User talk:Ddstretch: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Ddstretch/Archives/2015/April) (bot |
→Knowledgekid87: new section |
||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
*agreed. — <small><span class="nowrap" style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;"> ? </font>]]</span></small> 04:37, 27 April 2015 (UTC) |
*agreed. — <small><span class="nowrap" style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;"> ? </font>]]</span></small> 04:37, 27 April 2015 (UTC) |
||
== Knowledgekid87 == |
|||
Hi. {{u| Knowledgekid87}}, whom you unblocked recently because he assured you he would stop stirring up trouble, is stirring the pot again by posting to Lightbreather with trivia about me. See: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:EChastain&diff=661024593&oldid=661012869 Knowledgekid87 posts to Lightbreather to stir the pot]<p>Now that Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather is open, he is getting involved again. He reverted my post to him (the first time I've ever posted on his page) [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Knowledgekid87&diff=next&oldid=661032196] to warn him. He's caused a lot of trouble by this sort of thing. He deleted from his page a reminder from the Arb clerk to stop editing Arbcom pages regarding this case that only arbs and clerks are allowed to edit. Please nip this in the bud before it gets out of hand. He's already been involved in discussions, now hatted, at [[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather/Evidence]]. Hope my asking this isn't an intrusion. But this case already shows signs of becoming a big brouhaha. Please do nip this. Thanks, [[User:EChastain|EChastain]] ([[User talk:EChastain|talk]]) 01:10, 6 May 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:10, 6 May 2015
|
• Jly 2006 - Nov 2006 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 8 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
| This is Ddstretch's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 8 days  |
| SandBoxes |
|---|
| • CP x Settlmnt |
| • Settlmnt x CP |
| • "Former ..." Artcl |
| • Artcl for CP in Ches |
| • Misc1 |
| • Misc2 |
| • EP Tmplt |
| • CP Tmplt |
| • Crewe Article Sandbox |
| * Arbcom evidence |
Well said
Thanks for your insightful comment at AE.Two kinds of porkMakin'Bacon 03:44, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- agreed. — Ched : ? 04:37, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Knowledgekid87
Hi. Knowledgekid87, whom you unblocked recently because he assured you he would stop stirring up trouble, is stirring the pot again by posting to Lightbreather with trivia about me. See: Knowledgekid87 posts to Lightbreather to stir the pot
Now that Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather is open, he is getting involved again. He reverted my post to him (the first time I've ever posted on his page) [1] to warn him. He's caused a lot of trouble by this sort of thing. He deleted from his page a reminder from the Arb clerk to stop editing Arbcom pages regarding this case that only arbs and clerks are allowed to edit. Please nip this in the bud before it gets out of hand. He's already been involved in discussions, now hatted, at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather/Evidence. Hope my asking this isn't an intrusion. But this case already shows signs of becoming a big brouhaha. Please do nip this. Thanks, EChastain (talk) 01:10, 6 May 2015 (UTC)