User talk:Mermaid99

Welcome!

Hello, Mermaid99, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

February 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:52, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Mermaid99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I made no disruptive edits. I improved the article, only to find myself attacked by someone who reverted my edits 9 times in 5 days for no clear reason, claiming three contradictory reasons in edit summaries, claiming to have deliberately violated WP:POINT when they mistakenly restored a style violation, used two sockpuppets to further attack me, and deleted my comments on the talk page. Mermaid99 (talk) 20:56, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I made no disruptive edits. I improved the article, only to find myself attacked by someone who reverted my edits 9 times in 5 days for no clear reason, claiming three contradictory reasons in edit summaries, claiming to have deliberately violated [[WP:POINT]] when they mistakenly restored a style violation, used [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/72.52.125.45 two] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/37.255.78.3 sockpuppets] to further attack me, and deleted my comments on the talk page. [[User:Mermaid99|Mermaid99]] ([[User talk:Mermaid99#top|talk]]) 20:56, 13 February 2018 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I made no disruptive edits. I improved the article, only to find myself attacked by someone who reverted my edits 9 times in 5 days for no clear reason, claiming three contradictory reasons in edit summaries, claiming to have deliberately violated [[WP:POINT]] when they mistakenly restored a style violation, used [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/72.52.125.45 two] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/37.255.78.3 sockpuppets] to further attack me, and deleted my comments on the talk page. [[User:Mermaid99|Mermaid99]] ([[User talk:Mermaid99#top|talk]]) 20:56, 13 February 2018 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I made no disruptive edits. I improved the article, only to find myself attacked by someone who reverted my edits 9 times in 5 days for no clear reason, claiming three contradictory reasons in edit summaries, claiming to have deliberately violated [[WP:POINT]] when they mistakenly restored a style violation, used [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/72.52.125.45 two] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/37.255.78.3 sockpuppets] to further attack me, and deleted my comments on the talk page. [[User:Mermaid99|Mermaid99]] ([[User talk:Mermaid99#top|talk]]) 20:56, 13 February 2018 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

No evidence editor in good standing is using sockpuppets, continued attacks despite being explicitly warned, [1] and removal of legit talk page comment. [2] --NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:04, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Oh come on. What do you suppose those two IP editors are, both making their first edits to support User:Codename Lisa? Just a coincidence?? Be serious here. And did you seriously not notice that the user deleted my legit comment, leaving me no way to restore it without removing their subsequent one? Mermaid99 (talk) 21:12, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

No doubt this is nothing that would concern you either. Three IP addresses popping up to support a named account, oh sure, no evidence of sockpuppetry there! Mermaid99 (talk) 21:19, 13 February 2018 (UTC)