Jump to content

Heegner number: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
do not fall to such heresy as <math>262,537,412,640,768,743</math>! it is rendered with unreadable spaces after commas
Line 1: Line 1:
In [[number theory]], a '''Heegner number''' is a [[Square-free integer|square-free positive integer]] ''d'' such that the [[imaginary quadratic field]] '''Q'''(√&minus;''d'') has [[ideal class group|class number]] 1. Equivalently, its [[ring of integers]] has [[unique factorization]].<ref>{{cite book
In [[number theory]], a '''Heegner number''' is a [[Square-free integer|square-free positive integer]] ''d'' such that the imaginary [[quadratic field]] '''Q'''({{sqrt|−''d''}}) has [[ideal class group|class number]] 1. Equivalently, its [[ring of integers]] has [[unique factorization]].<ref>{{cite book
| last = Conway
| last = Conway
| first = John Horton
| first = John Horton
Line 38: Line 38:
<math>e^{\pi \sqrt{163}}</math>, which is an [[almost integer]], in that it is [[Mathematical coincidence#Containing pi or e and number 163|very close]] to an [[integer]]:
<math>e^{\pi \sqrt{163}}</math>, which is an [[almost integer]], in that it is [[Mathematical coincidence#Containing pi or e and number 163|very close]] to an [[integer]]:


:<math>e^{\pi \sqrt{163}} = 262,537,412,640,768,743.999\ 999\ 999\ 999\ 25\ldots</math> <ref>[http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RamanujanConstant.html Ramanujan Constant &ndash; from Wolfram MathWorld<!-- Bot-generated title -->]</ref> <math>\approx 640,320^3+744.</math>
:<math>e^{\pi \sqrt{163}} =\ </math>{{math|size=120%|262,537,412,640,768,743.999 999 999 999 25…}}<!-- don't put thousands separators under <math>! --><ref>[http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RamanujanConstant.html Ramanujan Constant &ndash; from Wolfram MathWorld<!-- Bot-generated title -->]</ref> <math>\approx 640320^3+744.</math><!-- don't put thousands separators under <math>! -->


This number was discovered in 1859 by the mathematician [[Charles Hermite]].<ref>{{cite book
This number was discovered in 1859 by the mathematician [[Charles Hermite]].<ref>{{cite book
Line 61: Line 61:
</ref> "Mathematical Games" columnist [[Martin Gardner]] made the (hoax) claim that the number was in fact an integer, and that the Indian mathematical genius [[Srinivasa Ramanujan]] had predicted it—hence its name.
</ref> "Mathematical Games" columnist [[Martin Gardner]] made the (hoax) claim that the number was in fact an integer, and that the Indian mathematical genius [[Srinivasa Ramanujan]] had predicted it—hence its name.


This coincidence is explained by [[complex multiplication]] and the [[Q-expansion|''q''-expansion]] of the [[j-invariant]].
This coincidence is explained by [[complex multiplication]] and the [[q-expansion|''q''-expansion]] of the [[j-invariant]].


===Detail===
===Detail===
Briefly, <math>j((1+\sqrt{-d})/2)</math> is an integer for ''d'' a Heegner number, and <math>e^{\pi \sqrt{d}} \approx -j((1+\sqrt{-d})/2) + 744</math> via the ''q''-expansion.
Briefly, <math>j((1+\sqrt{-d})/2)</math> is an integer for&nbsp;''d'' a Heegner number, and <math>e^{\pi \sqrt{d}} \approx -j((1+\sqrt{-d})/2) + 744</math> via the ''q''-expansion.


If <math>\tau</math> is a quadratic irrational, then the ''j''-invariant is an [[algebraic integer]] of degree <math>|\mbox{Cl}(\mathbf{Q}(\tau))|</math>, the [[Class number (number theory)|class number]] of <math>\mathbf{Q}(\tau)</math> and the minimal (monic integral) polynomial it satisfies is called the '''Hilbert class polynomial'''. Thus if the imaginary quadratic extension <math>\mathbf{Q}(\tau)</math> has class number 1 (so ''d'' is a Heegner number), the ''j''-invariant is an integer.
If <math>\tau</math> is a quadratic irrational, then the ''j''-invariant is an [[algebraic integer]] of degree <math>|\mbox{Cl}(\mathbf{Q}(\tau))|</math>, the [[Class number (number theory)|class number]] of <math>\mathbf{Q}(\tau)</math> and the minimal (monic integral) polynomial it satisfies is called the '''Hilbert class polynomial'''. Thus if the imaginary quadratic extension <math>\mathbf{Q}(\tau)</math> has class number 1 (so ''d'' is a Heegner number), the ''j''-invariant is an integer.
Line 70: Line 70:
The [[Q-expansion|''q''-expansion]] of ''j'', with its [[Fourier series]] expansion written as a [[Laurent series]] in terms of <math>q=\exp(2 \pi i \tau)</math>, begins as:
The [[Q-expansion|''q''-expansion]] of ''j'', with its [[Fourier series]] expansion written as a [[Laurent series]] in terms of <math>q=\exp(2 \pi i \tau)</math>, begins as:


