Jump to content

Unitatis redintegratio: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Monkbot (talk | contribs)
Bots
3,694,069 edits
→Separated brethren: This edit was really an edited and expanded revert of content from a previous page, see talk page
Line 46: Line 46:
{{cite book|location=New York|publisher=Costello|series=Vatican collection|edition=New rev. 2nd|editor-last=Flannery|editor-first=Austin|editor-link=Austin Flannery|title=Vatican Council II: the conciliar and postconciliar documents|volume=1|year=1996|isbn=9780918344397|pages=419, 421}}
{{cite book|location=New York|publisher=Costello|series=Vatican collection|edition=New rev. 2nd|editor-last=Flannery|editor-first=Austin|editor-link=Austin Flannery|title=Vatican Council II: the conciliar and postconciliar documents|volume=1|year=1996|isbn=9780918344397|pages=419, 421}}
</ref> J. M. R. Tillard goes into detail, in ''[[New Catholic Encyclopedia]]'', about "the development of a carefully nuanced vocabulary, consistent with Vatican II Ecclesiology," which evolved from "the idea of membership in favor of that of incorporation" and has its categorization found in the dogmatic constitution ''{{lang|la|[[Lumen Gentium]]}}'' (LG) which Tillard describes:
</ref> J. M. R. Tillard goes into detail, in ''[[New Catholic Encyclopedia]]'', about "the development of a carefully nuanced vocabulary, consistent with Vatican II Ecclesiology," which evolved from "the idea of membership in favor of that of incorporation" and has its categorization found in the dogmatic constitution ''{{lang|la|[[Lumen Gentium]]}}'' (LG) which Tillard describes:
*Catholics are defined as {{" '}}being incorporated' (''{{lang|la|incorporatio}}''), qualifying the term with the adverb 'fully' (''{{lang|la|plene}}'') and emphasizing that full incorporation requires the presence of the [[Holy Spirit (Christianity)|Holy Spirit]]."{{efn|{{abbr|LG|Lumen Gentium}} 14.2 quoted in Tillard.<ref name="Tillard2003" />}}
*Catholics are defined as {{" '}}being incorporated' (''{{lang|la|incorporatio}}''), qualifying the term with the adverb 'fully' (''{{lang|la|plene}}'') and emphasizing that full incorporation requires the presence of the [[Holy Spirit (Christianity)|Holy Spirit]]."{{efn|{{abbr|LG|Lumen Gentium}} 14.2 quoted by Tillard.<ref name="Tillard2003" />}}
*Non-Catholics and [[catechumen]]s are defined as {{" '}}being linked' (''{{lang|la|conjunctio}}'') to the Church, again carefully stressing the role of the Holy Spirit in each case."{{efn|{{abbr|LG|Lumen Gentium}} 14.3; 15.2 quoted in Tillard.<ref name="Tillard2003" />}}
*Non-Catholics and [[catechumen]]s are defined as {{" '}}being linked' (''{{lang|la|conjunctio}}'') to the Church, again carefully stressing the role of the Holy Spirit in each case."{{efn|{{abbr|LG|Lumen Gentium}} 14.3; 15.2 quoted by Tillard.<ref name="Tillard2003" />}}
*Non-Christians are defined as {{" '}}being related' (''{{lang|la|ordinantur}}''), a term that suggests a dynamic relationship, an orientation toward the Church."{{efn|{{abbr|LG|Lumen Gentium}} 16 quoted in Tillard.<ref name="Tillard2003" />}}
*Non-Christians are defined as {{" '}}being related' (''{{lang|la|ordinantur}}''), a term that suggests a dynamic relationship, an orientation toward the Church."{{efn|{{abbr|LG|Lumen Gentium}} 16 quoted by Tillard.<ref name="Tillard2003" />}}
"Every shade of difference in meaning among these terms is important," emphasizes Tillard. "But the terms acquire their full force only in the light of the most authoritative commentaries on them," {{abbr|UR|Unitatis Redintegratio}} and ''[[Nostra Aetate]]'' (NA). "Then, supposing the nuances indicated, the richness of such expressions as the following becomes clear: 'Churches and [[Ecclesial Community|ecclesial communities]]';{{efn|{{abbr|UR|Unitatis Redintegratio}} 3.3 quoted in Tillard; cf. {{abbr|LG|Lumen Gentium}} 15.1 cited in Tillard.<ref name="Tillard2003" />}} 'separated brethren';{{efn|brothers divided; {{abbr|UR|Unitatis Redintegratio}} 3.4 quoted in Tillard.<ref name="Tillard2003" />}} 'separated Churches and ecclesial communities';{{efn|{{abbr|UR|Unitatis Redintegratio}} 3.4 quoted in Tillard.<ref name="Tillard2003" />}} '[[full communion]]'—'imperfect communion'."<ref name="Tillard2003">
"Every shade of difference in meaning among these terms is important," emphasizes Tillard. "But the terms acquire their full force only in the light of the most authoritative commentaries on them," {{abbr|UR|Unitatis Redintegratio}} and ''[[Nostra Aetate]]'' (NA). "Then, supposing the nuances indicated, the richness of such expressions as the following becomes clear: 'Churches and [[Ecclesial Community|ecclesial communities]]';{{efn|{{abbr|UR|Unitatis Redintegratio}} 3.3 quoted by Tillard; cf. {{abbr|LG|Lumen Gentium}} 15.1 cited in Tillard.<ref name="Tillard2003" />}} 'separated brethren';{{efn|brothers divided; {{abbr|UR|Unitatis Redintegratio}} 3.4 quoted by Tillard.<ref name="Tillard2003" />}} 'separated Churches and ecclesial communities';{{efn|{{abbr|UR|Unitatis Redintegratio}} 3.4 quoted by Tillard.<ref name="Tillard2003" />}} '[[full communion]]'—'imperfect communion'."<ref name="Tillard2003">
{{cite encyclopedia|location=Detroit|publisher=Gale|encyclopedia=New Catholic Encyclopedia|edition=2nd|year=2003|volume=7|isbn=0-7876-4011-5|editor-last=Carson|editor-first=Thomas|last=Tillard|first=J. M. R.|title=Incorporation into the Church (Membership)|pages=380&ndash;383|url=http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CCX3407705611&v=2.1&u=clevnet_cpl&it=r&p=GVRL&sw=w&asid=e3a541c47313d77ae65372d4d32906ef|accessdate=2014-01-24|via=Gale Virtual Reference Library}}
{{cite encyclopedia|location=Detroit|publisher=Gale|encyclopedia=New Catholic Encyclopedia|edition=2nd|year=2003|volume=7|isbn=0-7876-4011-5|editor-last=Carson|editor-first=Thomas|last=Tillard|first=J. M. R.|title=Incorporation into the Church (Membership)|pages=380&ndash;383|url=http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CCX3407705611&v=2.1&u=clevnet_cpl&it=r&p=GVRL&sw=w&asid=e3a541c47313d77ae65372d4d32906ef|accessdate=2014-01-24|via=Gale Virtual Reference Library}}
</ref>{{efn|{{abbr|UR|Unitatis Redintegratio}} 3.1 quoted in Tillard.<ref name="Tillard2003" />}}
</ref>{{efn|{{abbr|UR|Unitatis Redintegratio}} 3.1 quoted by Tillard.<ref name="Tillard2003" />}}


