Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Media, the arts, and architecture

• Talk:Authorship_of_A_Course_in_Miracles Matter of Original Research and unverifiable sources. 08:07, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Univisium Dispute over whether or not calling an uncommon film format "non-standard" is proper or deprecative. 22:14, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Tenth_Doctor Dispute over inclusion of Sarah Jane Smith as a companion of the Tenth Doctor. the Doctor Who Wikiproject has claimed ownership of the page in violation of wikirules, and has decided consensus means they say she is not a companion, depsite several seasons on the show as one.15:28, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Hal Gardner and Talk:Charles Logan. (Both are characters in 24.) Two disputes; first whether Gardner should be referred to as "President Hal Gardner" in the infobox and second whether both characters should be listed as affiliated with the Republican Party. 16:18, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Wizard - More than half of the article is a laundry list. Then, to make things worse, edit warring over the laundry list is occuring. Any help is appreciated. Nandesuka 13:49, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Jesus Christ as source of "A Course in Miracles" - Help with copy editing regarding (admittedly complicated) issue with regard to the author of A Course In Miracles. We have an edit war on our hands, up to two and three revisions per day with no apparent end in sight. -- 04:34, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Cartoon Network Studios - Should this article be split into seperate articles (Cartoon Network Studios and Hanna-Barbera)? --FuriousFreddy 13:17, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:The Oregonian - discussion about whether to include criticisms of the paper by a political action group. 03:44, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:List of Jewish American journalists - dispute over what constitutes a journalist for the purposes of this list.--Isotope23 12:28, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:List of computer pranks - dispute regarding WP:N, WP:SPAM, WP:NOT and WP:OR, in reference to how many pranks should be included in the list. Λυδαcιτγ 00:00, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Christina Aguilera - dispute over whether the lead section is neutral, whether a section in the article is too detailed, and whether a section containing unsourced material should be left in the article. 22:16, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:The Bloodhound Gang - discussion on whether to include the song lyrics of a Bloodhound Gang song that has come under attack by people claiming it is racist. Opponents believe that it violates Wikipedia's policy of No original research. --Liface 18:50, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Catman Cohen – This comment suggests that I was mistaken to place an {{NPOV}} tag on this article. Should the tag be removed? --Russ Blau (talk) 14:39, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Paul Robeson Was Robeson a member of the Communist Party? Should the article be placed in Category:American communists? 16:46, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:United States men's national soccer team#1930 World Cup placing Did the USA finish third, or were they joint losing semi-finalists with Yugslavia? 14:26, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Woody Allen - #1 do child molestation charges appearing in an encyclopedic source belong in this article and to what extent? #2 woody meets wiki definition of stepfather, should he be called a stepfather? Justforasecond 03:45, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Club music - disputed merge with Electronic dance 20:50, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:House music - lots of personal attacks over seemingly minor issues. See also Talk:Club_music and a few others. 20:50, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:List of songs deemed inappropriate by Clear Channel following the September 11, 2001 attacks - Dispute over whether or not Clear Channel created the list. Sources are cited in the article saying they did. -- 21:00, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Ashlee Simpson - dispute over whether some sections of the article are too detailed. 11:22, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Temporal_Cold_War -- Dispute over whether particular assertions and conclusions are verifiable and constitute original research (see "Controversy").-22:31, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:X-Men:_The_Last_Stand -- Dispute over inclusion or exclusion of certain reviews of the movie. 22:34, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:List of Lost episodes -- No consensus on whether LOST episode articles should remain individually and listed in List of Lost Episodes or episodes should be grouped in long season articles (Episodes of Lost (season 1), Episodes of Lost (season 2)). -- 22:23, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:More Cowbell -- Deadlock over whether to remove a currently existing animated gif. Those for removing say that the animation is distracting and that the article description with an image should be sufficient; those for keeping say that the animation is needed to fully convey the essential elements of the comedy skit. 02:22, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Discrepancies (Dune) once again the subject of whether the new books evil robots go against Herberts vision of a ideological revolt. 08:48, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Aleister Crowley and Talk:Aleister Crowley (biography) - Is it ever acceptable on Wikipedia to fork a person's biographical details off as a separate article from their primary one? 01:37, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Niilo Paasivirta dispute whether it is a valid point of view to interpret the writings of Niilo Paasivirta seriously (rather than as a satire).15:36, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Belly dance — dispute about addition of external links, including dispute concerning identity of editor adding link as owner of site in question. 14:01, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Internet art -- Disagreement over whether the "Internet art link collection" section should stay or be removed. 09:59, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

• Talk:The_Master_and_Margarita -- Disagreement over whether a new translation be listed in the translations section. 21:28, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Dia Mirza: Dispute with anon about whether content (ads, commercials) is appropriate. --Plumcouch 19:43, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