:<math>j(q) = \frac{1}{q} + 744 + 196,884 q + \cdots.</math>
:<math>j(q) = \frac{1}{q} + 744 + 196884 q + \cdots.</math><!-- don't put thousands separators under <math>! -->


The coefficients <math>c_n</math> asymptotically grow as <math>\ln(c_n) \sim 4\pi \sqrt{n} + O(\ln(n))</math>, and the low order coefficients grow more slowly than <math>200,000^n</math>, so for <math>q \ll 1/200,000</math>, ''j'' is very well approximated by its first two terms. Setting <math>\tau = (1+\sqrt{-163})/2</math> yields <math>q=-\exp(-\pi \sqrt{163})</math> or equivalently, <math>\frac{1}{q}=-\exp(\pi \sqrt{163})</math>. Now <math>j((1+\sqrt{-163})/2)=(-640,320)^3</math>, so,
The coefficients <math>c_n</math> asymptotically grow as <math>\ln(c_n) \sim 4\pi \sqrt{n} + O(\ln(n))</math>, and the low order coefficients grow more slowly than <math>200000^n</math>, so for <math>q \ll 1/200000</math>, ''j'' is very well approximated by its first two terms. Setting <math>\tau = (1+\sqrt{-163})/2</math> yields <math>q=-\exp(-\pi \sqrt{163})</math> or equivalently, <math>\frac{1}{q}=-\exp(\pi \sqrt{163})</math>. Now <math>j((1+\sqrt{-163})/2)=(-640320)^3</math>, so,
:<math>(-640,320)^3=-e^{\pi \sqrt{163}}+744+O\left(e^{-\pi \sqrt{163}}\right).</math>
:<math>(-640320)^3=-e^{\pi \sqrt{163}}+744+O\left(e^{-\pi \sqrt{163}}\right).</math><!-- don't put thousands separators under <math>! -->
Or,
Or,
:<math>e^{\pi \sqrt{163}}=640,320^3+744+O\left(e^{-\pi \sqrt{163}}\right)</math>
:<math>e^{\pi \sqrt{163}}=640320^3+744+O\left(e^{-\pi \sqrt{163}}\right)</math>
where the linear term of the error is,
where the linear term of the error is,
:<math>-196,884/e^{\pi \sqrt{163}} \approx 196,884/(640,320^3+744)
:<math>-196884/e^{\pi \sqrt{163}} \approx 196884/(640320^3+744)
\approx -0.00000000000075</math>
\approx -0.00000000000075</math><!-- don't put thousands separators under <math>! -->
explaining why <math>e^{\pi \sqrt{163}}</math> is within approximately the above of being an integer.
explaining why <math>e^{\pi \sqrt{163}}</math> is within approximately the above of being an integer.


==Other Heegner numbers==
==Other Heegner numbers==
For the four largest Heegner numbers, the approximations one obtains<ref>These can be checked by computing <math>\sqrt[3]{e^{\pi\sqrt{d}}-744}</math> on a calculator, and
For the four largest Heegner numbers, the approximations one obtains<ref>These can be checked by computing <math>\sqrt[3]{e^{\pi\sqrt{d}}-744}</math> on a calculator, and
<math>196,884/e^{\pi\sqrt{d}}</math> for the linear term of the error.</ref> are as follows.
<math>196884/e^{\pi\sqrt{d}}</math> for the linear term of the error.</ref> are as follows.