"But thanks to its ecclesiology," wrote Tillard, "Vatican II was able to affirm at the same time that Churches or ecclesial communities separated from the Catholic Church are part of the single Church, and that nevertheless incorporation in Christ and His Church possesses within the Catholic Church the fullness that it does not have elsewhere."<ref name="Tillard2003" />
"But thanks to its ecclesiology," wrote Tillard, "Vatican II was able to affirm at the same time that Churches or ecclesial communities separated from the Catholic Church are part of the single Church, and that nevertheless incorporation in Christ and His Church possesses within the Catholic Church the fullness that it does not have elsewhere."<ref name="Tillard2003" />
Line 60: Line 60:
"All Christians who are baptized and believe in Christ but are not professed Catholics" are separated brethren, according to John Hardon in ''Modern Catholic Dictionary''. "More commonly the term is applied to Protestants."<ref name="Hardon2013">
"All Christians who are baptized and believe in Christ but are not professed Catholics" are separated brethren, according to John Hardon in ''Modern Catholic Dictionary''. "More commonly the term is applied to Protestants."<ref name="Hardon2013">
{{cite encyclopedia|location=New York|publisher=Image|encyclopedia=Catholic dictionary: an abridged and updated edition of Modern Catholic dictionary|year=2013|isbn=9780307886347|last=Hardon|first=John A|authorlink=John Hardon|title=Separated brethren|page=468|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=cQPgxUewa_IC&pg=PA467|accessdate=2014-01-24}}
{{cite encyclopedia|location=New York|publisher=Image|encyclopedia=Catholic dictionary: an abridged and updated edition of Modern Catholic dictionary|year=2013|isbn=9780307886347|last=Hardon|first=John A|authorlink=John Hardon|title=Separated brethren|page=468|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=cQPgxUewa_IC&pg=PA467|accessdate=2014-01-24}}
</ref> Likewise, "separated brethren" according to [[Catholic Answers]], in ''This Rock'', "refers to those who, though separated from full communion with the Catholic Church, have been justified through baptism and are thus brethren in Christ."<ref name="ThisRock2002">
⚫
</ref>
{{cite journal|location=San Diego, CA|publisher=Catholic Answers|journal=This rock: the magazine of Catholic apologetics and evangelization|issn=1049-4561|volume=13|issue=8|date=Oct., 2002|author=Catholic Answers Staff|title=Quick Questions|url=http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/2002/0210qq.asp|accessdate=2014-01-25|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20040912133545/http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/2002/0210qq.asp|archivedate=2004-09-12|deadurl=yes|via=Catholic.com}}
</ref> {{abbr|UR|Unitatis Redintegratio}} "teaches that 'all who have been justified by faith in baptism are members of Christ's body, and have a right to be called Christian, and so are correctly accepted as brothers by the children of the Catholic Church'."<ref name="ThisRock2002" /><ref name="UR">
{{cite book|location=Vatican City|publisher=
|author=Catholic Church. Second Vatican Council
|title=Unitatis Redintegratio|type=|date=1964-11-21|url=http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decree_19641121_unitatis-redintegratio_en.html}}
</ref><ref name="ED1993" />{{rp|at=n.99}} J. A. Jungmann and K. Stasiak wrote, in ''New Catholic Encyclopedia'', that "the Second Vatican Council's call for a greater spirit of ecumenism among churches and ecclesial communities reflects the understanding that Baptism is the effecting and the sign of the fundamental unity of all Christians."<ref name="Jungmann2003">
{{cite encyclopedia|location=Detroit|publisher=Gale|encyclopedia=New Catholic Encyclopedia|edition=2nd|year=2003|volume=2|isbn=0-7876-4006-9|editor-last=Carson|editor-first=Thomas|last1=Jungmann|first1=J. A|last2=Stasiak|first2=K|title=Baptism, Sacrament of|pages=66&ndash;67|url=http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CCX3407701082&v=2.1&u=clevnet_cpl&it=r&p=GVRL&sw=w&asid=522887e9e8368cee50dcbdadd87b9c0d|accessdate=2014-01-24|via=Gale Virtual Reference Library}}
</ref>{{efn|According to the [[1983 Code of Canon Law|1983 ''Code of Canon Law'']] (1983{{nbsp}}CIC), baptism "is validly conferred only by a washing of true water with the proper form of words."<ref name="CIC1983">
{{cite encyclopedia|location=Washington, DC|publisher=Canon Law Society of America|encyclopedia=Code of canon law: new English translation|version=IntraText|year=1999|origyear=©1998|isbn=0-943616-79-4|author=Catholic Church|url=http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/_INDEX.HTM|via=Vatican.va}}
</ref>{{rp|at=[http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/__P2U.HTM can.849]}}
The {{abbr|1983{{nbsp}}CIC|1983 Code of Canon Law}} states that "in a case of necessity any person with the right intention, confers baptism licitly."<ref name="CIC1983" />{{rp|at=can.861§2}}<ref name="ED1993" />{{rp|at=n.95.a}}
"Those baptized in a non-Catholic ecclesial community must not be baptized conditionally unless, after an examination of the matter and the form of the words used in the conferral of baptism and a consideration of the intention of the baptized adult and the minister of the baptism, a serious reason exists to doubt the validity of the baptism."<ref name="CIC1983" />{{rp|at=can.869§2}}
See {{cite encyclopedia|encyclopedia={{abbr|''CCC''|Catechism of the Catholic Church}}|at=[http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P3O.HTM n. 1278]|quote=The essential rite of Baptism consists in immersing the candidate in water or pouring water on his head, while pronouncing the invocation of the Most Holy Trinity: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.}}<ref name="CCC2003" /> "The Catholic Church recognizes as valid baptisms performed by other churches and ecclesial communities if these two conditions are met, and if there is no serious reason to question either the intention of the minister and the free acceptance of Baptism by the one baptized."<ref name="Jungmann2003" /><ref name="ED1993">
{{cite book|via=Vatican.va|author=Catholic Church. Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity|title=Directory for the application of principles and norms on ecumenism|date=1993-03-25|url=http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/general-docs/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_19930325_directory_en.html|accessdate=2014-01-23}}
</ref>{{rp|at=nn.93, 95.a&ndash;95.c}}


