User talk:Indon: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
: Yes, I briefly looked the article and it has improved a lot. I'll take a depth look again later and perhaps I'll help with some copyedits, only for technical issues. And about Mugabe, ... that crossed my mind when I reviewed it, but I've to check again. Cheers. — [[User:Indon|Indon]] ([[User_talk:Indon |<font color="green">reply</font>]]) — 11:06, 8 October 2006 (UTC) |
: Yes, I briefly looked the article and it has improved a lot. I'll take a depth look again later and perhaps I'll help with some copyedits, only for technical issues. And about Mugabe, ... that crossed my mind when I reviewed it, but I've to check again. Cheers. — [[User:Indon|Indon]] ([[User_talk:Indon |<font color="green">reply</font>]]) — 11:06, 8 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
==The Quran and science== |
|||
Would you mind weighing in on [[The_Quran_and_science|The Quran and science]]? I renominated it for deletion. If we're going to keep it it needs to be erased and started again. [[User:Arrow740|Arrow740]] 00:25, 9 October 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:25, 9 October 2006
Archive 1 (05/09/06) · Archive 2 (06/10/06) · Archive 3 (03/11/06) · Archive 4 (06/12/06) · Archive 5 (31/12/06) · Archive 6 (05/02/07) · Archive 7 (27/02/07) · Archive 8 (29/03/07) · Archive 9 (22/04/07) · Archive 10 (20/06/07) · Archive 11 (30/08/07) · Archive 12 (11/10/07) ·
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.
![]() |
If you come here because of my vandal warning messages from your talk page, then don't bother. I will directly remove your post. |
![]() |
If you come here because one of your links or your ad contents were removed, then please learn what Wikipedia is not. I will terminate linkspams on the spot. |
![]() |
If you come here to tease my blood pressure, then waste yourself somewhere else, you stinky troll! |
![]() |
If you come here to discuss about improving Wikipedia to be the best Encyclopaedia on earth, then I'd be happy to talk to you anytime. |
However,....
Talk Archived
— Indon (reply) — 13:51, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Failed GA nomination for Homophony
I noticed that you recently failed the article Homophony for WP:GA status because you believed it to be unsourced. I left a note on the talk page, and I would appreciate it if you would take a look. Thanks. -- Cielomobile minor7♭5 05:08, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for your response. As for the Derek and the Dominos article, I have left notes on the talk page asking the contributors to provide the fair use rationale. Thank you for pointing this out; it seems to be the one thing I miss. -- Cielomobile minor7♭5 17:56, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Also, you wrote that the article doesn't meet GA standards in other areas, would you mind commenting on how? No one seems to want to even put the article on hold, perhaps because it is about music theory. I left another note on the talk page. -- Cielomobile minor7♭5 02:41, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Please Check Talk:Mount Tambora
re source of that long quote. thanks --Merbabu 14:48, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Indon. About three weeks ago you were kind enough to review the GA nomination of this article. Your comments were appreciated and I have attempted to address the specific points you raised. Bear in mind that the article is about "whites", it is not intended to be an article on communal relations in Zimbabwe. As regards this "... controversial plan from Mugabe to evict whites from Zimbabwe." - I have never heard of it. But I may have missed something obvious.
If you have a few minutes, perhaps you would take another look over the article and let me have your further comments?. You can reply either here or on the article's discussion page. regards. Bob BScar23625 20:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, I briefly looked the article and it has improved a lot. I'll take a depth look again later and perhaps I'll help with some copyedits, only for technical issues. And about Mugabe, ... that crossed my mind when I reviewed it, but I've to check again. Cheers. — Indon (reply) — 11:06, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
The Quran and science
Would you mind weighing in on The Quran and science? I renominated it for deletion. If we're going to keep it it needs to be erased and started again. Arrow740 00:25, 9 October 2006 (UTC)