:<math>\begin{align}
:<math>\begin{align}
e^{\pi \sqrt{19}} &\approx 96^3+744-0.22\\
e^{\pi \sqrt{19}} &\approx 96^3+744-0.22\\
e^{\pi \sqrt{43}} &\approx 960^3+744-0.00022\\
e^{\pi \sqrt{43}} &\approx 960^3+744-0.00022\\
e^{\pi \sqrt{67}} &\approx 5,280^3+744-0.0000013\\
e^{\pi \sqrt{67}} &\approx 5280^3+744-0.0000013\\
e^{\pi \sqrt{163}} &\approx 640,320^3+744-0.00000000000075
e^{\pi \sqrt{163}} &\approx 640320^3+744-0.00000000000075
\end{align}
\end{align}
</math><!-- don't put thousands separators under <math>! -->
</math>


Alternatively,<ref>http://groups.google.com.ph/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/3d24137c9a860893?hl=en#</ref>
Alternatively,<ref>http://groups.google.com.ph/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/3d24137c9a860893?hl=en#</ref>
Line 101: Line 101:
\end{align}
\end{align}
</math>
</math>
where the reason for the squares is due to certain [[Eisenstein series]]. For Heegner numbers ''d'' < 19, one does not obtain an almost integer; even ''d'' = 19 is not noteworthy.<ref>The absolute deviation of a random real number (picked uniformly from [0,1], say) is a uniformly distributed variable on [0,0.5], so it has [[absolute average deviation]] and [[median absolute deviation]] of 0.25, and a deviation of 0.22 is not exceptional.</ref> The integer ''j''-invariants are highly factorable, which follows from the <math>12^3(n^2-1)^3=(2^2\cdot 3 \cdot (n-1) \cdot (n+1))^3</math> form, and factor as,
where the reason for the squares is due to certain [[Eisenstein series]]. For Heegner numbers <math>d < 19</math>, one does not obtain an almost integer; even <math>d = 19</math> is not noteworthy.<ref>The absolute deviation of a random real number (picked uniformly from [[unit interval|{{closed-closed|0,1|size=120%}}]], say) is a uniformly distributed variable on {{closed-closed|0, 0.5|size=120%}}, so it has [[absolute average deviation]] and [[median absolute deviation]] of 0.25, and a deviation of 0.22 is not exceptional.</ref> The integer ''j''-invariants are highly factorisable, which follows from the <math>12^3(n^2-1)^3=(2^2\cdot 3 \cdot (n-1) \cdot (n+1))^3</math> form, and factor as,


:<math>\begin{align}
:<math>\begin{align}
j((1+\sqrt{-19})/2) &= 96^3 =(2^5 \cdot 3)^3\\
j((1+\sqrt{-19})/2) &= 96^3 =(2^5 \cdot 3)^3\\
j((1+\sqrt{-43})/2) &= 960^3=(2^6 \cdot 3 \cdot 5)^3\\
j((1+\sqrt{-43})/2) &= 960^3=(2^6 \cdot 3 \cdot 5)^3\\
j((1+\sqrt{-67})/2) & =5,280^3=(2^5 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdot 11)^3\\
j((1+\sqrt{-67})/2) & =5280^3=(2^5 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdot 11)^3\\
j((1+\sqrt{-163})/2) &=640,320^3=(2^6 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdot 23 \cdot 29)^3.
j((1+\sqrt{-163})/2) &=640320^3=(2^6 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdot 23 \cdot 29)^3.
\end{align}
\end{align}
</math><!-- don't put thousands separators under <math>! -->
</math>


These [[transcendental numbers]], in addition to being closely approximated by integers, (which are simply [[algebraic numbers]] of degree 1), can also be closely approximated by algebraic numbers of degree 3,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://sites.google.com/site/tpiezas/001|title=Pi Formulas}}</ref>
These [[transcendental numbers]], in addition to being closely approximated by integers, (which are simply [[algebraic numbers]] of degree&nbsp;1), can also be closely approximated by algebraic numbers of degree&nbsp;3,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://sites.google.com/site/tpiezas/001|title=Pi Formulas}}</ref>


:<math>\begin{align}
:<math>\begin{align}
Line 131: Line 131:
</math>
</math>


Note the reappearance of the integers n = {3, 9, 21, 231} as well as the fact that,
Note the reappearance of the integers <math>n = 3, 9, 21, 231</math> as well as the fact that,