}}

"Because Mormonism is [[polytheistic]] and rejects the Trinity,"{{efn|According to Catholic Answers, in ''This Rock'', "Mormonism is essentially polytheistic."<ref name="ThisRock1990">
{{cite journal|location=San Diego, CA|publisher=[[Catholic Answers]]|journal=This rock: the magazine of Catholic apologetics and evangelization|issn=1049-4561|volume=1|issue=2|date=Feb., 1990|author=Catholic Answers Staff|title=Quick Questions|url=http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/1990/9002qq.asp|accessdate=2014-01-25|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20050208020704/http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/1990/9002qq.asp|archivedate=2005-02-08|deadurl=yes|via=Catholic.com}}
</ref> Catholic Answers quoted from ''[[Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith (book)|Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith]]'', in which the founder of the [[Latter Day Saint movement]], [[Joseph Smith, Jr.]], affirmed: "I have always declared God to be a distinct personage, Jesus Christ a separate and distinct personage from God the Father, and the Holy Ghost was a distinct personage and a Spirit: and these three constitute three distinct personages and three Gods."<ref name="ThisRock1990" /><ref>
{{cite book|location=[Salt Lake City]|publisher=Deseret news Press|last=Smith|first=Joseph, Jr.|authorlink=Joseph Smith|editor-last=Smith|editor-first=Joseph Fielding|editor-link=Joseph Fielding Smith|title=Teachings of the prophet Joseph Smith|page=370|year=1938|lccn=38008207|url=http://www.boap.org/LDS/Joseph-Smith/Teachings/T6.html|accessdate=2014-01-25|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20050213153544/http://www.boap.org/LDS/Joseph-Smith/Teachings/T6.html|archivedate=2005-02-13|deadurl=no|via=Book of Abraham Project}}
</ref> The theologies of [[God in Christianity]] and [[God in Mormonism]] are different.<ref>
{{cite journal|publisher=Cambridge University Press|journal=Church History|issn=0009-6407|volume=9|issue=2|date=Jun., 1940|pages=157&ndash;169|last=Arbaugh|first=George B.|title=Evolution of Mormon doctrine|jstor=3160352}}
⚫
</ref><ref>
{{cite journal|publisher=Cambridge University Press|journal=Church History|issn=0009-6407|volume=32|issue=3|date=Sep., 1996|pages=357&ndash;370|last=Howsepian|first=A. A.|title=Are Mormons theists?|jstor=20019828}}
</ref><ref>
{{cite journal|publisher=Cambridge University Press|journal=Religious Studies|issn=0034-4125|volume=33|issue=3|date=Sep., 1997|pages=315&ndash;326|last=Ostler|first=Blake T.|title=Worshipworthiness and the Mormon concept of God|jstor=20008108}}
</ref><ref>
{{cite journal|publisher=Society for the Scientific Study of Religion|journal=Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion|issn=0021-8294|volume=23|issue=4|date=Dec., 1984|pages=396&ndash;411|last1=Heeren|first1=John|last2=Lindsey|first2=Donald B.|last3=Mason|first3=Marylee|title=The Mormon concept of Mother in Heaven: a sociological account of its origins and development|jstor=1385727}}
</ref> Also see [[Richard Abanes]] in ''Inside today's Mormonism''.<ref>
{{cite book|location=Eugene, OR|publisher=Harvest House Publishers|last=Abanes|first=Richard|authorlink=Richard Abanes|title=Inside today's Mormonism|year=2007|isbn=9780736919685|chapter=One God versus many gods|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=SuCrKAc6i6kC&pg=PT107}}
</ref> Pope John Paul II said, "The Christian doctrine on the Trinity, confirmed by the Councils, explicitly rejects any form of '[[tritheism]]' or 'polytheism'."<ref>
{{cite book|via=Vatican.va|author=Pope John Paul II|title=General audience|date=1999-05-05|at=n. 3|url=http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/audiences/1999/documents/hf_jp-ii_aud_05051999_en.html|accessdate=2014-01-25|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20010410170959/http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/audiences/1999/documents/hf_jp-ii_aud_05051999_en.html|archivedate=2001-04-10|deadurl=no}}
</ref> See {{cite encyclopedia|encyclopedia={{abbr|''CCC''|Catechism of the Catholic Church}}|at=[http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p3s2c1a1.htm n. 2112]|quote=The first commandment condemns polytheism.}}<ref name="CCC2003">
{{cite book|location=Vatican City|publisher=Libreria Editrice Vaticana|author=Catholic Church|title=Catechism of the Catholic Church|url=http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/_INDEX.HTM|year=2003|origyear=©1993|version=IntraText|oclc=68115621|accessdate=2014-01-08|via=Vatican.va}}
</ref>}} Catholic Answers points out that, "Mormon baptism is not valid,{{efn|Pope John Paul II, as legislator, approved the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith's 2001 decision.<ref name="CDF2001">
{{cite book|via=Vatican.va|author1=Catholic Church. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith|authorlink1=Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith|last2=Ratzinger|first2=Joseph|authorlink2=Pope Benedict XVI|title=Response to a "dubium" on the validity of baptism conferred by "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints", called "Mormons"|date=2001-06-05|url=http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20010605_battesimo_mormoni_en.html|accessdate=2014-01-25|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20011223093427/http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20010605_battesimo_mormoni_en.html|archivedate=2001-12-23|deadurl=no}}
