Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady Guan: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Relisting debate
Line 21: Line 21:
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <font face="Impact">[[User:TBrandley#top|TBrandley]]</font> <sup>([[User talk:TBrandley#top|what's up]])</sup> 01:29, 9 February 2013 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <font face="Impact">[[User:TBrandley#top|TBrandley]]</font> <sup>([[User talk:TBrandley#top|what's up]])</sup> 01:29, 9 February 2013 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
<hr style="width:55%;" />
<hr style="width:55%;" />
* Indeed not notable; '''merge''' into [[Guan Yu]].--[[User:Ymblanter|Ymblanter]] ([[User talk:Ymblanter|talk]]) 09:11, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:11, 9 February 2013

Lady Guan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent notability at all apart from her father Guan Yu, even in the context of fiction. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 18:56, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Question – is this about a real person or a fictional one the article is unclear? Just wanted to know so I can delsort under People or Fictional elements. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 02:36, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Sorry, I guess I wasn't all that clear. This person was real, but the name given to her in the article (as the article noted) is fictional. And I am arguing for deletion on the basis that she was neither notable as a real person nor as portrayed in fiction. --Nlu (talk) 04:32, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 11:48, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 11:48, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:05, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:07, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley (what's up) 01:29, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]