• Talk:Daedalus class battlecruiser -- should possible spoiler content be hidden from view as white text on a white background. 02:53, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Sharon Stone -- dispute over whether a screenshot from Basic Instinct showing Stone's genitalia should be included. 16:35, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:DHARMA Initiative stations -- dispute regarding the addition of subsections under "Purpose of the station". 12:28, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

• Talk:Ctrl+Alt+Del -- Disagreement over whether Winter-een-mas should have its own page, I believe there is more information now and it should, despite a previous decision for deletion (which was based on a merge that didnt happen). 12:24, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Giacomo Puccini -- disagreement over what should be the primary name of Messa (vs. Messa di Gloria), I believe the popular usage should previal (with explanations and warnings on "technical" name), whereas other user believes the technical name should prevail. Revolver 03:17, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Nicolas_Flamel_(Harry_Potter) Is this character close enough to the real alchemist of the same name to merge the pages? Is he a significant enough character to have his own page? Nick 04:40, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Liberal bias Should Liberal bias article exist, or should it redirect to Media bias in the United States? 17:34, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• Winter-een-mas I think there is a lot more information available now, and the subject is worth its own article again, as the CAD article doesn't have much detail. Our work on it has been reverted to a redirect again based on a previous decision I believe is outdated now. 03:49, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

• Talk:Asian fetish Lack of consensus, accusations of POV pushing; long history of problems (8 archived talk pages; 2 AfDs; controversial, POV and other tags; a neglected Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Asian fetish). 18:30, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Joel_Leyden Content dispute concerning verifiabiliy and POV. 01:34, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

• Talk:Antony and Cleopatra Should a conspiracy theory about Antony and Cleopatra containing references to Freemasonry be explained on the page? 17:05, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Ahmed Osman - A multiple-revert situation in which one editor wishes to use archaic spellings like Ægyptian while others wish to use modern spellings like Egyptian. 05:02, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

• Talk:Lolicon - Should the link to the Renchan Lolicon Community (Note: viewing images at this site may be illegal in your jurisdiction) be kept in the article, or deleted? The site in question contains drawings of very young children naked, in suggestive poses, and/or engaged in sex.
• Image talk:DavidTibet.jpg. A dispute about whether the image qualifies for fair-use or not. IFD nomination gathered no discussion, hence the image stayed. Needs more debate than the two parties currently involved. 04:58, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Clive Bull A dispute has arisen over an edit which a number of different IP addresses keep reverting, while other editors feel the new version is more neutral and encyclopaedic. This is the version suggested by Minglex, this is the version the IPs keep reverting back to. The dispute has been entangled with a hoax perpetrated on the article of fellow LBC DJ Iain Lee, in which one or more vandals went to elaborate lengths to convince other editors that Lee had come out as gay on air (he had not), including creating sockpuppet accounts and accounts that impersonated established Wikipedia editors. The sockpuppet and impersonation accounts took the side of the anonymous editors in this dispute. The anons claim to be editing from shared IPs and that this is coincidental. We need some more eyes on this in order to form an indisputable consensus one way or the other. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 14:57, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Does the image in JSTOR look better on the left side or right side of the page? Small question, 12+ month long debate. Your thoughts welcome! -- Stbalbach 18:24, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:The Romantics Grammar: "The Romantics is..." or "The Romantics are..."? 17:44, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:A Turning Point in National History. This is an article on a Dutch book with no English translation and someone therefore suggests it should be deleted because there is no verifiable English source. The counterargument is that that would mean there shouldn't be any articles on, say, English books in the Dutch Wikipedia. The preceding discussion has been very long, but this is what it has come down to now. 11:00, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:The Rolling Stones Grammar: "The Rolling Stones is..." or "The Rolling Stones are..."? 18:23, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Lost (TV Series)-Episode Summary Trivia Dispute over whether or not a trivia element is verifiable and relevant in the context of a television show. Issue Summary 22:15, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• talk:Nataliya Dmytruk (also see these comments in edit history). The subject of the article is a notable (see article) sign-language interpreter who works on television providing translation of the newscasts into the sign language (for the deaf viewers). Is it correct to add her to a cat:Journalists in addition to "cat:Television personalities"? Her notability, as well as belonging to the TV-personalities cat, is not challenged by either side. The dispute is only the applicability of the "Journalists" cat. One user persists in using cat:Journalists even after an uninvolved user prompted by WP:3O agreed that journalists cat isn't applcaible. 23:52, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

• Talk:Rich Fields User:BIZZREP insists on removing the "Criticisms" section. 19:18, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Backing vocalist — a dispute concerning the status of "backup" and "background" alternatives. 09:14, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:I Love Toys - People insist on adding a list to the article which infringes on VH1's copyright. 05:08, 29 March 2006 (UTC)