Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Dresden Triptych/archive1: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 14:48, 15 July 2013

Dresden Triptych

Featured article candidates/Dresden Triptych/archive1

Nominator(s): Ceoil, Victoria

Very small but very beauitful and innovative 1437 triptych altarpiece, which had a significant influence on following generations of Netherlandish painters, but which is now sadly in poor condition. Ceoil (talk) 18:04, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Crisco 1492

Note that this is well outside my general subject area, so my questions may be quite basic.

Dresden Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister - Per WP:SEAOFBLUE, splitting these links would be nice.

ALC IXH XAN - What language is this, if a language and not a code?

Virgin Mary - You have "Marian" earlier, which could be construed as the first mention. Or you could link to a general article on Marian art with the first "Marian"

the Christ child - Since we're linking Mary, may as well link Christ/Christ child

Why the link to miniature (illuminated manuscript)? I don't think a triptych would fall under "manuscript"

we know that Philip the Good owned at least one. - One of this triptych, or a miniature for personal devotion?

a typical 14th-century - if van Eyck painted in the 15th century, why would he use a format common to the preceding century?

Child Christ - Isn't Christ Child more common?

on northern artists of 12th and 13th century Italian artists - Can't parse this

– unlike Robert Campin who favoured domestic settings – - value of the comparison not yet clear

HIC EST ARCHANGELUS PRINCEPS MILITAE ANGELORUM CUIUS HONOR PRAESTAT BENEFICIA POPULORUM ET ORATARIO PERDUCIT AD REGNA COELORUM. HIC ANGELUS MICHAEL DEI NUNTIUS DE ANIMABUS JUSTIS. GRATIA DEI ILLE VICTOR IN COELIS RESEDIT. A PACIBUS. - No translation?

cn tag added

VIRGO PRUDENS ANELAVIT, GRANUM SIBI RESERVAVIT, VENTILANDO PALEAM. DISIPLINUS EST IMBUTA PUELLA COELESTIBUS, NUDA NUDUM EST SECUTA CHRISTUM PASSIBUS, DUM MUNDANIS EST EXUTA ECT - No translation?

All images showing the frame should be cropped; the frame is a 3D object and thus scans/photographs would not fall under PD-Art. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:59, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think the frames are crucial to the form and the inscriptions. Will let someone else who knows more about this figure it out, but would like to keep them. Victoria (talk) 14:48, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's it for today, another three paragraphs for tomorrow. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:58, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 :VIRGO PRUDENS ANELAVIT, GRANUM SIBI RESERVAVIT, VENTILANDO PALEAM. DISIPLINUS EST IMBUTA PUELLA COELESTIBUS, NUDA NUDUM EST SECUTA CHRISTUM PASSIBUS, DUM MUNDANIS EST EXUTA ECT - No translation?
 :All images showing the frame should be cropped; the frame is a 3D object and thus scans/photographs would not fall under PD-Art.&nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 13:59, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
+::I think the frames are crucial to the form and the inscriptions. Will let someone else who knows more about this figure it out, but would like to keep them. [[User:Victoriaearle|Victoria]] ([[User talk:Victoriaearle|talk]]) 14:48, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 :That's it for today, another three paragraphs for tomorrow.&nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 13:58, 15 July 2013 (UTC)