Jump to content

Talk:Encomium Emmae Reginae: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m moved Talk:Encomium Emmae to Talk:Encomium Emmae Reginae: full title more common
updates
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WPMA|class=Stub|importance=Low}}
{{WPMA|class=Start|importance=Low}}


Aelfgifu was the name of Cnut's mistress, who bore him Swein. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/131.111.200.200|131.111.200.200]] ([[User talk:131.111.200.200|talk]]) 15:31, 20 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Aelfgifu was the name of Cnut's mistress, who bore him Swein. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/131.111.200.200|131.111.200.200]] ([[User talk:131.111.200.200|talk]]) 15:31, 20 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 21:31, 2 December 2013

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconMiddle Ages Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aelfgifu was the name of Cnut's mistress, who bore him Swein. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.200.200 (talk) 15:31, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but it was also the regnal name of Emma. Despite that, I don't disagree with your removal, I think the point was a bit of a tangent, not really called for in such a short article. Haukur 16:27, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Was she not the patron of this work? Shouldn't that be mentioned explicitly? Srnec 16:26, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that she commissioned the work, yes. By all means expand the article :) Haukur 16:36, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]