</ref> Luis Ladaria explained, in ''[[L'Osservatore Romano]]'', the reasons for deciding that "it is not Christian Baptism" are that a "divergence on Trinity and baptism invalidates the intention of the Mormon minister of baptism and of the one to be baptized."<ref name="Ladaria2001">
{{cite news|location=Vatican City|newspaper=L'Osservatore Romano|edition=Weekly|language=English|issn=1563-6178|date=2001-08-01|page=4|last=Ladaria|first=Luis|title=The question of the validity of baptism conferred in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints|url=http://www.ewtn.com/library/theology/mormbap1.htm|accessdate=2014-01-29|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20010903003251/http://www.ewtn.com/library/Theology/MORMBAP1.HTM|archivedate=2001-09-03|deadurl=no|via=Eternal Word Television Network}}
</ref> Contrast with Alonzo Gaskill in ''[[FARMS Review of Books]]''.<ref>
{{cite journal|location=Provo, UT|publisher=Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies|journal=FARMS review of books|issn=1099-9450|volume=13|issue=2|year=2001|last=Gaskill|first=Alonzo|title=Maximus Nothus Decretum: a look at the recent Catholic declaration regarding Latter-day Saint Baptisms|url=http://publications.maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/fullscreen/?pub=1454&index=14|accessdate=2014-01-29|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6Mzk88a0Q|archivedate=2014-01-29|deadurl=no}}
</ref>}} and Mormons are not considered separated brethren."<ref name="ThisRock2002" /><ref name="Navarrete2001">
{{cite news|location=Vatican City|newspaper=L'Osservatore Romano|edition=Weekly|language=English|issn=1563-6178|date=2001-08-01|page=5|last=Navarrete|first=Urbano|authorlink=Urbano Navarrete Cortés|title=Response of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith about the validity of baptism conferred in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints|url=http://www.doctrinafidei.va/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20010605_battesimo_mormoni-navarrete_en.html|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20140130185632/http://www.doctrinafidei.va/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20010605_battesimo_mormoni-navarrete_en.html|archivedate=2014-01-30|deadurl=no|via=Vatican.va}}
</ref> [[Cardinal (Catholicism)|Cardinal]] [[Urbano Navarrete Cortés]] clarified, in ''L'Osservatore Romano'', "that in all of the effects of the pastoral, administrative and juridical practices of the Church the Mormons are not to be considered as belonging to an 'ecclesial community not in full communion with the Catholic Church', but simply as non-baptized."<ref name="Navarrete2001" /> Baptism conferred by [[The Christian Community]], founded by [[Rudolf Steiner]];<ref name="CDF1991">
{{cite book|via=Vatican.va|author1=Catholic Church. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith|authorlink1=Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith|last2=|first2=|authorlink2=|title=Notification regarding the validity of the baptism conferred by the "Christian Community"
or "Die Christengemeinschaft" of Rudolf Steiner|date=1991-03-09|url=http://www.doctrinafidei.va/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19910309_bapt-christian-community_en.html|accessdate=2014-01-25|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20140130021734/http://www.doctrinafidei.va/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19910309_bapt-christian-community_en.html|archivedate=2014-01-30|deadurl=no}}
</ref> [[The New Church]], founded by [[Emmanuel Swedenborg]];<ref name="CDF1992">
{{cite book|via=Vatican.va|author1=Catholic Church. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith|authorlink1=Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith|last2=|first2=|authorlink2=|title=Notification on the validity of the baptism conferred in "The New Church"|date=1992-11-20|url=http://www.doctrinafidei.va/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19921120_bapt-new-church_en.html|accessdate=2014-01-25|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20140130021421/http://www.doctrinafidei.va/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19921120_bapt-new-church_en.html|archivedate=2014-01-30|deadurl=no}}
</ref> conferred with the formula "I baptize you in the name of the Creator, and of the Redeemer, and of the Sanctifier";<ref name="CDF2008">
{{cite book|via=Vatican.va|author1=Catholic Church. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith|authorlink1=Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith|last2=|first2=|authorlink2=|title=Responses to Questions Proposed on the Validity of Baptism|date=2008-02-01|url=http://www.doctrinafidei.va/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20080201_validity-baptism_en.html|accessdate=2014-01-25|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20120320040012/http://www.doctrinafidei.va/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20080201_validity-baptism_en.html|archivedate=2012-03-20|deadurl=no}}
</ref> or, conferred with the formula "I baptize you in the name of the Creator, and of the Liberator, and of the Sustainer" are also deemed not valid.<ref name="CDF2008" />


