User talk:Psantora: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:08, 14 May 2006

Leave a new message.

You are welcome to leave messages here. I will reply here (rather than on, say, your user page). Conversely, if I've left a message on your talk page, I'm watching it, so please reply there.Archive

Netflix and "Hacking Netflix" link

I notice you've made some contribs to the Netflix article in the past. Would you mind popping by if you have a chance and contributing any thoughts you might have on the ongoing "link to Hacking Netflix.com" discussion on the Talk page? There is a single member (Efreeti) who is dead set against this, and I'm hoping to get some more editors involved to try and enlarge the size of the consensus and put this to rest one way or the other. Thanks, David Oberst 15:09, 26 April 2006 (UTC) (a fellow Mac and Safari user).[reply]

Jesuit Ivy

Hey, I'm requesting your opnion about this vote for deletion. Seems like the initial motive for deleting it was a misguided notion of "self-styled" boosterism. Now it looks like the article will be merged with Boston College, which in my opinion is already too long. Anyway, have a look and leave your vote/comments. -136.167.93.113 02:23, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy from the Heights...

... ok not really the Heights, but Newton campus. Anyway, it seems like there are a few other lurking BC Wikipedians here, so I thought I'd make a BC user template ... yes I'm procrastining ... Check it out: Template:User bc and let me know what you think. ( Template:User BC (captialized) is already being used for those darn British Columbians) Droitet 22:32, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy

Looks like we are trampling over eachother. Take a look at my edits and see if you want to incorporated them. I'll have a look tomorrow. I should hit the sheets anyways ... Droitet 08:11, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

Could you direct me to where it says that all full dates should be linked? I'd just like to see the reasoning behind it, since I personally see none. Dan 06:19, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DATE#Dates_containing_a_month_and_a_day It is so users who have set special formatting for their dates can see the correct formatting. Paul^C/_T+ 06:26, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've been there and I still can't find where it says it has to be done that way. I'm not sure what it means by "so users who have set special formatting for their dates can see the correct formatting." That doesn't make much sense to me. Dan 06:31, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, the first sentence in the direct section that I linked to:

If a date includes both a month and a day, then the date should normally be linked to allow readers' date preferences to work.

Maybe it would make sense if you actually took the time to read some of the information at the link. Paul^C/_T+ 06:37, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Paul-

It wasn't vandalism. It's the truth. So mind your own business.

Hey Dickhead-

That's right I called you Dickhead. Mind your own business. My post is correct and has been every time I have written it. It's not vandalism just b/c you think it is.