Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/73rd Academy Awards/archive1: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
rc + s |
→73rd Academy Awards: promoted |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
*'''Support''' Good work on this list. [[User:Cowlibob|Cowlibob]] ([[User talk:Cowlibob|talk]]) 21:27, 7 July 2015 (UTC) |
*'''Support''' Good work on this list. [[User:Cowlibob|Cowlibob]] ([[User talk:Cowlibob|talk]]) 21:27, 7 July 2015 (UTC) |
||
Closing as '''promoted''' - another one down! --'''[[User:PresN|<span style="color:green">Pres</span>]][[User talk:PresN|<span style="color:blue">N</span>]]''' 14:32, 8 July 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:32, 8 July 2015
73rd Academy Awards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Birdienest81 (talk) 16:50, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
I am nominating the 2011 Oscars for featured list because I believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I also followed how the 1929, 1987, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014 Oscars were written. Birdienest81 (talk) 16:50, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Resolved comments from FrankBoy CHITCHAT 12:22, 19 June 2015 (UTC) |
---|
Comments from FrB.TG
|
- Support – The issues I raised have all been addressed. -- FrankBoy CHITCHAT 12:22, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- I am going to point out again that these awards articles ought to have a controversies section. Every year, immediately after, or maybe even years later, notable figures will complain that some awards did not go to the most deserving winner. Nergaal (talk) 19:32, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- Again, in Oscar ceremony articles, we won't give attention to what was snubbed for the reason of objectivity. Unless the incident resulted in an action such as a protest (i.e. protests at the 64th and 68th Oscars from homophobia and racism respectively), this information of what was more deserving or not belongs in the respective film's articles.
- Support: All good! :) --Krimuk|90 (talk) 08:37, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, very much! :)
- Support the only problems I could find were a couple misuses of italics, which I fixed myself. Good work! Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:52, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- @SNUGGUMS" Thanks for making the changes yourself.
Resolved comments from Cowlibob (talk) 21:27, 7 July 2015 (UTC) |
---|
*ALT text needed for main poster image.
Cowlibob (talk) 14:09, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
|
- Support Good work on this list. Cowlibob (talk) 21:27, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Closing as promoted - another one down! --PresN 14:32, 8 July 2015 (UTC)