Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

• To list a technical request: the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:

  {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}

  This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
• If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
• If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.

Add a new request

Remove all requests

Technical requests

Edit this section if you want to move a request from Uncontroversial to Contested.

Uncontroversial technical requests

• Char Dara District → Chardara District (currently a redirect back to Char Dara District) (move · discuss) – The text of the article already uses "Chardara", the more common and concise spelling. Khestwol (talk) 08:15, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE: Highly deceptive, the user only minutes ago changed the article text. [1] 92.226.212.49 (talk) 08:52, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
• Sher Khan Bandar → Sherkhan Bandar (currently a redirect back to Sher Khan Bandar) (move · discuss) – Common and concise. The article already uses this spelling. Khestwol (talk) 08:34, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Oppose, uncredible claim, article might have been changed by the user shortly before, see deceptive proposal above. 92.226.212.49 (talk) 08:52, 26 November 2017 (UTC)