Talk:Fairmont Copley Plaza: Difference between revisions
Removed requested edit tag since edit has also moved |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{{ping|Sladen}} (beginning with the History Section) |
{{ping|Sladen}} (beginning with the History Section) |
||
{{Connected contributor (paid) |
|||
| User1 = Blueberry Hill | U1-employer = 3QDigital | U1-client = Fairmont Hotels | U1-EH = yes |}} |
|||
Revision as of 15:16, 28 November 2015
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) on 7 August 2009 with the comment: Non notable hotel, no WP:RS, more of an advert than an encyclopaedia article. It was contested by Fences and windows (talk · contribs) on 12 August 2009 with the comment: I can see the article has problems, but it has received a lot of press coverage, and seems quite prestigious. This ain't just any hotel. |
Removal of Speedy Delete tag
The article was tagged as a copyrite violation of http://www.flickr.com/photos/waynehuzzey/2335203134/ The text is very similar. Looking at http://www.flickr.com/photos/waynehuzzey/2335203134 it says that it was uploaded 15 Mar 2008. Going back through the page history to a version of this article prior to that date http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Copley_Plaza&oldid=190125766 (9 Feb 2008) it is an exact duplicate of that page. I think the flickr page copied this article not the other way around. A new name 2008 (talk) 12:38, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- Fair enough - I didn't spot that. The page is still extremely spammy however. What exactly is notable about this hotel - in Wikiepdia terms? Jezhotwells (talk) 15:15, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- In its current state I do not see much that is notable. I guess this would fall under WP:Corp guidelines. If I get a chance I will look to see if I can find any referenes that can be used to establish notability. --A new name 2008 (talk) 16:52, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Notability
I think it is notable, and it seems quite prestigious a hotel. This search should give articles focussed on the hotel, it returns 200 hits:[1] and this search gives nearly 6000 hits at least mentioning it:[2]. Fences&Windows 00:13, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
@Sladen: (beginning with the History Section)
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|