"Separated brethren" is a term sometimes used by the [[Roman Catholic Church]] and its clergy and members to refer to [[baptism|baptized]] members of other [[Christian]] traditions.<ref name="VaticanII">{{cite journal|url=http://www.christianodyssey.com/history/vatican2.htm | work=Christian Odyssey |title=Church History Corner: Vatican II and the Future of Church Unity |author=Kroll, Paul|pages=18–19|volume=3|issue=5|date=October–November 2007 | location=Glendora, CA| publisher=[[Worldwide Church of God]]|accessdate=2010-06-21|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20120308145155/http://www.gci.org/history/vatican
"Separated brethren" is a term sometimes used by the [[Roman Catholic Church]] and its clergy and members to refer to [[baptism|baptized]] members of other [[Christian]] traditions.<ref name="VaticanII">{{cite journal|url=http://www.christianodyssey.com/history/vatican2.htm | work=Christian Odyssey |title=Church History Corner: Vatican II and the Future of Church Unity |author=Kroll, Paul|pages=18–19|volume=3|issue=5|date=October–November 2007 | location=Glendora, CA| publisher=[[Worldwide Church of God]]|accessdate=2010-06-21|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20120308145155/http://www.gci.org/history/vatican

Revision as of 06:01, 31 January 2014

Unitatis Redintegratio is the Second Vatican Council's Decree on Ecumenism. It was passed by a vote of 2,137 to 11 of the bishops assembled and was promulgated by Pope Paul VI on 21 November 1964. The title in Latin means "Restoration of Unity" and is from the first line of the decree, as is customary with major Catholic documents (see incipit).

Contents

The numbers given correspond to the section numbers within the text.

  1. Introduction (1)
  2. Catholic Principles on Ecumenism (2-4)
  3. The Practice of Ecumenism (5-12)
  4. Churches and Ecclesial Communities Separated from the Roman Apostolic See (13-24)
    1. The Special Consideration of the Eastern Churches (14-18)
    2. Separated Churches and Ecclesial Communities in the West (19-24)

Policy on the Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox

Unitatis Redintegratio calls for the reunion of Christendom and so it is not terribly different from previous calls for unity by Pope Leo XIII in the 1894 encyclical Praeclara Gratulationis Publicae. However, the document articulates a different kind of ecclesiology than Praeclara, focusing on the unity of the people of God and on separate Christian brethren instead of a classical call for schismatics to return to the fold under the unity of the Vicar of Christ.

Reformation communities

The document acknowledges that there are serious problems facing prospects of reunion with Reformation communities that make no attempt to claim apostolic succession such as the Anglican communion does. Ecclesial communities that adhere to calvinism are a particular case because they often have important doctrinal differences on key issues such as ecclesiology, liturgy and mariology. Other communities have insoluble doctrinal differences with Catholic Christianity because their theology of the Holy Trinity is manifestly incompatible with the doctrine of the council of Nicea in the early Church. That these serious problems are a barrier to salvation is clarified in the 2004 Vatican document, "The Decree on Ecumenism, Read Anew after Forty Years".

Separated brethren

The concept and wording was published as late as 1793, in a discourse which examined two papal briefs to the Bishop of Chiusi-Pienza.[1] Frank Flinn wrote, in Encyclopedia of Catholicism, that in 1959 Pope John XXIII "addressed Protestants as separated brethren," in Ad Petri Cathedram (APC), which Flinn saw as "an important step toward recognizing Protestants as legitimate partners in a future dialogue."[2][a] But Pope Leo XIII "was the first to speak of 'separated brothers'" according to John Norman Davidson Kelly's A Dictionary of Popes.[4] Edward Farrugia, in Gregorianum, describes the development from Pope Leo XIII's Orientalium Dignitas (OD) to Orientalium Ecclesiarum (OE) to Unitatis Redintegratio (UR). "Yet if OE builds on OD, differences remain. Whereas OD" 186 "speaks of 'dissident bretheren' (fratres dissidentes), OE 28 speaks of 'separated bretheren' (fratres seiunctos), although it does not go as far as UR 14, where there is an inchoative use of the language of 'sister Churches' (inter Ecclesia locales, ut inter sorores)."[5][6][7] Farrugia noted Austin Flannery's translations in Vatican Council II, "OE 29 speaks of the 'separated Churches' and OE 25 of 'any separated Eastern Christians', and OE 29 of 'Eastern separated brethren'."[5][8] J. M. R. Tillard goes into detail, in New Catholic Encyclopedia, about "the development of a carefully nuanced vocabulary, consistent with Vatican II Ecclesiology," which evolved from "the idea of membership in favor of that of incorporation" and has its categorization found in the dogmatic constitution Lumen Gentium (LG) which Tillard describes:

  • Catholics are defined as "'being incorporated' (incorporatio), qualifying the term with the adverb 'fully' (plene) and emphasizing that full incorporation requires the presence of the Holy Spirit."[b]
  • Non-Catholics and catechumens are defined as "'being linked' (conjunctio) to the Church, again carefully stressing the role of the Holy Spirit in each case."[c]
  • Non-Christians are defined as "'being related' (ordinantur), a term that suggests a dynamic relationship, an orientation toward the Church."[d]