:<math>\begin{align}
:<math>\begin{align}
Line 139: Line 139:
&2^6 \cdot 3(-26679^2+3 \cdot 163 \cdot 2413^2) = 640320^2
&2^6 \cdot 3(-26679^2+3 \cdot 163 \cdot 2413^2) = 640320^2
\end{align}
\end{align}
</math><!-- don't put thousands separators under <math>! -->
</math>


which, with the appropriate fractional power, are precisely the j-invariants. As well as for algebraic numbers of degree 6,
which, with the appropriate fractional power, are precisely the j-invariants. As well as for algebraic numbers of degree&nbsp;6,


:<math>\begin{align}
:<math>\begin{align}
Line 151: Line 151:
</math>
</math>


where the ''x's'' are given respectively by the appropriate root of the [[sextic equation]]s,
where the ''x''s are given respectively by the appropriate root of the [[sextic equation]]s,


:<math>\begin{align}
:<math>\begin{align}
Line 159: Line 159:
&5x^6-640320x^5-10x^3+1=0
&5x^6-640320x^5-10x^3+1=0
\end{align}
\end{align}
</math><!-- don't put thousands separators under <math>! -->
</math>


with the j-invariants appearing again. These sextics are not only algebraic, they are also [[Solvable group|solvable]] in [[Nth root|radicals]] as they factor into two [[Cubic equation|cubics]] over the extension <math>\mathbb{Q}\sqrt{5}</math> (with the first factoring further into two [[Quadratic equation|quadratics]]). These algebraic approximations can be ''exactly'' expressed in terms of Dedekind eta quotients. As an example, let <math>\tau = (1+\sqrt{-163})/2</math>, then,
with the j-invariants appearing again. These sextics are not only algebraic, they are also [[Solvable group|solvable]] in [[Nth root|radicals]] as they factor into two [[Cubic equation|cubics]] over the extension <math>\mathbb{Q}\sqrt{5}</math> (with the first factoring further into two [[Quadratic equation|quadratics]]). These algebraic approximations can be ''exactly'' expressed in terms of Dedekind eta quotients. As an example, let <math>\tau = (1+\sqrt{-163})/2</math>, then,
Line 173: Line 173:


==Consecutive primes==
==Consecutive primes==
Given an odd prime ''p'', if one computes <math>k^2 \pmod{p}</math> for <math>k=0,1,\dots,(p-1)/2</math> (this is sufficient because <math>(p-k)^2\equiv k^2 \pmod{p}</math>), one gets consecutive composites, followed by consecutive primes, if and only if ''p'' is a Heegner number.<ref>http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath263.htm</ref>
Given an odd prime&nbsp;''p'', if one computes <math>k^2 \pmod{p}</math> for <math>k=0,1,\dots,(p-1)/2</math> (this is sufficient because <math>(p-k)^2\equiv k^2 \pmod{p}</math>), one gets consecutive composites, followed by consecutive primes, if and only if ''p'' is a Heegner number.<ref>http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath263.htm</ref>


For details, see "Quadratic Polynomials Producing Consecutive Distinct Primes and Class Groups of Complex Quadratic Fields" by Richard Mollin.
For details, see "Quadratic Polynomials Producing Consecutive Distinct Primes and Class Groups of Complex Quadratic Fields" by Richard Mollin.

Revision as of 09:57, 17 November 2012

In number theory, a Heegner number is a square-free positive integer d such that the imaginary quadratic field Q(d) has class number 1. Equivalently, its ring of integers has unique factorization.[1]

The determination of such numbers is a special case of the class number problem, and they underlie several striking results in number theory.

According to the Stark–Heegner theorem there are precisely nine Heegner numbers:

1, 2, 3, 7, 11, 19, 43, 67, 163.

This result was conjectured by Gauss and proven by Kurt Heegner in 1952.

Euler's prime-generating polynomial

Euler's prime-generating polynomial

which gives (distinct) primes for n = 0, ..., 39, is related to the Heegner number 163 = 4 · 41 − 1.

Rabinowitz[2] proved that

gives primes for if and only if its discriminant equals minus a Heegner number.

(Note that yields , so is maximal.) 1, 2, and 3 are not of the required form, so the Heegner numbers that work are , yielding prime generating functions of Euler's form for ; these latter numbers are called lucky numbers of Euler by F. Le Lionnais.[3]

Almost integers and Ramanujan's constant

Ramanujan's constant is the transcendental number[4] , which is an almost integer, in that it is very close to an integer:

262,537,412,640,768,743.999 999 999 999 25…[5]

This number was discovered in 1859 by the mathematician Charles Hermite.[6] In a 1975 April Fool article in Scientific American magazine,[7] "Mathematical Games" columnist Martin Gardner made the (hoax) claim that the number was in fact an integer, and that the Indian mathematical genius Srinivasa Ramanujan had predicted it—hence its name.

