User talk:Point by point

Hello, Point by point, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for registering an account. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
Introduction  5   The five pillars of Wikipedia   How to edit a page   Help   Tips	How to write a great article   Manual of Style   Be Bold   Assume Good faith   Get adopted
If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or get instant online help at IRC. You can also place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will come shortly to answer your questions.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:32, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Possible copyright violation at your userpage

Some or all of the content appears to have been copy pasted from http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/point and has been removed. Please remember that you must write in your own words. We cannot copy and paste from other websites. Please read WP:COPYVIO. If I have made an error, please accept my apologies. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:32, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Wow, all this for a definition? It is supposed to be used. I did not pretend like if it was representing the cambridge dictionary. I am pretty sure, it's ok, to use a dictionary definition. --Point by point (talk) 01:48, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

I was trying to make my point --Point by point (talk) 01:52, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

I understand. I'm just doing my job. The bottom of the site says "© Cambridge University Press 2015". Removing the content protects Cambridge, the owner of the text, but also protects Wikipedia. Thanks for your understanding. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:03, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Point by point, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Point by point! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Worm That Turned (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

ARBPIA

Are you aware of WP:ARBPIA? Talk:List of military occupations is under these Discretionary sanctions. There's a banner explaining them on this articles talk page. Among other things the article is under WP:1RR. If you have any questions in regards to these sanctions I would be happy to answer anything I can. Good day.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 01:36, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

I thought we agreed. Apparently, your respond was a mockery.

Respond of the 9 October 2015 on the Talk:List of military occupations --Point by point (talk) 02:04, 11 October 2015 (UTC) Here is your official notification:

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 Zero^talk 23:35, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Could I defend myself, please? Could you explain, what I did wrong?

--Point by point (talk) 02:04, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Please read the second sentence inside the box. This notice is not an accusation of wrongdoing. It is the standard way to inform editors that the sanctions exist; now it is is your responsibility to ascertain what the rules are in detail and to abide by them. Zero^talk 02:22, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

WP:COPYVIO

Please note that your edit here violated copyvio, among many other things, detailed here. Copyright is taken very seriously, in particular, copy-pasting stuff is unacceptable 99% of the time. Kingsindian ♝♚ 00:04, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

I have reverted a POV pushing deletion by Palestine-info, but I did not know that the text was a plagiarism. [1].

--Point by point (talk) 01:48, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Disagreement

In the event that you are lost the appropriate place to respond is over on the talk page of the article. Talk:List of military occupations <A convenient link to said talk page. You have exposed the reasons for your position on the talk page. I have responded on that talk page that your reasons are not worth responding to. As for anything else that you have said, WP:ANI is that way. You can take your failure or refusal to get the point there.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 03:10, 18 October 2015 (UTC)