Talk:Dark money: Difference between revisions
→Recent content deletions: new section |
Roccodrift (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{{ping|Roccodrift}} deleted some unsourced content, but also deleted some sourced content that I would consider relevant to the article. I invite this editor to discuss these edits here so we can reach consensus. - [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 20:07, 9 December 2013 (UTC) |
{{ping|Roccodrift}} deleted some unsourced content, but also deleted some sourced content that I would consider relevant to the article. I invite this editor to discuss these edits here so we can reach consensus. - [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 20:07, 9 December 2013 (UTC) |
||
:I'm not just removing unsourced content, I'm also removing OR and synthesis. I'm just getting started, there's a lot left to go. [[User:Roccodrift|Roccodrift]] ([[User talk:Roccodrift|talk]]) 20:11, 9 December 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:11, 9 December 2013
Politics Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
United States Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
February 2013
-Orphan status noted. Added link on page money trail Pbmaise (talk) 11:44, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
NPOV & OR ??
As it stands, the article has a lot of examples, cited and uncited. And we have the "Theory" section. But, more importantly, it lends to NPOV by its' very title. Dark (as in The Dark Side sounds so ominous. Once it stands as an independent article (e.g., with WP legitimacy/notability), it is getting linked as if it gives legitimacy to those sources which use the term. – S. Rich (talk) 19:54, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Recent content deletions
@Roccodrift: deleted some unsourced content, but also deleted some sourced content that I would consider relevant to the article. I invite this editor to discuss these edits here so we can reach consensus. - MrX 20:07, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not just removing unsourced content, I'm also removing OR and synthesis. I'm just getting started, there's a lot left to go. Roccodrift (talk) 20:11, 9 December 2013 (UTC)