Jump to content

Talk:Karanvir Bohra: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Turehnde - "→‎Recent content removals: "
Derevation (talk | contribs)
Fits in
Line 1: Line 1:
{{GA nominee|17:57, 5 October 2015 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:Derevation|<font color="Orange">'''Dere'''</font><font color="blue">'''vation'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Derevation|<font color="Green">Give Me Five</font>]]</sup>|page=1|subtopic=Television|status=|note=}}

{{WikiProject Biography
{{WikiProject Biography
| living=yes
| living=yes

Revision as of 17:57, 5 October 2015

WikiProject iconBiography Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

a lot of irrelevant information on the page

needs to be looked upon and removed

I think almost all of the unnecessary trivia has been removed now. Regards,

Rishika.dhanawade (talk) 2:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Recent content removals

I actually agree with some of the removals of content by User:Hollywoodbollywood22 aka User:Durr-e-shehwar. In particular:

  • The various roles Bohra was "approached" for but did not take (or did not get). That provides no encyclopedic information on Bohra, and this source doesn't just get Bohra playing the role wrong, but also his supposed co-stars Matt Damon and Dev Patel - it can only be considered rumormongering years before the film was shot.
  • The "in the media" section consists solely of irrelevant trivia. We're not a celebrity gossip rag, and the quotes in that section are excessive.

If no good reason is presented why that content improves the encyclopedia, I'll remove those parts again. Huon (talk) 16:29, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As it happens I agree, and he made the fair point that this article did not (to him anyway) get treated the same way as others in the category (e.g his comment on my TP here)- but as I said then, it wasn't his edits, it was the WP:BATTLEGROUND attitude he displayed towards other editor's advice. There's no reason the edits themselves can't be discussed. In fact so far we a (two-editor!) 100% consensus towards change Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:55, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, so i removed some content. please see my edits. Jimmy Aneja (talk) 11:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimmy Aneja: Good man! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:46, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The user Digvijay is being a pain, this user is removing stuff from other pages, but when it comes to this page he/she gets angryDon 03:53, 17 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Turehnde (talkcontribs)