6:15 p.m.[Note 1] when he ordered it to deploy from column into a single line based on the port division, each ship turning 90° in succession. This turn made the Sixth Division the closest ships in the Grand Fleet to the battleships of the High Seas Fleet and they fired on each ship as they made their turn to port. This concentration of fire later became known as "Windy Corner" to the British as the ships were drenched by German shell splashes although none were hit.[45]

At 6:24 Agincourt opened fire on a German battlecruiser with her main guns. Shortly afterwards her six-inch guns followed suit as German destroyers made torpedo attacks on the British battleships to cover the turn to the south of the High Seas Fleet.[46] Agincourt successfully evaded two torpedoes.[47] Visibility cleared around 7:15 and Agincourt engaged a Kaiser-class battleship without result before it was lost in the smoke and haze.[48] Around 8:00 Marlborough was forced to reduce speed because of the strain on her bulkheads from her torpedo damage and her division mates conformed to her speed.[49] In the reduced visibility the division lost sight of the Grand Fleet during the night, passing the badly damaged battlecruiser SMS Seydlitz without opening fire.[50] Dawn found them with only the detritus from the previous day's battle in sight and the division arrived back at Scapa Flow on 2 June.[51] Agincourt fired 144 twelve-inch shells and 111 six-inch shells during the battle although she is not known to have hit anything.[42]

Both of the seized Ottoman ships in 1918: Agincourt (foreground) with Erin

Although the Grand Fleet made several sorties over the next few years it is not known if Agincourt participated in them. On 23 March 1918, Agincourt and Hercules were stationed at Scapa Flow to provide cover for the Scandinavian convoys between Norway and Britain when the High Seas Fleet sortied in an attempt to destroy the convoy. The reports from German Intelligence were slightly off schedule, however, as both the inbound and outbound convoys were in port when the Germans reached their normal route so Admiral Scheer ordered the fleet to return to Germany without spotting any British ships.[52]

Agincourt was later transferred to the 2nd Battle Squadron[42] and she was present at the surrender of the High Seas Fleet on 21 November 1918.[53] She was placed in reserve at Rosyth in March 1919. After unsuccessful attempts to sell her to the Brazilian Government, she was briefly recommissioned for experimental purposes in 1921. She was sold for scrap on 19 December 1922 to comply with the tonnage limitations of the Washington Naval Treaty, although she was not actually broken up until the end of 1924.[25]

Notes

  1. ^ The times used in this article are in UTC, which is one hour behind CET, which is often used in German works.

Footnotes

  1. ^ Grant, p. 148; Livermore, p. 32; Topliss, p. 240
  2. ^ Scheina, pp. 45–52
  3. ^ Gardiner and Gray, p. 403
  4. ^ a b Livermore, p. 32
  5. ^ Gardiner and Gray, p. 403; Livermore, p. 32
  6. ^ Gardiner and Gray, p. 403
  7. ^ Scheina, p. 80
  8. ^ Scheina, p. 80; Gardiner and Gray, p. 403; Topliss, p. 240.
  9. ^ Hough, p. 22; Livermore, pp. 39–41
  10. ^ Topliss, pp. 247–49
  11. ^ Scheina, pp. 81–82; Topliss, p. 269, Martin, p. 37
  12. ^ Martin, p. 37
  13. ^ Hermes Rodrigues da Fonseca, 3 May 1911, in Scheina, p. 354
  14. ^ Topliss, p. 280
  15. ^ Burt, p. 244
  16. ^ a b Parkes, p. 604
  17. ^ Burt, pp. 245, 250
  18. ^ a b c d Burt, p. 245
  19. ^ Gardiner and Gray, p. 37
  20. ^ Hough, p. 150
  21. ^ Gibbons, p. 201
  22. ^ "British 12"/45 (30.5 cm) Mark XIII". navweaps.com. 20 February 2009. Retrieved 4 May 2010.
  23. ^ Parkes, p. 603
  24. ^ Hough, p. 160
  25. ^ a b c d e Burt, p. 250
  26. ^ "British 6"/50 (15.2 cm) BL Mark XIII". navweaps.com. 22 January 2009. Retrieved 4 May 2010.
  27. ^ Parkes, pp. 600, 603
  28. ^ Friedman, p. 46
  29. ^ Burt, pp. 244–45
  30. ^ Hough, pp. 89–90
  31. ^ Martin, Latin America and the War, 36–37.
  32. ^ Martin, p. 37
  33. ^ Vanterpool, p. 140
  34. ^ Hough, p. 72, 75
  35. ^ Hough, pp. 109–22
  36. ^ Hough, p. 121
  37. ^ Hough, pp. 143–44
  38. ^ Hough, pp. 152–53
  39. ^ Parkes, p. 600
  40. ^ Hough, p. 147
  41. ^ Hough, pp. 148–52
  42. ^ a b c Parkes, p. 605
  43. ^ Hough, p. 161
  44. ^ Hough, p. 174
  45. ^ Hough, p. 179
  46. ^ Tarrant, pp. 131, 133
  47. ^ Massie, p. 630
  48. ^ Hough, p. 183
  49. ^ Burt, p. 206
  50. ^ Massie, p. 651
  51. ^ Hough, pp. 184–85
  52. ^ Newbolt, pp. 236–37
  53. ^ Hough, p. 186

Bibliography

  • Burt, R. A. (1986). British Battleships of World War One. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 0-87021-863-8.
  • Friedman, Norman (2008). Naval Firepower: Battleship Guns and Gunnery in the Dreadnought Era. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-59114-555-4.
  • Gardiner, Robert; Gray, Randal, eds. (1984). Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships: 1906–1922. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 0-85177-245-5.
  • Gibbons, Tony (1983). The Complete Encyclopedia of Battleships: A Technical Directory of Capital Ships from 1860 to the Present Day. New York: Crescent Books. ISBN 0-517-37810-8.
  • Hough, Richard (1967). The Great Dreadnought: The Strange Story of H.M.S. Agincourt: The Mightiest Battleship of World War I. New York: Harper & Row. OCLC 914101.
  • Massie, Robert (2004). Castles of Steel: Britain, Germany and the Winning of the Great War. New York: Random House. ISBN 0224040928.
  • Newbolt, Henry. Naval Operations. History of the Great War: Based on Official Documents. Vol. V (reprint of the 1931 ed.). London and Nashville, Tennessee: Imperial War Museum and Battery Press. ISBN 1-870423-72-0.
  • Parkes, Oscar (1990). British Battleships (reprint of the 1957 ed.). Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-55750-075-4.
  • Tarrant, V. E. (1999). Jutland: The German Perspective: A New View of the Great Battle, 31 May 1916 (reprint of the 1995 ed.). London: Brockhampton Press. ISBN 1-86019-917-8.
  • Topliss, David (1988). "The Brazilian Dreadnoughts, 1904-1914". Warship International. XXV (3). Toledo, Ohio: International Naval Research Organization: 240–89. ISSN 0043-0374.

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to HMS Agincourt (ship, 1913).


Cite error: There are <ref group=upper-alpha> tags or {{efn-ua}} templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=upper-alpha}} template or {{notelist-ua}} template (see the help page).

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HMS_Agincourt_(1913)&oldid=491902671"