"Every shade of difference in meaning among these terms is important," emphasizes Tillard. "But the terms acquire their full force only in the light of the most authoritative commentaries on them," UR and Nostra Aetate (NA). "Then, supposing the nuances indicated, the richness of such expressions as the following becomes clear: 'Churches and ecclesial communities';[e] 'separated brethren';[f] 'separated Churches and ecclesial communities';[g] 'full communion'—'imperfect communion'."[9][h]

"But thanks to its ecclesiology," wrote Tillard, "Vatican II was able to affirm at the same time that Churches or ecclesial communities separated from the Catholic Church are part of the single Church, and that nevertheless incorporation in Christ and His Church possesses within the Catholic Church the fullness that it does not have elsewhere."[9] In 2007, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) clarified "the authentic meaning" of the ecclesiological expression "Church" which "according to Catholic doctrine," the texts of the Second Vatican Council and those of the Magisterium since the Second Vatican Council do not call Christian Communities born out of the Reformation of the 16th century as "Churches" because "these Communities do not enjoy apostolic succession in the sacrament of Orders, and are, therefore, deprived of a constitutive element of the Church."[10] William Whalen wrote, in Separated Brethren, that "'separated brethren' refers to Christians united by baptism and committed to Jesus Christ but divided by theological beliefs."[11]: 9  Whalen explained, that Protestant Reformation Christians broke "the bond of common faith" and "they became separated brethren."[11]: 11  "All Christians who are baptized and believe in Christ but are not professed Catholics" are separated brethren, according to John Hardon in Modern Catholic Dictionary. "More commonly the term is applied to Protestants."[12] Likewise, "separated brethren" according to Catholic Answers, in This Rock, "refers to those who, though separated from full communion with the Catholic Church, have been justified through baptism and are thus brethren in Christ."[13] UR "teaches that 'all who have been justified by faith in baptism are members of Christ's body, and have a right to be called Christian, and so are correctly accepted as brothers by the children of the Catholic Church'."[13][14][15]: n.99  J. A. Jungmann and K. Stasiak wrote, in New Catholic Encyclopedia, that "the Second Vatican Council's call for a greater spirit of ecumenism among churches and ecclesial communities reflects the understanding that Baptism is the effecting and the sign of the fundamental unity of all Christians."[16][i]

"Because Mormonism is polytheistic and rejects the Trinity,"[j] Catholic Answers points out that, "Mormon baptism is not valid,[k] and Mormons are not considered separated brethren."[13][30] Cardinal Urbano Navarrete Cortés clarified, in L'Osservatore Romano, "that in all of the effects of the pastoral, administrative and juridical practices of the Church the Mormons are not to be considered as belonging to an 'ecclesial community not in full communion with the Catholic Church', but simply as non-baptized."[30] Baptism conferred by The Christian Community, founded by Rudolf Steiner;[31] The New Church, founded by Emmanuel Swedenborg;[32] conferred with the formula "I baptize you in the name of the Creator, and of the Redeemer, and of the Sanctifier";[33] or, conferred with the formula "I baptize you in the name of the Creator, and of the Liberator, and of the Sustainer" are also deemed not valid.[33]

"Separated brethren" is a term sometimes used by the Roman Catholic Church and its clergy and members to refer to baptized members of other Christian traditions.[34] Also applied to Christians of the Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox churches.[citation needed] The phrase is a translation of the Latin phrase fratres seiuncti.[35]

Before the Second Vatican Council, per the pronouncements of the Council of Trent, the Roman Catholic Church officially referred to Protestants and other non-Roman Catholic Christians as "heretics" not having hope of salvation outside of the "Church of Rome".[36] In c. 1960 – c. 1962 preparation work for draft texts of Second Vatican Council documents, a "report urged respectful use of the terms dissidents or separated brethren, in place of heretics and schismatics."[37] After the Second Vatican Council, however, "that habit of unthinkingly hurling accusations of heresy at Protestants pretty much died out".[36] Since at least the mid-1990s, the term has often been replaced by Roman Catholic officials with phrases such as "other Christians".[35]

At least one Roman Catholic writer does not consider Mormons and members of some other religious groups to be separated brethren.[11] Among the groups not considered to be separated brethren are "Jews, Mormons, Christian Scientists, Muslims, Buddhists, and other groups."[11] By the 21st century, within the Roman Catholic faith, Jews are described as and considered elder brothers in the faith.