This coincidence is explained by complex multiplication and the q-expansion of the j-invariant.

Detail

Briefly, is an integer for d a Heegner number, and via the q-expansion.

If is a quadratic irrational, then the j-invariant is an algebraic integer of degree , the class number of and the minimal (monic integral) polynomial it satisfies is called the Hilbert class polynomial. Thus if the imaginary quadratic extension has class number 1 (so d is a Heegner number), the j-invariant is an integer.

The q-expansion of j, with its Fourier series expansion written as a Laurent series in terms of , begins as:

The coefficients asymptotically grow as , and the low order coefficients grow more slowly than , so for , j is very well approximated by its first two terms. Setting yields or equivalently, . Now , so,

Or,

where the linear term of the error is,

explaining why is within approximately the above of being an integer.

Other Heegner numbers

For the four largest Heegner numbers, the approximations one obtains[8] are as follows.

Alternatively,[9]

where the reason for the squares is due to certain Eisenstein series. For Heegner numbers , one does not obtain an almost integer; even is not noteworthy.[10] The integer j-invariants are highly factorisable, which follows from the form, and factor as,

These transcendental numbers, in addition to being closely approximated by integers, (which are simply algebraic numbers of degree 1), can also be closely approximated by algebraic numbers of degree 3,[11]

The roots of the cubics can be exactly given by quotients of the Dedekind eta function η(τ), a modular function involving a 24th root, and which explains the 24 in the approximation. In addition, they can also be closely approximated by algebraic numbers of degree 4,[12]

Note the reappearance of the integers as well as the fact that,

which, with the appropriate fractional power, are precisely the j-invariants. As well as for algebraic numbers of degree 6,

where the xs are given respectively by the appropriate root of the sextic equations,

with the j-invariants appearing again. These sextics are not only algebraic, they are also solvable in radicals as they factor into two cubics over the extension (with the first factoring further into two quadratics). These algebraic approximations can be exactly expressed in terms of Dedekind eta quotients. As an example, let , then,

where the eta quotients are the algebraic numbers given above.

Consecutive primes

Given an odd prime p, if one computes for (this is sufficient because ), one gets consecutive composites, followed by consecutive primes, if and only if p is a Heegner number.[13]

For details, see "Quadratic Polynomials Producing Consecutive Distinct Primes and Class Groups of Complex Quadratic Fields" by Richard Mollin.

Notes and references

  1. ^ Conway, John Horton (1996). The Book of Numbers. Springer. p. 224. ISBN 0-387-97993-X. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  2. ^ Rabinowitz, G. "Eindeutigkeit der Zerlegung in Primzahlfaktoren in quadratischen Zahlkörpern." Proc. Fifth Internat. Congress Math. (Cambridge) 1, 418–421, 1913.
  3. ^ Le Lionnais, F. Les nombres remarquables. Paris: Hermann, pp. 88 and 144, 1983.
  4. ^ Weisstein, Eric W. "Transcendental Number". MathWorld. gives , based on Nesterenko, Yu. V. "On Algebraic Independence of the Components of Solutions of a System of Linear Differential Equations." Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat. 38, 495–512, 1974. English translation in Math. USSR 8, 501–518, 1974.
  5. ^ Ramanujan Constant – from Wolfram MathWorld
  6. ^ Barrow, John D (2002). The Constants of Nature. London: Jonathan Cape. ISBN 0-224-06135-6.
  7. ^ Gardner, Martin (April 1975). "Mathematical Games". Scientific American. 232 (4). Scientific American, Inc: 127.
  8. ^ These can be checked by computing on a calculator, and for the linear term of the error.
  9. ^ http://groups.google.com.ph/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/3d24137c9a860893?hl=en#
  10. ^ The absolute deviation of a random real number (picked uniformly from [0,1], say) is a uniformly distributed variable on [0, 0.5], so it has absolute average deviation and median absolute deviation of 0.25, and a deviation of 0.22 is not exceptional.
  11. ^ "Pi Formulas".
  12. ^ "Extending Ramanujan's Dedekind Eta Quotients".
  13. ^ http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath263.htm

External links