Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valentina Nappi: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
keep
No edit summary
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
* '''Obvious Keep''', significant coverage in major Italian newspapers and magazines, of which the sources cited in the article are just a little extempt. [[User:Раціональне анархіст|Раціональне анархіст]], even assuming for some obscure reasons you didn't considered [[Corriere del Mezzogiorno]], [[Il Giornale]], [[Secolo d'Italia]], [[Vice (magazine)|Vice]], [[Corriere della Sera]], [[GQ]] and so on reliable, why don't make a little [[WP:BEFORE]]? Eg, these articles are from just the last month: [https://it.notizie.yahoo.com/valentina-nappi-porno-filosofia-politica-114250689.html], [http://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2014/12/31/valentina-nappi-me-e-la-critica-musicale/1307328/], [http://www.liberoquotidiano.it/news/personaggi/11729781/Valentina-Nappi-tra-sesso-e-finanza.html], [http://espresso.repubblica.it/visioni/societa/2014/10/16/news/coito-ergo-sum-valentina-nappi-la-pornostar-filosofa-1.184322], [http://www.campania24news.it/2014/12/06/valentina-nappi-candidata-alle-primarie-del-centrosinistra-58477/]. There are literally HUNDREDS of articles about her which are easily available. [[User:Cavarrone|'''C'''avarrone]] 05:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
* '''Obvious Keep''', significant coverage in major Italian newspapers and magazines, of which the sources cited in the article are just a little extempt. [[User:Раціональне анархіст|Раціональне анархіст]], even assuming for some obscure reasons you didn't considered [[Corriere del Mezzogiorno]], [[Il Giornale]], [[Secolo d'Italia]], [[Vice (magazine)|Vice]], [[Corriere della Sera]], [[GQ]] and so on reliable, why don't make a little [[WP:BEFORE]]? Eg, these articles are from just the last month: [https://it.notizie.yahoo.com/valentina-nappi-porno-filosofia-politica-114250689.html], [http://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2014/12/31/valentina-nappi-me-e-la-critica-musicale/1307328/], [http://www.liberoquotidiano.it/news/personaggi/11729781/Valentina-Nappi-tra-sesso-e-finanza.html], [http://espresso.repubblica.it/visioni/societa/2014/10/16/news/coito-ergo-sum-valentina-nappi-la-pornostar-filosofa-1.184322], [http://www.campania24news.it/2014/12/06/valentina-nappi-candidata-alle-primarie-del-centrosinistra-58477/]. There are literally HUNDREDS of articles about her which are easily available. [[User:Cavarrone|'''C'''avarrone]] 05:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' as notable to Italy through mainstream Italian sources is fine for en.Wikiedia. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt, </font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>Michael Q.</small></sup>]]'' 05:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' as notable to Italy through mainstream Italian sources is fine for en.Wikiedia. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt, </font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>Michael Q.</small></sup>]]'' 05:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
*:'''Comment''': I don't read Italian. She fails Pornbio. No English RS in the article establishing GN. *shrug* --[[User:Раціональне анархіст|Раціональне анархіст]] ([[User talk:Раціональне анархіст|talk]]) 06:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:20, 4 January 2015

Valentina Nappi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable; fails WP:Pornbio with no award wins. Раціональне анархіст (talk) 04:26, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]