Notes

  1. ^ The excerpt, from APC 63 cited by Flinn,[2] is translated on the Vatican website as "the communities that are separated from the See of Blessed Peter" and a related excerpt, from APC 64, is translated on the Vatican website as "those who are adorned with the name of Christian even though separated from Us and from one another."[3]
  2. ^ LG 14.2 quoted by Tillard.[9]
  3. ^ LG 14.3; 15.2 quoted by Tillard.[9]
  4. ^ LG 16 quoted by Tillard.[9]
  5. ^ UR 3.3 quoted by Tillard; cf. LG 15.1 cited in Tillard.[9]
  6. ^ brothers divided; UR 3.4 quoted by Tillard.[9]
  7. ^ UR 3.4 quoted by Tillard.[9]
  8. ^ UR 3.1 quoted by Tillard.[9]
  9. ^ According to the 1983 Code of Canon Law (1983 CIC), baptism "is validly conferred only by a washing of true water with the proper form of words."[17]: can.849  The 1983 CIC states that "in a case of necessity any person with the right intention, confers baptism licitly."[17]: can.861§2 [15]: n.95.a  "Those baptized in a non-Catholic ecclesial community must not be baptized conditionally unless, after an examination of the matter and the form of the words used in the conferral of baptism and a consideration of the intention of the baptized adult and the minister of the baptism, a serious reason exists to doubt the validity of the baptism."[17]: can.869§2  See CCC. n. 1278. The essential rite of Baptism consists in immersing the candidate in water or pouring water on his head, while pronouncing the invocation of the Most Holy Trinity: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)[18] "The Catholic Church recognizes as valid baptisms performed by other churches and ecclesial communities if these two conditions are met, and if there is no serious reason to question either the intention of the minister and the free acceptance of Baptism by the one baptized."[16][15]: nn.93, 95.a–95.c 
  10. ^ According to Catholic Answers, in This Rock, "Mormonism is essentially polytheistic."[19] Catholic Answers quoted from Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, in which the founder of the Latter Day Saint movement, Joseph Smith, Jr., affirmed: "I have always declared God to be a distinct personage, Jesus Christ a separate and distinct personage from God the Father, and the Holy Ghost was a distinct personage and a Spirit: and these three constitute three distinct personages and three Gods."[19][20] The theologies of God in Christianity and God in Mormonism are different.[21][22][23][24] Also see Richard Abanes in Inside today's Mormonism.[25] Pope John Paul II said, "The Christian doctrine on the Trinity, confirmed by the Councils, explicitly rejects any form of 'tritheism' or 'polytheism'."[26] See CCC. n. 2112. The first commandment condemns polytheism. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)[18]
  11. ^ Pope John Paul II, as legislator, approved the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith's 2001 decision.[27] Luis Ladaria explained, in L'Osservatore Romano, the reasons for deciding that "it is not Christian Baptism" are that a "divergence on Trinity and baptism invalidates the intention of the Mormon minister of baptism and of the one to be baptized."[28] Contrast with Alonzo Gaskill in FARMS Review of Books.[29]

