Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:Editnotices/Group/User talk:Coffee: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 6: Line 6:


*'''Delete'''. I agree with the argument that listing specific users in an edit notice meets the definition of ''{{xt|[[WP:POLEMIC|Material that can be viewed as attacking other editors, including the recording of perceived flaws]]}}'', considering that other editors might not know why Coffee wants to ban these editors from their talk page and thus might seem as if those editors had harrassed him or worse. While I usually am quite liberal with what people can have in their own userspace but I don't think [[WP:OWNTALK]] justifies this, considering that this guideline explicitly states: ''{{xt|User talk pages must serve their primary purpose, which is to make communication and collaboration among editors easier. Editors who refuse to use their talk page for these purposes are violating the spirit of the talk page guidelines, and are not acting collaboratively.}}'' IMHO, this includes behaviour that is designed to discourage certain editors from said communication and collaboration. Also, I believe [[WP:NOBAN]] applies to user pages, not user talk pages, which has its own guideline in [[WP:OWNTALK]] that takes precedent. N.B.: I sympathize with Coffee's intention of trying to avoid conflicts and stress, however, this does not mitigate the fact that keeping such a list might lead to others, like myself, assuming that those editors did something wrong. Regards '''[[User:SoWhy|<span style="color: #7A2F2F; font-variant:small-caps">So</span>]][[User talk:SoWhy|<span style="color: #474F84; font-variant:small-caps">Why</span>]]''' 11:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. I agree with the argument that listing specific users in an edit notice meets the definition of ''{{xt|[[WP:POLEMIC|Material that can be viewed as attacking other editors, including the recording of perceived flaws]]}}'', considering that other editors might not know why Coffee wants to ban these editors from their talk page and thus might seem as if those editors had harrassed him or worse. While I usually am quite liberal with what people can have in their own userspace but I don't think [[WP:OWNTALK]] justifies this, considering that this guideline explicitly states: ''{{xt|User talk pages must serve their primary purpose, which is to make communication and collaboration among editors easier. Editors who refuse to use their talk page for these purposes are violating the spirit of the talk page guidelines, and are not acting collaboratively.}}'' IMHO, this includes behaviour that is designed to discourage certain editors from said communication and collaboration. Also, I believe [[WP:NOBAN]] applies to user pages, not user talk pages, which has its own guideline in [[WP:OWNTALK]] that takes precedent. N.B.: I sympathize with Coffee's intention of trying to avoid conflicts and stress, however, this does not mitigate the fact that keeping such a list might lead to others, like myself, assuming that those editors did something wrong. Regards '''[[User:SoWhy|<span style="color: #7A2F2F; font-variant:small-caps">So</span>]][[User talk:SoWhy|<span style="color: #474F84; font-variant:small-caps">Why</span>]]''' 11:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per POLEMIC, I'm not sure what's more hilarious - The fact you've "banned" me all for one comment or the fact you've also included well-respected admins!, Hopefully someone soon will take {{u|Coffee|you}} to Arbcom and right actions will happen!, How you became an admin is a fucking mystery!. –[[User:Davey2010|<span style="color: blue;">'''Davey'''</span><span style="color: orange;">'''2010'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Davey2010|<span style="color: navy;">'''Talk'''</span>]]</sup> 11:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:08, 30 January 2018

Template:Editnotices/Group/User talk:Coffee (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This is a WP:POLEMIC list and is amplified by this page: User:Coffee/NOBAN violations is tantamount to an enemies list. I am listed because twinkle dropped a required notification, just as this will generate a notification. DHeyward (talk) 10:42, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is simply an attempt for me to be able to reduce my stress-levels from being increased by interactions with certain users (one of which opened this MfD)... I placed it in a very secluded location (an editnotice on my user talk page) specifically because I did not want it to be a "enemies list", just a request that WP:NOBAN permits to be made. Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 11:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I agree with the argument that listing specific users in an edit notice meets the definition of Material that can be viewed as attacking other editors, including the recording of perceived flaws, considering that other editors might not know why Coffee wants to ban these editors from their talk page and thus might seem as if those editors had harrassed him or worse. While I usually am quite liberal with what people can have in their own userspace but I don't think WP:OWNTALK justifies this, considering that this guideline explicitly states: User talk pages must serve their primary purpose, which is to make communication and collaboration among editors easier. Editors who refuse to use their talk page for these purposes are violating the spirit of the talk page guidelines, and are not acting collaboratively. IMHO, this includes behaviour that is designed to discourage certain editors from said communication and collaboration. Also, I believe WP:NOBAN applies to user pages, not user talk pages, which has its own guideline in WP:OWNTALK that takes precedent. N.B.: I sympathize with Coffee's intention of trying to avoid conflicts and stress, however, this does not mitigate the fact that keeping such a list might lead to others, like myself, assuming that those editors did something wrong. Regards SoWhy 11:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per POLEMIC, I'm not sure what's more hilarious - The fact you've "banned" me all for one comment or the fact you've also included well-respected admins!, Hopefully someone soon will take you to Arbcom and right actions will happen!, How you became an admin is a fucking mystery!. –Davey2010Talk 11:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]