User talk:INeverCry

Speedy Deletion nomination for Today Daily News (Toronto) Hi, I saw that you deleted my speedy deletion nomination for Today Daily News (Toronto) and wanted to make sure I did not do anything wrong. There are no sources for this article anywhere on the Internet. The only search result for this entity appears to be the Wikipedia article. Just hoping to could help me understood what I might not have noticed or realized about this article that does not make it a candidate for speedy deletion. Thanks ProliferatingJade (talk) 23:39, 21 April 2013 (UTC) Sorry I didn't speak to you about that. I must've forgotten. The paper is mentioned here in connection with a notable partner company. Perhaps the paper is defunct now? Perhaps it merged with another paper or was renamed? I also wonder if a Chinese language search would turn up more sources? In any event, this should be taken to WP:AFD rather than speedied, especially considering it's been around for such a long time. INeverCry 01:20, 22 April 2013 (UTC) Tristonia Hi INeverCry! A page I nominated for deletion and which you deleted was recreated recently. The recreation was by the same editor and did not seem to be improved in anyway. I was going to tag it for deletion again but I thought it might be better for you to take action. Thanks. Sosthenes12 (talk) 18:17, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Sosthenes12 I've deleted it again and salted it. INeverCry 23:11, 22 April 2013 (UTC) Thanks! Sosthenes12 (talk) 23:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Sosthenes12 Answer Thank you for your pleasant message. I am a french contributor and, sorry, because I like very much your country, your culture, my english is catastrophic. I use the list of russians-speaking writers to complete the french list. When I discovered an error, an oversight, I corrected or I completed; I think it is normal. Thanks and good Luck to you and your work in Wikipedia. Martien19 (talk) 23:00, 22 April 2013 (UTC) Merci, and good luck in your work as well. INeverCry 23:34, 22 April 2013 (UTC) Samizdat in the gulag Hi Inc, congrats on your making admin. Well deserved! Over at Anna Akhmatova, Urfinze is insistent that her works could never have been known or circulated in the gulags as they were effectively sealed. What do you think to this? Most of Urfinze's edits seem to me to have a strongly POV whiff. Best wishes Span (talk) 23:27, 22 April 2013 (UTC) Thanks. You've provided the source, which is all that matters. If this user does this again, you or I can warn them, and if it continues, they can be blocked for edit warring (again). INeverCry 01:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC) David Hi there. Im not sure why you deleted my page... it says A7: Summer U (A7: No explanation of significance (real person/animal/organization/web content/organized event) but its clearly says that it is an event organized by the EUJS... so im not sure why was it deleted. Pls advise :) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Summer_U&action=edit&redlink=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by David.nahum.wiki (talk • contribs) 17:15, 23 April 2013 (UTC) I've re-deleted it. An event that involves only 500 people doesn't sound notable enough for a stand-alone article. You would have to show coverage of the event in WP:RS. INeverCry 17:25, 23 April 2013 (UTC) O.k I will add WP:RS. I think that an annual 500 people event from around Europe, that also have a national-religious significance and being sponsored by the EU is actually notable and should have a page. Especially that it is an event that people would google for and want more details. Moreover the Wikipedia Page support actually encourage people to participate and it would help them decide and increase the amount. I'm gonna reload it. pls let it be.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by David.nahum.wiki (talk • contribs) 21:51, 23 April 2013 (UTC) I disagree. A tiny event like this doesn't meet WP:N. As for you re-creating it, I already salted the title earlier, so you're not going to be able to so. If you re-create it under a different title, it'll just end up being deleted again. The EUJS itself is notable, but every little event they sponsor isn't. Also, Wikipedia isn't for promoting events or getting publicity for them. INeverCry 22:00, 23 April 2013 (UTC) Deletion of Moravia IT's Page Dear INeverCry, I see you deleted the page of Moravia IT at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moravia_IT. I believe this is because of the alleged infringement of copyright of the logo, which I uploaded. The company (which I work for) has undergone a rebranding in 2012 and uses a new logo now. It may be may mistake in incorrectly marking the property of this logo when updating the page, which I wanted to stay current. Can you please restore the page and I will upload the current logo again (it is normally available at www.moravia.com). I think it is a pity if a valid page should be deleted simply because the entity's current logo is not properly tagged. Or if there was another reason (also to delete the whole page rather than just the image/logo), please let me know. Thank you! Vikivik — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vikivik (talk • contribs) 20:02, 23 April 2013 (UTC) The article was deleted for using copyvio text/material. The admin who tagged it for deletion was User:DGG. You should contact him for clarification. INeverCry 21:47, 23 April 2013 (UTC) Rosemont Copper Hello INeveryCry, I noticed that you deleted the Rosemont Copper page. Why was this? Thank you. Jamesbeatman (talk) 05:33, 24 April 2013 (UTC) This was deleted per WP:CSD#G11. The majority of this article sounds like it was written by an advocate to show what a great and conscientious company Rosemont Copper is, and to tell people about all the great things they're going to do. This isn't acceptable. A Wikipedia article about a company should be neutral and stick to straight facts about company history, purpose, statistics, finances, location, etc. Please refer to Wikipedia:Companies, corporations and economic information for basic guidelines. INeverCry 06:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC) Flash Crash article I understand why it was deleted, but the article could develop on the explanation of the actual Flash Crash, not the tweets. —SPESH531Other 22:25, 24 April 2013 (UTC) What article are you referring to? INeverCry 00:25, 25 April 2013 (UTC) AP Tweet Flash Crash of 2013, although it should be renamed as 2013 Flash Crash.—SPESH531Other 01:11, 25 April 2013 (UTC) That was deleted for duplicating Associated Press false tweet. INeverCry 01:46, 25 April 2013 (UTC) Reopen and relist RM? Hi, thanks for RM close/move but is there a procedure to reopen and relist? Despite 6 supports and the overwhelming conclusion of the WP:TENNISNAMES RfC in July 2012 it seems that Fyunck and Wolbo are going to insist on a "tennis name" being added in the article and edit counter WP:BRD to keep it there. I would expect that if the RM was reopened/relisted and ran for another week the number of supports would likely increase. Is that doable? If not, what's the alternative? Best wishes. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:20, 25 April 2013 (UTC)