User talk:Sahrin: Difference between revisions
EdJohnston (talk | contribs) →Notice of Arbitration Enforcement: Warned per the result of the AE complaint |
|||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
:It is not easy to see how you got into this fix ([[WP:AE#Sahrin]]). Any hint from you that you will change your behavior in a good way might be enough to avoid sanctions. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 19:04, 5 September 2016 (UTC) |
:It is not easy to see how you got into this fix ([[WP:AE#Sahrin]]). Any hint from you that you will change your behavior in a good way might be enough to avoid sanctions. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 19:04, 5 September 2016 (UTC) |
||
::"It is not easy to see how you got into this fix." Wow. This place has some very strange practices and customs - and I've been here for a looooong time. [[User:Sahrin|Sahrin]] ([[User talk:Sahrin#top|talk]]) 22:24, 5 September 2016 (UTC) |
::"It is not easy to see how you got into this fix." Wow. This place has some very strange practices and customs - and I've been here for a looooong time. [[User:Sahrin|Sahrin]] ([[User talk:Sahrin#top|talk]]) 22:24, 5 September 2016 (UTC) |
||
:::You've been warned per [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=738250536&oldid=738232715 the result of the AE complaint]. Further personal attacks, or charges of socking or brigading that are made without evidence may lead to a block for disruptive editing. Your edits on the topic of gun control are expected to be neutral. Thank you, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 20:44, 7 September 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:45, 7 September 2016
Disambiguation link notification for August 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:23, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Signature
You forgot to sign your message to me (see [1]). Just letting you know. Yours, Quis separabit? 22:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Personal attacks
Do not make guesses about other editors' motivations, especially not ones that attack others. I do not edit about gun topics in Wikipedia. I do care that our content policies are followed.
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 01:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Edit war warning
Your recent editing history at Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 01:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- You went ahead and reverted yet again, and included yet another personal attack in your edit note. I am providing you notice of discretionary sanctions on gun control. You need to be aware of them Jytdog (talk) 17:14, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 Jytdog (talk) 17:15, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 21:04, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Someguy1221 (talk) 00:12, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Notice of Arbitration Enforcement
Please see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Sahrin. (sorry, I couldn't find the formal notice template) Jytdog (talk) 05:14, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- It is not easy to see how you got into this fix (WP:AE#Sahrin). Any hint from you that you will change your behavior in a good way might be enough to avoid sanctions. EdJohnston (talk) 19:04, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- "It is not easy to see how you got into this fix." Wow. This place has some very strange practices and customs - and I've been here for a looooong time. Sahrin (talk) 22:24, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- You've been warned per the result of the AE complaint. Further personal attacks, or charges of socking or brigading that are made without evidence may lead to a block for disruptive editing. Your edits on the topic of gun control are expected to be neutral. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 20:44, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- "It is not easy to see how you got into this fix." Wow. This place has some very strange practices and customs - and I've been here for a looooong time. Sahrin (talk) 22:24, 5 September 2016 (UTC)