User talk:Elockid: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:58, 14 November 2015

E L O C K I D

 
Home

Talk Page

Contributions

My Stats

Archives

Subpages

Email

E L O C K I D ' S U S E R P A G E

Click here to leave me a message.

Hoklo Taiwanese and Chen Chih-hsiung

Groups remember first independence martyr - Taipei Times

--223.136.72.33 (talk) 04:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--223.137.145.54 (talk) 14:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

None of those lessen the fact that you're a blocked user. Elockid^(BOO!) 14:38, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Israel edits

Cool Troll Killer has taken up where Wolfgangmatron left-off. What was the rational behind Wolfgangmatrons block? Murry1975 (talk) 19:32, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Those are socks of a prolific sockmaster named AndresHerutJaim (talk · contribs). Elockid^(BOO!) 19:39, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking it was a bit socky. I see you have PP, thanks. Murry1975 (talk) 19:50, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Feel free to stop by anytime. Elockid^(BOO!) 19:51, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why am i blocked from editing Wikipedia?

You blocked my IP because i am using a proxy, when i am editing from one of the computers at my school. Can you please unblock me?

Taradle (talk) 20:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Taradle[reply]

What is the block message you're getting? Elockid^(BOO!) 20:26, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible block evasion.

Note similar edits here and here. Sai's first edit was to ShivaShakthiSaiTV. GAB^Hello! 22:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked. Elockid^(BOO!) 12:11, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Missed one?

Consider doing to this what you already did to a related item. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:57, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thought I did that. Must've exited the tab while revdeleting. Thanks for notifying me. Elockid^(BOO!) 12:40, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IP making massive edits on refdesks, inserting comments with other signatures

Hi, you blocked this IP yesterday, from the edit summary and content of this edit it looks like they're back under another address. DuncanHill (talk) 09:35, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A bit late but thanks for the notification. That's just Vote (X) for Change (talk · contribs) up to their usual disruption. Elockid^(BOO!) 23:19, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User 4.30.208.70 linked to sockpuppets ranged block

Hello, The recent vandalism done by User:4.30.208.70 on multiple talk pages (including yours) are disturbing, thus should be removed or made inaccessable permanenlty from these pages' edit histories. Also based on those edits, I think they are linked to those sockpuppets whom you blocked last week, as they both have similar language and targets. 137.122.64.67 (talk) 22:09, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Im reposting this from my mobile as the computer which I first posted from had the same IP address as a user whom recently vandalized had, since this is a wifi zone where many IPs are shared and devices may use different IPs at a given time. 137.122.64.67 (talk) 22:23, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll keep an eye on the situation and apply any additional blocks if necessary. Thanks for letting me know. Elockid^(BOO!) 23:24, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Changed protection level of Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Elockid, please, i've been typing for almost an hour to add my last message in that page section where i was talking about a misuse i've undergone, you've changed the protection level so that i can't keep discussing, you're free to check that i'm not a troll or something like that, i've always been polite, never offensive, but now i can't add my last message, which is very important to me because it's about a range block extension which originally had to end in about half day but risks to continue for 2 weeks, already 4 users said it was right to tear it up, this setback's the last thing i need right now, i know you're having problem for sock puppetry but might you please find a solution for me? couldn't you for example restore the protection level for a minute, in order to give me the time to add my message, or write that message yourself since you're an admin, or allow me to edit that discussion, or do whatever else? please, don't ignore my request answer as soon as possible! the section i'm talking about is: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Collateral_damage_from_rangeblock Centocinquantuno (talk) 19:59, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Centocinquantuno:, I've given your account confirmed status. This will allow you to continue editing. Apologies for the inconvenience. Elockid ^{Message me} 20:13, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

thank you so much, you're great!

Centocinquantuno (talk) 20:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request on hold

Can you have a look at the unblock request at User talk:Faibbus? It relates to a range block which you have imposed. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There have been multiple proxies used by this range. They're in the CU logs and I believe listed in filter 464. I can't posts specifics right now since I don't have access to either. But the range is allocated to OVH. They do have an range for non-hosting customers but most of their ranges are for webhosting. The proxies that are evident with that range leads me to believe that this is a hosting range. ElofoSho (talk) 16:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here's some examples: 2001:41D0:8:B330:0:0:0:1 (talk · contribs), 2001:41D0:1:8E70:0:0:0:0 (talk · contribs), 2001:41D0:8:6A40:0:0:0:1 (talk · contribs), 2001:41D0:2:BF1C:C35F:E5F6:161D:D99A (talk · contribs). There's quite a bit of socking, I know at least one is known to use proxies/anonymizing services. Looks like classic behavior for OVH hosting. Elockid ^{Message me} 12:30, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion by whom

If you blocked my previous IP, then you should also mention there in the post. Block evasion by which user. You very well know that I am not Babitaarora because you are a Check User, isn't it? Trust me your CU tools are becoming Obsolete.

And please end the suspense of this case

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Ntiele

It's on hold for a long time. --1.39.137.116 (talk) 13:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I very well know who you are. You have consistently engaged in constant sexual harassment towards another user (I know which sockpuppet accounts they are) and have disrupted this encyclopedia while pretending to make "good" edits. Per the privacy policy, I can't disclose who you are. ElofoSho (talk) 15:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello. Are you having a good day? --217.170.205.193 (talk) 02:32, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am. Thank you for asking. Elockid ^{Message me} 03:25, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of banned user's comments

If you are going to do a mass deletion, please include the reason in the edit summary, and preferably a link that shows they are banned. StuRat (talk) 18:58, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 89: / Line 89: @@
 :Yes, I am. Thank you for asking. [[User:Elockid|<span style="font-family:Berlin Sans FB;font-size:105%;font-weight:bold;color:#4682B4">Elockid</span>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Elockid|<span style="color:#99BADD">Message me</span>]]</sup> 03:25, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
+== Deletion of banned user's comments ==
+If you are going to do a mass deletion, please include the reason in the edit summary, and preferably a link that shows they are banned. [[User:StuRat|StuRat]] ([[User talk:StuRat|talk]]) 18:58, 14 November 2015 (UTC)