User talk:EChastain: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:49, 26 October 2014

Welcome

Hello, EChastain, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:26, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

arbcom

You are clearly editing in response to Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gender_Gap_Task_Force. Please follow Wikipedia's guidelines and rules, specifically regarding WP:RS. You do not seem to be adhering to a neutral point of view. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:25, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@User:EvergreenFir There are no reliable sources in Mansplaining supporting your claim that it's an academic concept. No reason for your revert. EChastain (talk) 22:35, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are. Read WP:LEAD. Also see Talk:Mansplaining#Meme. Attempting dispute resolution. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 22:35, 26 October 2014 edit EChastain (talk \| contribs) 2,665 edits →‎arbcom: re ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:49, 26 October 2014 edit undo EvergreenFir (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 127,184 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 84:		Line 84:

	@[[User:EvergreenFir]] There are no [[WP:RS\|reliable sources]] in [[Mansplaining]] supporting your claim that it's an academic concept. No reason for your revert. [[User:EChastain\|EChastain]] ([[User talk:EChastain#top\|talk]]) 22:35, 26 October 2014 (UTC)		@[[User:EvergreenFir]] There are no [[WP:RS\|reliable sources]] in [[Mansplaining]] supporting your claim that it's an academic concept. No reason for your revert. [[User:EChastain\|EChastain]] ([[User talk:EChastain#top\|talk]]) 22:35, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
			:There are. Read [[WP:LEAD]]. Also see [[Talk:Mansplaining#Meme]]. Attempting dispute resolution. [[User:EvergreenFir\|'''<span style="color:#8b00ff;">Eve</span><span style="color:#6528c2;">rgr</span><span style="color:#3f5184;">een</span><span style="color:#197947;">Fir</span>''']] [[User talk:EvergreenFir\|(talk)]] <small>Please {{[[Template:re\|re]]}}</small> 22:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC)