User talk:Mermaid99: Difference between revisions
removed nonsense from sockpuppet-lover |
|||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:Oh come on. What do you suppose those two IP editors are, both making their first edits to support User:Codename Lisa? Just a coincidence?? Be serious here. And did you seriously not notice that the user deleted my legit comment, leaving me no way to restore it without removing their subsequent one? [[User:Mermaid99|Mermaid99]] ([[User talk:Mermaid99#top|talk]]) 21:12, 13 February 2018 (UTC) |
:Oh come on. What do you suppose those two IP editors are, both making their first edits to support User:Codename Lisa? Just a coincidence?? Be serious here. And did you seriously not notice that the user deleted my legit comment, leaving me no way to restore it without removing their subsequent one? [[User:Mermaid99|Mermaid99]] ([[User talk:Mermaid99#top|talk]]) 21:12, 13 February 2018 (UTC) |
||
:No doubt [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/66.116.26.89 this] is nothing that would concern you either. Three IP addresses popping up to support a named account, oh sure, no evidence of sockpuppetry there! [[User:Mermaid99|Mermaid99]] ([[User talk:Mermaid99#top|talk]]) 21:19, 13 February 2018 (UTC) |
:No doubt [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/66.116.26.89 this] is nothing that would concern you either. Three IP addresses popping up to support a named account, oh sure, no evidence of sockpuppetry there! [[User:Mermaid99|Mermaid99]] ([[User talk:Mermaid99#top|talk]]) 21:19, 13 February 2018 (UTC) |
||
::If you think {{u|Codename Lisa}} is using sockpuppets, '''file an [[WP:SPI]]'''. Constantly accusing an editor of sockpuppetry without making a formal report won't fly here. And [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Opera_(web_browser)&diff=825512731&oldid=825512106 this] simply removed a valid comment. --[[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 21:20, 13 February 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::Yeah well if you hadn't blocked me while saying nothing at all to them, in clear support of their behaviour, maybe I would. Well, screw that shit, if you people support sock puppeting trolls over people who try to improve articles, no wonder so many articles are in appallingly bad states. Good bye. |
Revision as of 21:25, 13 February 2018
Welcome!
Hello, Mermaid99, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!
February 2018
![Stop icon with clock](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/39/Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. NeilN talk to me 20:52, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/Appointment_blue.svg/48px-Appointment_blue.svg.png)
Mermaid99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I made no disruptive edits. I improved the article, only to find myself attacked by someone who reverted my edits 9 times in 5 days for no clear reason, claiming three contradictory reasons in edit summaries, claiming to have deliberately violated [[WP:POINT]] when they mistakenly restored a style violation, used [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/72.52.125.45 two] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/37.255.78.3 sockpuppets] to further attack me, and deleted my comments on the talk page. [[User:Mermaid99|Mermaid99]] ([[User talk:Mermaid99#top|talk]]) 20:56, 13 February 2018 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I made no disruptive edits. I improved the article, only to find myself attacked by someone who reverted my edits 9 times in 5 days for no clear reason, claiming three contradictory reasons in edit summaries, claiming to have deliberately violated [[WP:POINT]] when they mistakenly restored a style violation, used [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/72.52.125.45 two] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/37.255.78.3 sockpuppets] to further attack me, and deleted my comments on the talk page. [[User:Mermaid99|Mermaid99]] ([[User talk:Mermaid99#top|talk]]) 20:56, 13 February 2018 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I made no disruptive edits. I improved the article, only to find myself attacked by someone who reverted my edits 9 times in 5 days for no clear reason, claiming three contradictory reasons in edit summaries, claiming to have deliberately violated [[WP:POINT]] when they mistakenly restored a style violation, used [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/72.52.125.45 two] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/37.255.78.3 sockpuppets] to further attack me, and deleted my comments on the talk page. [[User:Mermaid99|Mermaid99]] ([[User talk:Mermaid99#top|talk]]) 20:56, 13 February 2018 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
No evidence editor in good standing is using sockpuppets, continued attacks despite being explicitly warned, [1] and removal of legit talk page comment. [2] --NeilN talk to me 21:04, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- Oh come on. What do you suppose those two IP editors are, both making their first edits to support User:Codename Lisa? Just a coincidence?? Be serious here. And did you seriously not notice that the user deleted my legit comment, leaving me no way to restore it without removing their subsequent one? Mermaid99 (talk) 21:12, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- No doubt this is nothing that would concern you either. Three IP addresses popping up to support a named account, oh sure, no evidence of sockpuppetry there! Mermaid99 (talk) 21:19, 13 February 2018 (UTC)