Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lebanesetruth: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
cu results
→‎Comments by other users: another likely sock
Line 24: Line 24:


thank you [[User:talal.talal1|talal.talal1]] ([[User talk:talal.talal1|talk]]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned"> — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 11:04, 9 September 2014 (UTC)</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
thank you [[User:talal.talal1|talal.talal1]] ([[User talk:talal.talal1|talk]]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned"> — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 11:04, 9 September 2014 (UTC)</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:As {{user|Painting101]] showed up this morning and within 2 hours was autoconfirmed and targeting the same article, he is either a sock or a meatpuppet. Hm, supposedly it takes 4 days ''and'' 10 edits to edit a semi-protected article, but he did it in less than 2 hours. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 14:01, 9 September 2014 (UTC)


======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======

Revision as of 14:01, 9 September 2014

Lebanesetruth

Lebanesetruth (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
09 September 2014

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

Suspected sockpuppets


User:Talal.talal1 was blocked several days ago for sockpuppeteering. Now this user has sprung up doing the same edits to the same article. Callsfortruth (talk) 08:50, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • User:Lebanesetruth has been blocked (the sockpuppeteer wasn't for some strange reason known to the blocking admin and the sockpuppeteer/PR firm employee). Now he is also editing using User:Philanthropist 1001.
Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

the user above mentioned my account as a sockpuppet, just checking his history and contribution page will show exactly the amount of confrontations he had with admins over one article he's trying to vandalise in a way contradicting with Wikipedia's BLP rules

thank you talal.talal1 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 11:04, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As {{user|Painting101]] showed up this morning and within 2 hours was autoconfirmed and targeting the same article, he is either a sock or a meatpuppet. Hm, supposedly it takes 4 days and 10 edits to edit a semi-protected article, but he did it in less than 2 hours. Dougweller (talk) 14:01, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments