Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biocom: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Relisting Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biocom |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /> |
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /> |
||
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 06:45, 24 October 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Biocom]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 06:45, 24 October 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Biocom]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
||
('''Comment''' I do not see anything from a non-localnewspaper. I do not think the LA Times, in particulr, is considered reliable except for the field of film and associated forms of entertainment. '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 09:15, 24 October 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:15, 24 October 2016
- Biocom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The references consist entirely of its own PR, placed in various newspapers DGG ( talk ) 03:46, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:09, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:09, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:09, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:09, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- delete per nom - David Gerard (talk) 09:55, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- keep the references consist of legit news coverage from reliable sources that significantly discuss the article topic. Passes WP:ORG and WP:GNG per sources already on article. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 10:03, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:35, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:35, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:45, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:45, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
(Comment I do not see anything from a non-localnewspaper. I do not think the LA Times, in particulr, is considered reliable except for the field of film and associated forms of entertainment. DGG ( talk ) 09:15, 24 October 2016 (UTC)