User talk:LeoFrank: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
[http://www.ekal.org/content/buytickets Buy tickets now]. [[User:Aymatth2|Aymatth2]] ([[User talk:Aymatth2|talk]]) 18:33, 19 May 2012 (UTC) |
[http://www.ekal.org/content/buytickets Buy tickets now]. [[User:Aymatth2|Aymatth2]] ([[User talk:Aymatth2|talk]]) 18:33, 19 May 2012 (UTC) |
||
{{Talkback|Nmisra}} |
Revision as of 04:12, 20 May 2012
This is LeoFrank's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22Auto-archiving period: 10 days ![]() |
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
ORR Bangalore
I've reverted your edit for now. There are no articles for other ring roads. I'll split them, or rename this article into a generic one this weekend. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:03, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- Forgot to mention that other Ring Road articles point to this one. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:22, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- Ok. No Worries.
— Abhishek Talk 09:17, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- Ok. No Worries.
- I specified ABOVE that I have undone your edit so I could split the article, but I guess you didn't read it. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 16:31, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- I never denied that. But tomorrow if someone looks at the article history it would be like you undid vandalism, coz that's what rollback is used for. And I never disagreed with your revert on BIAL. Since you happen to disagree, you should have either used twinkle rollback or just the undo button. — Abhishek Talk 16:45, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- I specified ABOVE that I have undone your edit so I could split the article, but I guess you didn't read it. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 16:31, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- Twinkle doesn't work for me any longer. It works once in a blue moon. I'll manually undo it. Thanks for your advice. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 16:53, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
BIAL
Two IPs have removed the ref for Mauritius from the BIAL article. If this continues, I'll request for temporary semi protect. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:27, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- I did notice that. The ref seems to be broken now. And the plan of terminating BLR has been withdrawn by the airline. — Abhishek Talk 08:32, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Do we need a source for that? I doubt it. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:39, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- We do not have a source for it. But I have checked with the booking engine of the airline and flights exists way after 22 October. — Abhishek Talk 08:41, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- To add. The Air Mauritius destinations article has no mention of BLR being terminated. — Abhishek Talk 08:44, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- We do not have a source for it. But I have checked with the booking engine of the airline and flights exists way after 22 October. — Abhishek Talk 08:41, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Do we need a source for that? I doubt it. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:39, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Meetup?
Hi Abhishek
How about a Wiki-meetup in Hyderabad this summer?...It's been almost an year since the last year. Thanks Srikar Kashyap<<Talk>>14:58, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- That's a nice idea. But I stay in Bangalore :( — Abhishek Talk 16:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Bangalore
The talk page of the article seems to inactive at the moment, so I think it would be useless to revert edits and ask for a consensus :-). We might have to directly say our reasons in the summary or fix it if possible. Thanks! Secret of success (talk) 15:55, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Squawk
Buy tickets now. Aymatth2 (talk) 18:33, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.