References

  1. ^ [Archbishops and Bishops of Tuscany?] (1793). "Dissertatio III: In qua examinantur duo summi Pontificis brevia ad Episcopum Clussio–Pientinum data". Acta Congregationis archiepiscoporum et episcoporum Hetruriae Florentiae anno MDCCLXXVII (in Latin). Vol. 4. Bambergae; Herbipoli: Goebhardt. p. 1003. OCLC 79652146. Retrieved 2014-01-23. Verum tamen persuadere mihi minime possum, hanc animi venerationem in eo esse ponendam, ut eidem excessiua quaedam iura adscribantur, quae etdem non competunt, quae antiquitati erant ignota, quaeque maxima ex parte fatale illud schisma causarunt quod fratres nostros a nobis seiunctos tenet. Here, Clusinus et Pientinus is spelled Clussio - Pientinum and clusio - pientinus.
  2. ^ a b Flinn, Frank K (2007). "Protestant Reformation". Encyclopedia of Catholicism. Facts on File Library of Religion and Mythology: Encyclopedia of World Religions. New York: Facts on File. p. 535. ISBN 9780816054558. Retrieved 2014-01-25 – via Gale Virtual Reference Library. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Unknown parameter |subscription= ignored (|url-access= suggested) (help)
  3. ^ Pope John XXIII (1959-06-29). "Ad Petri Cathedram". Vatican.va. nn.63–64. Retrieved 2014-01-25. Using English translation from The Pope Speaks. 5. Huntington, IN: Our Sunday Visitor: 359–83. Autumn, 1959. ISSN 0032-4353. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)
  4. ^ Kelly, John N. D.; Walsh, Michael J, eds. (2010). "Leo XIII". A Dictionary of Popes. Oxford paperback reference (2nd ed.). Oxford [u.a]: Oxford University Press. p. 317. ISBN 9780199295814.
  5. ^ a b Farrugia, Edward G (2007). "Re-reading Orientalium Ecclesiarum". Gregorianum. 88 (2). Rome: Pontificia Università Gregoriana: 355. ISSN 0017-4114.
  6. ^ Pope Leo XIII (1894-11-30). Orientalium Dignitas. Vatican City.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  7. ^ Catholic Church. Second Vatican Council; Pope Paul VI (1964-11-24). Orientalium Ecclesiarum. Vatican City.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  8. ^ Flannery, Austin, ed. (1996). Vatican Council II: the conciliar and postconciliar documents. Vatican collection. Vol. 1 (New rev. 2nd ed.). New York: Costello. pp. 419, 421. ISBN 9780918344397.
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h i Tillard, J. M. R. (2003). "Incorporation into the Church (Membership)". In Carson, Thomas (ed.). New Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 7 (2nd ed.). Detroit: Gale. pp. 380–383. ISBN 0-7876-4011-5. Retrieved 2014-01-24 – via Gale Virtual Reference Library.
  10. ^ Catholic Church. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith; Levada, William (2007-06-29). Responses to some questions regarding certain aspects of the Doctrine on the Church. Vatican City: Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
  11. ^ a b c d Whalen, William J (2002). : Separated brethren: a review of Protestant, Anglican, Eastern Orthodox & other religions in the United States (rev. ed.). Huntington, IN: Our Sunday Visitor. pp. 9, 11. ISBN 978-1-931709-05-7. Retrieved 2010-06-16.
  12. ^ Hardon, John A (2013). "Separated brethren". Catholic dictionary: an abridged and updated edition of Modern Catholic dictionary. New York: Image. p. 468. ISBN 9780307886347. Retrieved 2014-01-24.
  13. ^ a b c Catholic Answers Staff (Oct., 2002). "Quick Questions". This rock: the magazine of Catholic apologetics and evangelization. 13 (8). San Diego, CA: Catholic Answers. ISSN 1049-4561. Archived from the original on 2004-09-12. Retrieved 2014-01-25 – via Catholic.com. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  14. ^ Catholic Church. Second Vatican Council (1964-11-21). Unitatis Redintegratio. Vatican City.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  15. ^ a b c Catholic Church. Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity (1993-03-25). Directory for the application of principles and norms on ecumenism. Retrieved 2014-01-23 – via Vatican.va.
  16. ^ a b Jungmann, J. A; Stasiak, K (2003). "Baptism, Sacrament of". In Carson, Thomas (ed.). New Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 2 (2nd ed.). Detroit: Gale. pp. 66–67. ISBN 0-7876-4006-9. Retrieved 2014-01-24 – via Gale Virtual Reference Library.
  17. ^ a b c Catholic Church (1999) [©1998]. Code of canon law: new English translation. IntraText. Washington, DC: Canon Law Society of America. ISBN 0-943616-79-4 http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/_INDEX.HTM – via Vatican.va. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  18. ^ a b Catholic Church (2003) [©1993]. Catechism of the Catholic Church. IntraText. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. OCLC 68115621. Retrieved 2014-01-08 – via Vatican.va.
  19. ^ a b Catholic Answers Staff (Feb., 1990). "Quick Questions". This rock: the magazine of Catholic apologetics and evangelization. 1 (2). San Diego, CA: Catholic Answers. ISSN 1049-4561. Archived from the original on 2005-02-08. Retrieved 2014-01-25 – via Catholic.com. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  20. ^ Smith, Joseph, Jr. (1938). Smith, Joseph Fielding (ed.). Teachings of the prophet Joseph Smith. [Salt Lake City]: Deseret news Press. p. 370. LCCN 38008207. Archived from the original on 2005-02-13. Retrieved 2014-01-25 – via Book of Abraham Project. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  21. ^ Arbaugh, George B. (Jun., 1940). "Evolution of Mormon doctrine". Church History. 9 (2). Cambridge University Press: 157–169. ISSN 0009-6407. JSTOR 3160352. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  22. ^ Howsepian, A. A. (Sep., 1996). "Are Mormons theists?". Church History. 32 (3). Cambridge University Press: 357–370. ISSN 0009-6407. JSTOR 20019828. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  23. ^ Ostler, Blake T. (Sep., 1997). "Worshipworthiness and the Mormon concept of God". Religious Studies. 33 (3). Cambridge University Press: 315–326. ISSN 0034-4125. JSTOR 20008108. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  24. ^ Heeren, John; Lindsey, Donald B.; Mason, Marylee (Dec., 1984). "The Mormon concept of Mother in Heaven: a sociological account of its origins and development". Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 23 (4). Society for the Scientific Study of Religion: 396–411. ISSN 0021-8294. JSTOR 1385727. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  25. ^ Abanes, Richard (2007). "One God versus many gods". Inside today's Mormonism. Eugene, OR: Harvest House Publishers. ISBN 9780736919685.
  26. ^ Pope John Paul II (1999-05-05). General audience. n. 3. Archived from the original on 2001-04-10. Retrieved 2014-01-25 – via Vatican.va. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  27. ^ Catholic Church. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith; Ratzinger, Joseph (2001-06-05). Response to a "dubium" on the validity of baptism conferred by "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints", called "Mormons". Archived from the original on 2001-12-23. Retrieved 2014-01-25 – via Vatican.va. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  28. ^ Ladaria, Luis (2001-08-01). "The question of the validity of baptism conferred in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints". L'Osservatore Romano (Weekly ed.). Vatican City. p. 4. ISSN 1563-6178. Archived from the original on 2001-09-03. Retrieved 2014-01-29 – via Eternal Word Television Network. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  29. ^ Gaskill, Alonzo (2001). "Maximus Nothus Decretum: a look at the recent Catholic declaration regarding Latter-day Saint Baptisms". FARMS review of books. 13 (2). Provo, UT: Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies. ISSN 1099-9450. Archived from the original on 2014-01-29. Retrieved 2014-01-29. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  30. ^ a b Navarrete, Urbano (2001-08-01). "Response of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith about the validity of baptism conferred in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints". L'Osservatore Romano (Weekly ed.). Vatican City. p. 5. ISSN 1563-6178. Archived from the original on 2014-01-30 – via Vatican.va. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  31. ^ Catholic Church. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (1991-03-09). Notification regarding the validity of the baptism conferred by the "Christian Community" or "Die Christengemeinschaft" of Rudolf Steiner. Archived from the original on 2014-01-30. Retrieved 2014-01-25 – via Vatican.va. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help); line feed character in |title= at position 91 (help)
  32. ^ Catholic Church. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (1992-11-20). Notification on the validity of the baptism conferred in "The New Church". Archived from the original on 2014-01-30. Retrieved 2014-01-25 – via Vatican.va. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  33. ^ a b Catholic Church. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (2008-02-01). Responses to Questions Proposed on the Validity of Baptism. Archived from the original on 2012-03-20. Retrieved 2014-01-25 – via Vatican.va. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  34. ^ Kroll, Paul (October–November 2007). "Church History Corner: Vatican II and the Future of Church Unity". Christian Odyssey. 3 (5). Glendora, CA: Worldwide Church of God: 18–19. Archived from the original on 2012-03-08. Retrieved 2010-06-21. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  35. ^ a b Wells, Christopher (2009). "The Singular Grace of Division's Wound". Ecclesiology. 5 (1). Leiden, Netherlands: Brill: 10–11. doi:10.1163/174553108X378468. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  36. ^ a b Oakes, Edward T. (December 19, 2007). "Are Protestants heretics?". First Things Online. New York: Institute on Religion and Public Life. Retrieved 2010-07-09. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work= (help)
  37. ^ Wicks, Jared (Jul., 2012). "Still More Light on Vatican Council II". The Catholic Historical Review. 98 (3). Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press: 483. doi:10.1353/cat.2012.0169. ISSN 0008-8080. {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Check date values in: |date= (help)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unitatis_redintegratio&oldid=593237107"