Jump to content

Talk:From Noon till Three: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Move?: new section
No edit summary
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 24: Line 24:
* (with From Noon till Three as a redirect to From Noon Till Three). Move according to spelling conventions for titles. – [[User:Ὁ οἶστρος|ὁ οἶστρος]] ([[User talk:Ὁ οἶστρος|talk]]) 12:06, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
* (with From Noon till Three as a redirect to From Noon Till Three). Move according to spelling conventions for titles. – [[User:Ὁ οἶστρος|ὁ οἶστρος]] ([[User talk:Ὁ οἶστρος|talk]]) 12:06, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
* Here, "till" is acting as a preposition with fewer than 5 letters. [[User:Anthony Appleyard|Anthony Appleyard]] ([[User talk:Anthony Appleyard|talk]]) 15:18, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
* Here, "till" is acting as a preposition with fewer than 5 letters. [[User:Anthony Appleyard|Anthony Appleyard]] ([[User talk:Anthony Appleyard|talk]]) 15:18, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
* So, what about ''[[From Dusk Till Dawn]]'', then? Also spelled that way at IMDb and, well, close to everywhere. – [[User:Ὁ οἶστρος|ὁ οἶστρος]] ([[User talk:Ὁ οἶστρος|talk]]) 17:21, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:22, 5 August 2012

WikiProject iconFilm Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

better description/analysis needed

This film has been largely forgotten, and is rarely shown. It was available only on VHS, and is out of print. I saw it for the first time on AMC, and am watching it right now for only the second time on the "this" network.

This article does not capture what a nasty black satire From Noon Till Three is. The target is the American willingness to reveal every sordid detail of one's life in exchange for fame and wealth -- and approval. The film is a major disappointment, thoroughly torpedoed by miserable TV-quality cinematography, Frank Gilroy's inability to find the right tone, + and worst of all, Charles Bronson's charmless, "line-reading" performance, only slightly better than high-school theatrics. It's impossible to believe that Amanda (played by Bronson's wife!) saw anything in him.

The version I'm watching appears to be a botched edit. Amanda says she recognizes Graham before he shows her "the thing that's not in the book" (his, uh, you know). I suspect both versions were shot (the tamer one intended for TV), but both made it into the film.

Nevertheless, the subject matter alone makes this a significant film, and this article needs a more-thorough analysis and evaluation.

+ Gilroy, a famous playwright, wrote the novel on which the film is based. One normally expects writers to do a good job directing their own material, but Gilroy blows it. If nothing else, the style isn't dark or serious enough for the satire to work very well, and it comes off more as a farce. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 00:02, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bronson and Ireland

Move?

From Noon till ThreeFrom Noon Till Three